On 2015-05-29 Fri 00:09 AM |, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> Craig Skinner wrote:
>
> > RFC 5321, in section "4.5.4.1. Sending Strategy" has:
> >
> >
> > From memory, they honour the 4 day rule.
>
> I believe so with the possible exception of hotmail as I seem to
> remember thinking it was typical th
On 2015-05-28, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, 18 May 2015 17:39:11 +0100
> Craig Skinner wrote:
>
>> RFC 5321, in section "4.5.4.1. Sending Strategy" has:
>>
>>
>> ...
>> ..
>>
>>Retries continue until the message is transmitted or the sender gives
>>up; the give-up time generally
On Mon, 18 May 2015 17:39:11 +0100
Craig Skinner wrote:
> RFC 5321, in section "4.5.4.1. Sending Strategy" has:
>
>
> ...
> ..
>
>Retries continue until the message is transmitted or the sender gives
>up; the give-up time generally needs to be at least 4-5 days. .
>
>
> > Are
Hi Alex,
On 2015-05-18 Mon 16:37 PM |, Alex Greif wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 02:20:08PM +0100, Craig Skinner wrote:
>
> yes, this should help, in the case that the sender tries longer
> than 4 hours.
>
RFC 5321, in section "4.5.4.1. Sending Strategy" has:
...
..
Retries continu
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 02:20:08PM +0100, Craig Skinner wrote:
Hi Craig,
yes, this should help, in the case that the sender tries longer
than 4 hours.
Are there any experiences, after how many hours/days the sender
side (at the large ones like google, yahoo, hotmail, etc)
gives up?
thanks,
Alex.
On 2015-05-18 Mon 09:26 AM |, Alex Greif wrote:
>
> I am using spamd on a current installation in greylisting mode,
> and have have problems with large sites that have several
> SMTP servers but no SPF ip-address ranges.
Hi Alex,
Bumping up the spamd(8) greyexp time to 2-4 days works well (on 5.
On Mon, 18 May 2015 09:26:13 +0200
Alex Greif wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using spamd on a current installation in greylisting mode,
> and have have problems with large sites that have several
> SMTP servers but no SPF ip-address ranges.
> Sometimes I have more than 10 mail server IPs in the greylisted
>
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 10:52:52AM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 10:05:45AM +0200, Alex Greif wrote:
> > But in some cases, the sender mail server tried so often from different
> > SMTP IPs, and finally gave up with an error to the sender. Then the sender
> > and
> >
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 10:05:45AM +0200, Alex Greif wrote:
> But in some cases, the sender mail server tried so often from different
> SMTP IPs, and finally gave up with an error to the sender. Then the sender and
> receiver persons are quite unhappy, and a lot of time is vasted.
In most cases th
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 09:46:19AM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 09:26:13AM +0200, Alex Greif wrote:
> > I am using spamd on a current installation in greylisting mode,
> > and have have problems with large sites that have several
> > SMTP servers but no SPF ip-addres
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 09:26:13AM +0200, Alex Greif wrote:
> I am using spamd on a current installation in greylisting mode,
> and have have problems with large sites that have several
> SMTP servers but no SPF ip-address ranges.
> Sometimes I have more than 10 mail server IPs in the greylisted
>
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:50:52PM +, Craig Skinner wrote:
| Don't trust SPF;- last time I looked, Google listed about 78,000 ips.
| Liars. Their HR PCs, routers, web servers, tape silos, visitor lobby
| Wifi zones aren't valid senders.
Only 78000 IPs? I think you're off by either a factor of
On 2015-02-23 Mon 22:38 PM |, F Bax wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion. I whitelisted the ip addresses for mta[567].
> am0.yahoodns.net ; but email from yahoo still gets bounced.
>
Email is not instant messaging.
I don't bother with whitelisting, but rather set the spamd(8) greyexp
time to 48 ho
On February 23, 2015 10:38:37 PM EST, F Bax wrote:
>Thanks for the suggestion. I whitelisted the ip addresses for mta[567].
>am0.yahoodns.net ; but email from yahoo still gets bounced. Is there
>an
>easy way to find all the other sources at yahoo?
>
>The message bounced back to yahoo contains...
Thanks for the suggestion. I whitelisted the ip addresses for mta[567].
am0.yahoodns.net ; but email from yahoo still gets bounced. Is there an
easy way to find all the other sources at yahoo?
The message bounced back to yahoo contains...
Received: from [66.196.81.173] by nm34.bullet.mail.bf1.yah
On 2015-02-22, Markus Kolb wrote:
> Why you'd like to whitelist yahoo.com or gmail.com or any other
> non-related smtp?
> I think whitelisting makes only sense for smtps you control or are
> somehow in relation to your network.
Because some of these large senders send mail from multiple servers
Am 2015-02-21 23:51, schrieb F Bax:
In this archived message; Peter explains here how to get ip address for
various gmail servers - which can then be added to whitelist...
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=136449396910976&w=2
When I try this process for yahoo.com; I get
Why you'd like to whi
> Just because you send mail to Yahoo through those IPs doesn't mean they
> send mail to you from those IPs. It's not unheard of for incoming and
> outgoing mail to go through different servers once you get to a certain
> size.
Exactly. Some institutions even delegate
both incomming and outgoing m
On 02/21/15 18:29, Martin Brandenburg wrote:
Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
On 02/21/15 18:09, trondd wrote:
On 2015-02-21 18:57, Martin Brandenburg wrote:
That doesn't mean you can't find the information somewhere else.
I just did this for gmail by simply sending a couple emails, letting
gmail retr
Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
> On 02/21/15 18:09, trondd wrote:
> > On 2015-02-21 18:57, Martin Brandenburg wrote:
> >> That doesn't mean you can't find the information somewhere else.
> >>
> >
> > I just did this for gmail by simply sending a couple emails, letting
> > gmail retry for a couple hours an
On 02/21/15 18:09, trondd wrote:
On 2015-02-21 18:57, Martin Brandenburg wrote:
That doesn't mean you can't find the information somewhere else.
I just did this for gmail by simply sending a couple emails, letting
gmail retry for a couple hours and grabbing the IPs out of spamdb.
Tim.
$
On 2015-02-21 18:57, Martin Brandenburg wrote:
That doesn't mean you can't find the information somewhere else.
I just did this for gmail by simply sending a couple emails, letting
gmail retry for a couple hours and grabbing the IPs out of spamdb.
Tim.
> From owner-misc+M146963=martin=martinbrandenburg@openbsd.org Sat Feb 21
> 23:48:17 2015
> Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 17:51:28 -0500
> Message-ID:
>
> Subject: spamd whitelist
> From: F Bax
> To: OpenBSD
> List-ID:
>
> In this archived message; Peter explains here how to get ip address for
> I am 99% sure that I have seen on the internet SOMEWHERE a "whitelist"
> of servers that are like this. I thought Bob Beck had forwarded one at
> one point in time, but I can only find his post regarding the tarfile he
> maintains for the "zombie" hosts.
>
> Bob, if you are listening, what d
>GREY|205.152.59.67...
>GREY|205.152.59.68...
>GREY|205.152.59.72...
Unless it's changed since I asked, the policy of the list on
greylisting.org is not to list "common queue" sender pools from
a /24 or smaller block because it's intended to be used with
milter-greylist which masks out the last by
On Oct 20, 2006, at 8:42 AM, Will H. Backman wrote:
Steve Williams wrote:
Bob, if you are listening, what do you do at the U of A to handle
these mis-behaving server pools? Anyone else??
I have been running spamd for several years now, and have found that
it works quite well for my comp
Steve Williams wrote:
Hi,
I have been running spamdb greylisting only for several years as my
only line of defense at home. At work I have managed to sneak in a
Sparc64 Sunfire 120 (OpenBSD 3.9) as a caching web proxy & default
gateway.
Today, we had a fairly agressive attack on our email
On 10/19/06, Steve Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have been running spamdb greylisting only for several years as my only
line of defense at home. At work I have managed to sneak in a Sparc64
Sunfire 120 (OpenBSD 3.9) as a caching web proxy & default gateway.
Today, we had a fairly
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 06:23:20PM -0600, Steve Williams wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been running spamdb greylisting only for several years as my only
> line of defense at home. At work I have managed to sneak in a Sparc64
> Sunfire 120 (OpenBSD 3.9) as a caching web proxy & default gateway.
>
> T
On 10/19/06, Steve Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am 99% sure that I have seen on the internet SOMEWHERE a "whitelist"
of servers that are like this. I thought Bob Beck had forwarded one at
one point in time, but I can only find his post regarding the tarfile he
maintains for the "zombie
30 matches
Mail list logo
