Re: Remove outdated /etc/examples/unwind.conf?

On 2021-07-24, David Higgs wrote: > I wonder if there would be any benefit to a sysclean-like tool as part of a > standard upgrade/sysmerge that automatically deletes everything older than > the (supported) current and prior release? I think it's not possible, sometimes config files move from bei

Re: Remove outdated /etc/examples/unwind.conf?

David Higgs(hig...@gmail.com) on 2021.07.24 14:05:04 -0400: > I wonder if there would be any benefit to a sysclean-like tool as part of a > standard upgrade/sysmerge that automatically deletes everything older than > the (supported) current and prior release? It would remove the need to > curate r

Re: Remove outdated /etc/examples/unwind.conf?

On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 5:33 AM Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2021-07-21, David Higgs wrote: > > I was looking into how to configure unwind for my needs, and found > > significant discrepancies between /etc/examples/unwind.conf and the > > unwind.conf(5) manual. Namely, the example file had lots

Re: Remove outdated /etc/examples/unwind.conf?

On 2021-07-21, David Higgs wrote: > I was looking into how to configure unwind for my needs, and found > significant discrepancies between /etc/examples/unwind.conf and the > unwind.conf(5) manual. Namely, the example file had lots of captive portal > info, while the manual made no mention of it.

Re: remove password advice in afterboot.8 and passwd.1

> From: "Jason McIntyre" > To: "misc" > Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 2:03:26 AM > Subject: Re: remove password advice in afterboot.8 and passwd.1 > On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 11:23:14PM -0400, Rob Pierce wrote: > > Stop giving password advice. Instead, mak

Re: remove password advice in afterboot.8 and passwd.1

On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 11:23:14PM -0400, Rob Pierce wrote: > Stop giving password advice. Instead, make a general statement about password > strength in passwd.1. > > Rob > i don;t see why we should not try to give advice. jmc > Index: afterboot.8 >

Re: remove files progress bar : solved!

Thank You very much Raul! This is precisely the way I was looking for... > Try this, then: > > # yes | rm -ir /home/games; echo > > This will put everything on one long line which will be a bit ugly, > but will show progress as it happens. > > Thanks, > > -- > Raul > > > On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at

Re: remove files progress bar

One could rsync -avP --delete-during /var/empty /dir/to/clean/ also if you like to see a list of files flash by. Or something with find ... -exec rm {} + and later something to clean out links, sockets and/or dirs. 2016-04-03 9:39 GMT+02:00 Raul Miller : > On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 2:57 AM, Max Pow

Re: remove files progress bar

On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 2:57 AM, Max Power wrote: > Hi guys! > Is there a way to view the deleted file or a progress bar > while you're erasing them? > > Thanks for Your reply. Do you mean like this? yes | rm -i ./* 2>&1 | sed 's/remove //g; s/\?//g' |fmt If that kind of behavior is what you wan

Re: Remove "flags S/SA keep state" for tcp packets (SOLVED)

On 12/16/2015 08:19 AM, C.L. Martinez wrote: On 12/15/2015 07:29 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2015-12-15, C. L. Martinez wrote: On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 9:56 AM, David Dahlberg wrote: Am Dienstag, den 15.12.2015, 09:24 + schrieb C. L. Martinez: I am trying to remove "flags S/SA keep

Re: Remove "flags S/SA keep state" for tcp packets

On 12/15/2015 07:29 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2015-12-15, C. L. Martinez wrote: On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 9:56 AM, David Dahlberg wrote: Am Dienstag, den 15.12.2015, 09:24 + schrieb C. L. Martinez: I am trying to remove "flags S/SA keep state" for tcp packets inside pf.conf and use

Re: Remove "flags S/SA keep state" for tcp packets

On 2015-12-15, C. L. Martinez wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 9:56 AM, David Dahlberg > wrote: >> Am Dienstag, den 15.12.2015, 09:24 + schrieb C. L. Martinez: >>> I am trying to remove "flags S/SA keep state" for tcp packets inside >>> pf.conf and use "keep state" only, as it can do with udp

Re: Remove "flags S/SA keep state" for tcp packets

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 9:56 AM, David Dahlberg wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 15.12.2015, 09:24 + schrieb C. L. Martinez: >> I am trying to remove "flags S/SA keep state" for tcp packets inside >> pf.conf and use "keep state" only, as it can do with udp and icmp. >> >> According to pf.conf man p

Re: Remove "flags S/SA keep state" for tcp packets

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 09:24:03AM +, C. L. Martinez wrote: >> >> I am trying to remove "flags S/SA keep state" for tcp packets inside >> pf.conf and use "keep state" only, as it can do with udp and icmp. > > Why? What is it you'r

Re: Remove "flags S/SA keep state" for tcp packets

Am Dienstag, den 15.12.2015, 09:24 + schrieb C. L. Martinez: >  I am trying to remove "flags S/SA keep state" for tcp packets inside > pf.conf and use "keep state" only, as it can do with udp and icmp. > >  According to pf.conf man page, this is possible inserting "no state" > in tcp rule, but

Re: Remove "flags S/SA keep state" for tcp packets

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 09:24:03AM +, C. L. Martinez wrote: > > I am trying to remove "flags S/SA keep state" for tcp packets inside > pf.conf and use "keep state" only, as it can do with udp and icmp. Why? What is it you're trying to achieve? You can override the default flags by specifyin

Re: Remove the mirrored site at openbsd.das.ufsc.br

Hi, We are working on it. I was responsible for keeping this mirror updated but, since 2010, there were significant changes in the lab (in a brazilian engineering school) and I have lost my account and ssh access to the machine. Trying to contact the so called "sysadmin" responsible was unsucces

Re: Remove removed utilities?

Nick Holland wrote: > Things that are out-right replaced (i.e., sudo) should be actively > deleted. Even if it still works after upgrade, some day it is going to > break, and you should be pushed to use the new application (or the > package of the old application). Things like tip? what's the po

Re: Remove removed utilities?

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:12:31AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote: > On 10/19/15 04:24, Raimo Niskanen wrote: > > Hello misc@ > > > > I just noticed from the detailed changelog 5.7->5.8: > > http://www.openbsd.org/plus58.html > > that e.g tcopy, tip and lmccontrol were removed, but after upgrading

Re: Remove removed utilities?

On 10/19/15 04:24, Raimo Niskanen wrote: > Hello misc@ > > I just noticed from the detailed changelog 5.7->5.8: > http://www.openbsd.org/plus58.html > that e.g tcopy, tip and lmccontrol were removed, but after upgrading from > 5.7 to 5.8 I still have /usr/bin/tip, /usr/bin/tcopy and /sbin/lmcc

Re: Remove print/acroread

> I'd like to rm print/acroread from cvs. > > >>> I don't see the point of keeping it, while we have other working > >>> pdf readers. I don't even understand why we have it at all. OK to > >>> remove it. > >> You don't use pdf form filling. Over the last few years, I've seen > >> people w

Re: Remove print/acroread

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 1:26 AM, Jason Adams wrote: > On 10/29/2014 11:22 AM, Артур Истомин wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 04:25:02PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 04:11:47PM +0100, Alexandre Ratchov wrote: On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 08:30:32AM -0600, David Coppa wrote:

Re: Remove print/acroread

On 10/29/2014 11:22 AM, Артур Истомин wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 04:25:02PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 04:11:47PM +0100, Alexandre Ratchov wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 08:30:32AM -0600, David Coppa wrote: So here I am, asking on misc@... Do people

Re: Remove print/acroread

In message I wrote > [[various things that need fillable pdf forms of a sort that no > native OpenBSD software seems to grok]] > > There's still a place in the computing world for Windoze machines. :( In message

Re: Remove print/acroread

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 07:35:33PM +, Grumpy wrote: > > Considering most of the answers to the original question have totally > > gone out of topic, please remove print/acroread asap so that this > > thread dies. > > Cool down, man! Hadn't enough cheese lately? You clearly mistake me for some

Re: Remove print/acroread

> Considering most of the answers to the original question have totally > gone out of topic, please remove print/acroread asap so that this > thread dies. Cool down, man! Hadn't enough cheese lately?

Re: Remove print/acroread

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 06:22:44PM +, Артур Истомин wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 04:25:02PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 04:11:47PM +0100, Alexandre Ratchov wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 08:30:32AM -0600, David Coppa wrote: > > > > So here I am, asking on misc

Re: Remove print/acroread

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 04:25:02PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 04:11:47PM +0100, Alexandre Ratchov wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 08:30:32AM -0600, David Coppa wrote: > > > So here I am, asking on misc@... > > > > > > Do people using acroread-7.0.9 on i386 (compat_linux)

Re: Remove print/acroread

Jonathan Thornburg writes: > +1 on Marc's point. And US tax forms too. (Canada doesn't yet force > the use of fillable-pdf-forms, so I donno about those.) Not to mention > the new-member-application forms on a certain Credit Union I just > joined evince in packages does a good job with PD

Re: Remove print/acroread

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Alexandre Ratchov wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:25:10PM -0400, Jonathan Thornburg wrote: >> In message >> Alexandre Ratchov wrote [[about acroread]] >> > I don't see the point of keeping it, while we ha

Re: Remove print/acroread

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:25:10PM -0400, Jonathan Thornburg wrote: > In message > Alexandre Ratchov wrote [[about acroread]] > > I don't see the point of keeping it, while we have other working > > pdf readers. I don't even understand why we

Re: Remove print/acroread

In message Alexandre Ratchov wrote [[about acroread]] > I don't see the point of keeping it, while we have other working > pdf readers. I don't even understand why we have it at all. OK to > remove it. In message

Re: Remove print/acroread

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 04:11:47PM +0100, Alexandre Ratchov wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 08:30:32AM -0600, David Coppa wrote: > > So here I am, asking on misc@... > > > > Do people using acroread-7.0.9 on i386 (compat_linux) still exist > > these days? > > > > I'd like to rm print/acroread fr

Re: Remove print/acroread

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 08:30:32AM -0600, David Coppa wrote: > So here I am, asking on misc@... > > Do people using acroread-7.0.9 on i386 (compat_linux) still exist > these days? > > I'd like to rm print/acroread from cvs. > I don't see the point of keeping it, while we have other working pdf

Re: Remove print/acroread

#x27;d like to rm print/acroread from cvs. > > Cheers! > David > > > -- Forwarded message -- > > From: frantisek holop > > Date: Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 7:31 PM > > Subject: Re: remove print/acroread > > To: po...@openbsd.org > > >

Re: remove swap partion after physical machine converted into vm

Hi Josh, thx for the fast reply I will check the fstab out it may solve the problem regards Markus Am 27.08.2014 13:58, schrieb Josh Grosse: On 2014-08-27 05:15, Markus Rosjat wrote: Hello, I simply dd'ed the HDD of our Server and converted the image to a virtual disk, I created a VM ans f

Re: remove swap partion after physical machine converted into vm

On 2014-08-27 05:15, Markus Rosjat wrote: Hello, I simply dd'ed the HDD of our Server and converted the image to a virtual disk, I created a VM ans fired it up. Of course I get the information that the softraid can't find another disk but it's not really needed anymore. The problem I have now is

Re: Remove default X rootweave

On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 17:47:59 +0100 Alessandro Gallo wrote: > I'm trying to remove the default checkerboard background that is > shipped with the OpenBSD version of X. > During my research I stumbled across this: > http://openbsd.7691.n7.nabble.com/X-Window-System-settings-for-better-user-ex perie

Re: Remove default X rootweave

-retard worked like a charm, thank you! 2014-01-31 David Coppa : > > Il giorno 31/gen/2014 17.49, "Alessandro Gallo" ha > scritto: > > > > > Hello misc@, > > > > I'm trying to remove the default checkerboard background that is shipped > > with the OpenBSD version of X. > > During my research I

Re: Remove default X rootweave

Il giorno 31/gen/2014 17.49, "Alessandro Gallo" ha scritto: > > Hello misc@, > > I'm trying to remove the default checkerboard background that is shipped > with the OpenBSD version of X. > During my research I stumbled across this: > http://openbsd.7691.n7.nabble.com/X-Window-System-settings-for-b

Re: remove

Jason [size...@gmail.com] wrote: > Please remove Please provide your name, address, social security number, phone number, and credit card information. You will then be removed. Chris

Re: remove entry from spamdb greylist

REY until it expires, so maybe I wasn't patient enough. Anyhow today as I checked this IP is listed under WHITE so it looks like it finally worked as I wanted. Regards, M.L. From: Peter N. M. Hansteen To: ML mail Cc: misc Sent: Wednesday, August 14,

Re: remove entry from spamdb greylist

elist. The final goal being simply to allow mail coming in from this mail server. Regards, M.L. From: Boudewijn Dijkstra To: misc Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 12:39 PM Subject: Re: remove entry from spamdb greylist Op Tue, 13 Aug 2013 17:49:51 +0200 schre

Re: remove entry from spamdb greylist

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 06:38:50AM -0700, ML mail wrote: > This mail server has been somehow wrongly marked as grey and would stay stuck > like in this state not allowing mails flowing in. Somehow after 3 attempts it > should have whitelisted this IP so it didn't. What I now did is to manually > ad

Re: remove entry from spamdb greylist

ly to allow mail coming in from this mail server. Regards, M.L. From: Boudewijn Dijkstra To: misc Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 12:39 PM Subject: Re: remove entry from spamdb greylist Op Tue, 13 Aug 2013 17:49:51 +0200 schreef ML mail : > I am using

Re: remove entry from spamdb greylist

!-- On Tue 13.Aug'13 at 16:49:51 BST, ML mail (mlnos...@yahoo.com), wrote: > Hello, > > I am using spamd in greylisting mode and would like to delete the following > entry: > > GREY|207.126.144.121|eu1sys200aog106.obsmtp.com|||1376398715|1376400232|1376413115|4|0 > > I tried the following comm

Re: remove entry from spamdb greylist

Op Tue, 13 Aug 2013 17:49:51 +0200 schreef ML mail : I am using spamd in greylisting mode and would like to delete the following entry: GREY|207.126.144.121|eu1sys200aog106.obsmtp.com|||1376398715|1376400232|1376413115|4|0 I tried the following command: spamdb -d 207.126.144.121 Unfortunat

Re: remove .Tn abuse

This diff removes .Tn abuse from usr.sbin - more to come. I am not sure about /usr/src/usr.sbin/dev_mkdb/dev_mkdb.8 where I removed the .Tn's from Keys are a structure containing a .Tn mode_t followed by a .Tn dev_t , (as these are clearly not "tradenames") - but

Re: remove mandoc-skipped Pp and Ns

On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:11:54AM +0200, Jan Stary wrote: > mandoc -Tlint reveals that some of the Pp and Ns are skipped anyway. > Reword slightly to get rid of the parantheses > that required the Ns in the first place. > > fixed, thanks. i tweaked it a little. jmc Index: libc/net/getrrsetbyna

Re: remove old distfiles no longer associated with ports?

Have a look at clean-old-distfiles(1) On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 9:10 PM, f5b wrote: > how to auto clean old distfiles no longer associated with new ports source. > > > any clue?

Re: remove users from group

> >> You're all wrong. We obviously need XML user databases. > > > > go play with phk, only JSON is web scale. > > Talk YAML to me, baby. Over ASN.1, of course.

Re: remove users from group

On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Henning Brauer wrote: > * Bret Lambert [2010-12-13 10:32]: >> You're all wrong. We obviously need XML user databases. > > go play with phk, only JSON is web scale. Talk YAML to me, baby. > > -- > Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org > BS Web Service

Re: remove users from group

* Bret Lambert [2010-12-13 10:32]: > You're all wrong. We obviously need XML user databases. go play with phk, only JSON is web scale. -- Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org BS Web Services, http://bsws.de Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services Dedicated Servers,

Re: remove users from group

Il 13/12/10 10.23, Bret Lambert ha scritto: On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:14 AM, MERIGHI Marcus wrote: h...@stare.cz (Jan Stary), 2010.12.13 (Mon) 09:15 (CET): On Dec 13 12:01:58, OpenBSD Geek wrote: I have 100 users in groups : clients, and ftp_group How can i remove these 100 users from ftp_gro

Re: remove users from group

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:14 AM, MERIGHI Marcus wrote: > h...@stare.cz (Jan Stary), 2010.12.13 (Mon) 09:15 (CET): >> On Dec 13 12:01:58, OpenBSD Geek wrote: >> > I have 100 users in groups : clients, and ftp_group >> > How can i remove these 100 users from ftp_group ? >> > I have already try user

Re: remove users from group

h...@stare.cz (Jan Stary), 2010.12.13 (Mon) 09:15 (CET): > On Dec 13 12:01:58, OpenBSD Geek wrote: > > I have 100 users in groups : clients, and ftp_group > > How can i remove these 100 users from ftp_group ? > > I have already try usermod, but it only add users to group, not remove. > > Is there a

Re: remove users from group

You may also try copying over a valid groups file from a different machine. On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Jan Stary wrote: > On Dec 13 12:01:58, OpenBSD Geek wrote: > > I have 100 users in groups : clients, and ftp_group > > How can i remove these 100 users from ftp_group ? > > I have already

Re: remove users from group

On 13/12/2010 08:15, Jan Stary wrote: On Dec 13 12:01:58, OpenBSD Geek wrote: I have 100 users in groups : clients, and ftp_group How can i remove these 100 users from ftp_group ? I have already try usermod, but it only add users to group, not remove. Is there a way to achieve my task ? Sadly,

Re: remove users from group

On Dec 13 12:01:58, OpenBSD Geek wrote: > I have 100 users in groups : clients, and ftp_group > How can i remove these 100 users from ftp_group ? > I have already try usermod, but it only add users to group, not remove. > Is there a way to achieve my task ? Sadly, no. These users will be members o

Re: remove users from group

12/12/10, Joachim Schipper wrote: From: Joachim Schipper Subject: Re: remove users from group To: misc@openbsd.org Date: Sunday, December 12, 2010, 1:22 PM On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 03:44:18PM +0400, OpenBSD Geek wrote: > To remove users from example group "users", i usually do it by editin

Re: remove users from group

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 03:44:18PM +0400, OpenBSD Geek wrote: > To remove users from example group "users", i usually do it by editing the > file /etc/group, and remove it manually. > Is there a way from command line to remove some users from a specific > group ? > > I want to do a script like tha

Re: Remove X Window after 4.4/i386 Installation?

Ted Unangst wrote: > On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Cezary Morga wrote: > > Ted Unangst wrote: > >> There's no way to uninstall, though deleting /usr/X11R6 will get > >> you 90% there. > > > > How about following? > > cd / > > tar -ztf /path/to/xbase44.tgz | xargs rm > > 1. that doesn't delete n

Re: Remove X Window after 4.4/i386 Installation?

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Cezary Morga wrote: > Ted Unangst wrote: >> There's no way to uninstall, though deleting /usr/X11R6 will get you >> 90% there. > > How about following? > cd / > tar -ztf /path/to/xbase44.tgz | xargs rm 1. that doesn't delete nearly 90% of X, unless you also do it

Re: Remove X Window after 4.4/i386 Installation?

Cezary Morga wrote on Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 07:31:59PM +0100: > How about following? > cd / > tar -ztf /path/to/xbase44.tgz | xargs rm Look up http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=121190668200375&w=2 (May 27, 2008) and read the whole thread, in particular the very useful postings by Stuart Henders

Re: Remove X Window after 4.4/i386 Installation?

Ted Unangst wrote: > There's no way to uninstall, though deleting /usr/X11R6 will get you > 90% there. How about following? cd / tar -ztf /path/to/xbase44.tgz | xargs rm -- Cezary Morga "If everything seems under control, you're not going fast enough" (Mario Andretti)

Re: Remove X Window after 4.4/i386 Installation?

Hi Jack, Jack Ort wrote on Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 11:39:03AM -0600: > Recently installed 4.4 on an old Pentium box, with all(?) of the X > file sets. Thinking now of trying to use it as a firewall, and I've > read that I should not have X on a firewall. Well, probably you should not *run* X on a

Re: Remove X Window after 4.4/i386 Installation?

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Jack Ort wrote: > Recently installed 4.4 on an old Pentium box, with all(?) of the X > file sets. Thinking now of trying to use it as a firewall, and I've > read that I should not have X on a firewall. > > Is there an easy way to uninstall X, or should I just inst

Re: "remove any unwanted devices from the kernel. "

Nick Holland wrote: > The biggest reasons to do this are because you have too much > time on your hands, and you want to impress people by having > things break, then you swoop in to rescue everyone from your > fabricated disaster. Actually I think most people do it because you are tought to do so

Re: "remove any unwanted devices from the kernel. "

On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 16:50:37 -0700 Scott Learmonth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As someone else who writes code for this fine os would say: removing > > drivers is pure masturbation. > > Hah, perfect. > > As a first foray into BSD I stumbled upon FreeBSD. To make it do what > I wanted, step o

Re: "remove any unwanted devices from the kernel. "

* Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-06 16:05]: > On 6/6/08, Jordi Beltran Creix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Then what is the meaning of this comment in the kernel's memcpy? > > A few kbs don't matter, yet a dozen bytes do? > > > > > /* > > > * This is designed to be small, not fast. >

Re: "remove any unwanted devices from the kernel. "

* Geoff Steckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-06 12:55]: > For systems which must boot very quickly, removing unused drivers > whose probe routines cause significant timeouts can make a big > difference. bullshit. config -ef /bsd and disable does it nicely. -- Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: "remove any unwanted devices from the kernel. "

* Jon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-06 03:04]: > Why would someone want to do this? because it is plain boring to just use GENERIC. fiddling with your kernel, you can waste a lot of time to get it to compile, then brag about that over beer with your friends, and while they keep drinking your pag

Re: "remove any unwanted devices from the kernel. "

As someone else who writes code for this fine os would say: removing drivers is pure masturbation. Hah, perfect. As a first foray into BSD I stumbled upon FreeBSD. To make it do what I wanted, step one was to compile a custom kernel. BOOYAH, I got a geek-on. A few months later I had chose

Re: "remove any unwanted devices from the kernel. "

The people reading the faq are not the people who need custom kernels. Those people *know* what they need and are not deterred. But as always, when we try to help the userbase by offering the advice they need, someone needs to chime in and muddy the waters. So now some dude is going to read

Re: "remove any unwanted devices from the kernel. "

On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:14:55 -0400 "Ted Unangst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote On 6/6/08, Geoff Steckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> For systems which must boot very quickly, removing unused drivers >> whose probe routines cause significant timeouts can make a big >> difference. Sometimes timeouts

Re: "remove any unwanted devices from the kernel. "

Jordi Beltran Creix wrote: Well, according to previous answers, the 25 years old comment was actually justified, but if it weren't, style(9) would come to mind. Been eating your own dog food lately? If we understand that custom kernels are unsupported, that some kernel options can be modified wit

Re: "remove any unwanted devices from the kernel. "

> That comment comes from a time when memory cost ten bucks a byte. We > don't necessarily keep all the comments up to date with the current > market prices, though, figuring anybody reading kernel comments is > moderately rational. Apparently not. Well, according to previous answers, the 25 yea

Re: "remove any unwanted devices from the kernel. "

On 6/6/08, Geoff Steckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Threats of unspecified system instability are hard to believe. http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=109088660014351&w=2 > For systems which must boot very quickly, removing unused drivers > whose probe routines cause significant timeouts can

Re: "remove any unwanted devices from the kernel. "

On 6/6/08, Jordi Beltran Creix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Then what is the meaning of this comment in the kernel's memcpy? > A few kbs don't matter, yet a dozen bytes do? > > > /* > > * This is designed to be small, not fast. > > */ That comment comes from a time when memory cost ten bucks

Re: "remove any unwanted devices from the kernel. "

On 6/6/08 6:52 AM, "Geoff Steckel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Sometimes it matters to be small and sometimes fast. That is a decision >> made by the kernel hacker. Joe user does not make these decisions >> because he/she does not understand the overall impact. > >> As someone else who writes

Re: "remove any unwanted devices from the kernel. "

>Sometimes it matters to be small and sometimes fast. That is a decision >made by the kernel hacker. Joe user does not make these decisions >because he/she does not understand the overall impact. >As someone else who writes code for this fine os would say: removing >drivers is pure masturbation.

Re: "remove any unwanted devices from the kernel. "

Sometimes it matters to be small and sometimes fast. That is a decision made by the kernel hacker. Joe user does not make these decisions because he/she does not understand the overall impact. As someone else who writes code for this fine os would say: removing drivers is pure masturbation. On

Re: "remove any unwanted devices from the kernel. "

On 2008-06-06, Jordi Beltran Creix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Then what is the meaning of this comment in the kernel's memcpy? > A few kbs don't matter, yet a dozen bytes do? It depends where the bytes are. If they're not optional and are somewhere that needs to fit on *all* install media for *a

Re: "remove any unwanted devices from the kernel. "

On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 06:05:06PM +0900, Jordi Beltran Creix wrote: > Then what is the meaning of this comment in the kernel's memcpy? > A few kbs don't matter, yet a dozen bytes do? GENERIC has different constraints than install kernels or boot code. We use the same memcpy in all three.

Re: "remove any unwanted devices from the kernel. "

Then what is the meaning of this comment in the kernel's memcpy? A few kbs don't matter, yet a dozen bytes do? > /* > * This is designed to be small, not fast. > */ 2008/6/6, Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Jon wrote: >>> I usually name the kernel to the machine hostname, but you can give

Re: "remove any unwanted devices from the kernel. "

Jon wrote: >> I usually name the kernel to the machine hostname, but you can give it >> any name. Edit the kernel config file: >> >> Remove any hardware related options that are not relevant to your >> machine. >> > http://www.muine.org/~hoang/openpf.html#customize > > Why would someone want to

Re: "remove any unwanted devices from the kernel. "

On 6/5/08, Jon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I usually name the kernel to the machine hostname, but you can give it > > any name. Edit the kernel config file: > > > > Remove any hardware related options that are not relevant to your > > machine. > > > http://www.muine.org/~hoang/openpf.html#

Re: "remove any unwanted devices from the kernel. "

2008/6/5 Jon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> I usually name the kernel to the machine hostname, but you can give it >> any name. Edit the kernel config file: >> >> Remove any hardware related options that are not relevant to your >> machine. >> > http://www.muine.org/~hoang/openpf.html#customize > > Why wo

Re: remove port

Daniel Ouellet ha scritto: Anil Saini wrote: how can i completely uninstall port or package from openBSD http://openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#PkgRemove man ports(7) man pkg_add(1) man pkg_delete(1)

Re: remove port

Anil Saini wrote: how can i completely uninstall port or package from openBSD http://openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#PkgRemove

Re: remove port

On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 09:03:04PM -0700, Anil Saini wrote: > how can i completely uninstall port or package from openBSD http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#PkgMgmt

Re: Remove escape characters from file

On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 03:45:39PM +0200, Pieter Verberne wrote: > > does OpenBSD have a program/script to remove control characters (escape > sequence) from text files? > Try col -b -- Brett Lymn "Warning: The information contained in this email and any attached files is confidential to BAE S

Re: Remove escape characters from file

Hi Peter, > does OpenBSD have a program/script to remove control characters (escape > sequence) from text files? Sure, sed 's/[^A-Z ]//g' No kidding: Usually you want to specify which characters to allow, not which characters to remove (default deny policy). In case you want to allow more than

Re: Remove escape characters from file

On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 03:45:39PM +0200, Pieter Verberne wrote: > Hi, Hi Pieter. > does OpenBSD have a program/script to remove control characters (escape > sequence) from text files? Do you mean something like the ^M (\r) character ? I recommend using tr, e.g.: tr -d '\r' < name_of_inputfile >

Re: Remove escape characters from file

On 10/26/07, Pieter Verberne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > does OpenBSD have a program/script to remove control characters (escape > sequence) from text files? Not sure if this is what you are wanting. tr '\r' '\n' < inputfile > outputfile more info @ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newline

Re: Remove escape characters from file

Pieter, To remove the ^M characters at the end of all lines in vi, use: :%s/^V^M//g The ^v is a CONTROL-V character and ^m is a CONTROL-M. When you type this, it will look like this: :%s/^M//g -- Calomel @ http://calomel.org Open Source Research and Reference On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 03:45:3

Re: Remove x11/ion

>Naw, I like bananawm better =). Such features could include: >. Changing the mouse cursor to a banana. >. A theme song is absolutely necessary... >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bananaphone >. Banana background! >. Floating bananas like xsnow! >. A banana clock... hrm, analog sounds good, but binar

Re: Remove x11/ion

. A Pulp Fiction themed FPS with the only weapons being bannanas... hey, a wm has to have it all, after all! See http://www.flickr.com/photos/i-capture/16136112/ for an artistic example we can base it off of. Banana, mofo, do you speak it? This classic piece of graffiti artwork was painted ove

Re: Remove x11/ion

* Darrin Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-30 09:49:19]: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 11:24:07AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote: > > Sure we can keep ion3 ad is but I'd like to pick up the new changes in a > > forked project called bananawm :-) > > bananawm? I don't get it. How about FreeIon for a

Re: remove sendmail/install postfix

On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 11:49:07 +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: >Hi, > >On Sat, 03.02.2007 at 21:26:36 +0100, Andreas Maus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> But the mailwraper provides a more generic way for >> OpenBSD to use mail without dealing much about >> the uses mail system. (sendmail,postfix,exim,qmail

  1   2   >