On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 05:15:13PM -0800, Smith wrote:
> It would be nice if sftp/scp/ssh could be chrooted. But I'm sure you
> can always mess with the rights for each user though.
>
> As for "warns of k1dd13s", why care? If you open a port, someone will
> find you. If you're concerned about
It would be nice if sftp/scp/ssh could be chrooted. But I'm sure you
can always mess with the rights for each user though.
As for "warns of k1dd13s", why care? If you open a port, someone will
find you. If you're concerned about the kiddies using up your
bandwidth, have pf running on the sa
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 10:55:31AM -0800, Smith wrote:
> Easiest solution:
>
> Setup a ftp server or sftp/scp/ssh server with OpenBSD on a separate IP
> Address from your firewall/gateway. I once setup a ftp server out in
> the open like that with OpenBSD. I ran no firewalls. I never had any
Easiest solution:
Setup a ftp server or sftp/scp/ssh server with OpenBSD on a separate IP
Address from your firewall/gateway. I once setup a ftp server out in
the open like that with OpenBSD. I ran no firewalls. I never had any
problems. If you do this and say if it does get hacked, broken
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 12:14:52AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2006/01/23 00:57, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> > The main problem, right now, is file transfers. The old server serves
> > FTP over SSL.
>
> Is passive FTP over SSH-tunnel any good? It's easy enough to use a
> win32 build of OpenS
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 01:30:21AM +0100, viq wrote:
> Just a thought - why not samba?
> With some additions, like
> http://www.camden.rutgers.edu/HELP/Documentation/Unix/stunnel/S50-1331_stunnel.php
> or otherwise VPN it.
> ...yeah, i guess it deviates then from the simple setup you had before...
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 12:57:34AM +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> [1] Though if I can get everyone to use public key authentication, I
> could use the command= syntax in ~/.ssh/authorized_keys (where is this
> documented, anyway?).
it is, in sshd(8), under AUTHORIZED_KEYS FILE FORMAT
--
Olivi
Just a thought - why not samba?
With some additions, like
http://www.camden.rutgers.edu/HELP/Documentation/Unix/stunnel/S50-1331_stunnel.php
or otherwise VPN it.
...yeah, i guess it deviates then from the simple setup you had before...
--
viq
On 2006/01/23 00:57, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> The main problem, right now, is file transfers. The old server serves
> FTP over SSL.
Is passive FTP over SSH-tunnel any good? It's easy enough to use a
win32 build of OpenSSH, or plink from PuTTY, to give an easy-to-click
interface for Windows users,
Hello all,
I am currently migrating a server to a trio of machines using OpenBSD,
and ran into a bit of a design problem. Most of this is not OpenBSD
specific; I'll happily take this question elsewhere if told so, but it
would not exactly be the first non-OpenBSD-specific question here.
To start
10 matches
Mail list logo
