Hi,
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024, at 00:25, ofthecentury wrote:
>. And I was under the impression there would be no graphics
> errors week 1 of me using OpenBSD due to the way OpenBSD was
> centered around code auditing and only releasing something very
> stable and tested, especially something so senstive
gt; > Just saw this in my /var/log/messages:
> >
> > '/bsd: drm:pid1338:intel_pipe_update_start *ERROR*
> > [drm] *ERROR* Potential atomic update failure on pipe B'
> >
> > Intel_pipe_update???
> >
>
> No, it isn't a security issue, it
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 05:01:57PM +0500, ofthecentury wrote:
> Just saw this in my /var/log/messages:
>
> '/bsd: drm:pid1338:intel_pipe_update_start *ERROR*
> [drm] *ERROR* Potential atomic update failure on pipe B'
>
> Intel_pipe_update???
>
A fairly simple web search would have provided potet
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 05:01:57PM +0500, ofthecentury wrote:
> Just saw this in my /var/log/messages:
>
> '/bsd: drm:pid1338:intel_pipe_update_start *ERROR*
> [drm] *ERROR* Potential atomic update failure on pipe B'
>
> Intel_pipe_update???
>
No, it isn't a
Just saw this in my /var/log/messages:
'/bsd: drm:pid1338:intel_pipe_update_start *ERROR*
[drm] *ERROR* Potential atomic update failure on pipe B'
Intel_pipe_update???
National Bank of Greece
ÎγαÏηÏοί ÏελάÏεÏ,
Τα αÏÏεία Î¼Î±Ï Î´ÎµÎ¯ÏνοÏ
ν ÏÏι η ÏÏνδεÏη ÏοÏ
λογαÏιαÏÎ¼Î¿Ï ÏÎ±Ï ÎÏει ÏαγÏÏει
λÏÎ³Ï ÏηÏ
ακÏλοÏ
θοÏ
Ï Î»ÏγοÏ
Ï.
ÎίÏÎ¿Î´Î¿Ï Ïε δίκη με ανακÏÎ¹Î²ÎµÎ¯Ï Ïλ
Just wanting a second opinion.
I was investigating why I and a fair few others were occasionally being
redirected to eBay or seeing seemingly random sites when going to common
places like Google, Twitter, etc. Turned out to be caused by the combination
of a few things, one of which was the docume
Richard Toohey schrieb:
$ md5 /usr/sbin/ntpd
MD5 (/usr/sbin/ntpd) = a0c8961d5818b438ecbfd6c40be47a5f
$ cat /etc/passwd
root:*:0:0:Charlie &:/root:/bin/ksh
daemon:*:1:1:The devil himself:/root:/sbin/nologin
operator:*:2:5:System &:/operator:/sbin/nologin
Your system must have been hacked.. The
On 2009-02-20, Jean-Francois wrote:
> I am not sure at all about this, maybe one has changed the daemon.
> After I checked the adresses that this daemon connected to, they were
> very strange as webservers content (blogs, default page 'It works' and
> so one ... I guess ntp servers shall not act l
Who said the french have no sense of humor? Thank you Jean-Francois for
a healthy laugh in the morning!
JB
Jean-Francois schreef:
Hi All,
It looks like my server running since few days has already been hacked.
It looks like a new user called 'daemon' ID 1 and a new group daemon.
User's full n
I didn't reply here for a long time, but this crack me :D
You are the king :D
Jean-Francois pisze:
Hi All,
It looks like my server running since few days has already been hacked.
It looks like a new user called 'daemon' ID 1 and a new group daemon.
User's full name 'The devil itself' First
Those are there by default. If the users shell is 'nologin' then you
are chasing phantoms.
Also, no, someone named 'Charlie' did not compromise root (well, most
likely :-).
-Bryan
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Jean-Francois wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> It looks like my server running since few day
On 21/02/2009, at 12:46 PM, Jean-Francois wrote:
Hi All,
It looks like my server running since few days has already been
hacked.
It looks like a new user called 'daemon' ID 1 and a new group daemon.
User's full name 'The devil itself' First time I find out
evidence
of hack on my serv
On 21 Feb 2009 at 0:46, Jean-Francois wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> It looks like my server running since few days has already been hacked.
> It looks like a new user called 'daemon' ID 1 and a new group daemon.
> User's full name 'The devil itself' First time I find out evidence
> of hack on my serv
Hi All,
It looks like my server running since few days has already been hacked.
It looks like a new user called 'daemon' ID 1 and a new group daemon.
User's full name 'The devil itself' First time I find out evidence
of hack on my server, however it's only one month running !!
It looks like
On Mon, May 23, 2005, First Midwest Bank wrote:
> [IMAGE]
> Dear First Midwest Bank customer,
> We recently reviewed your account, and suspect that your First Midwest
> Internet Banking account may have been accessed by an unauthorized third
> party.
I'm new to this list and I was just wondering
16 matches
Mail list logo