On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:19:37 +0200, Berk D. Demir wrote:
> This permission problem smells like a mixed kernel and userland match
> or a version spaghetti to me.
>
> Please try a recent snapshot if possible. In case you want to run
> -stable, make a _clean_ build.
Sounds reasonable. Only, I did
Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 10:11:36AM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote:
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 21:07:57 +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
No clue, but upgrading is a good idea and this is what it looks like on
my box:
[...]
It doesn't look different on mine ... and the upgrade will ha
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 10:11:36AM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 21:07:57 +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
>
> > No clue, but upgrading is a good idea and this is what it looks like on
> > my box:
>
> [...]
>
> It doesn't look different on mine ... and the upgrade will happen
> ho
--- Quoting Uwe Dippel on 2006/11/19 at 10:11 +0800:
> On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 21:07:57 +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
>
> > On second thought, are you certain pflogd *should* be listening on bpf0?
>
> No; but it never did before (despite of the reboots) and I didn't make it
> to do so.
pflogd uses
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 21:07:57 +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> No clue, but upgrading is a good idea and this is what it looks like on
> my box:
[...]
It doesn't look different on mine ... and the upgrade will happen
hopefully soon ...
> On second thought, are you certain pflogd *should* be list
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 05:41:51PM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> In all of Google I found just one of these; on FreeBSD.
> This machine - rebooted several times in the last 18 months - had never
> had this (in /var/log/messages) before; and no changes being done to the
> software, permissions or the m
6 matches
Mail list logo
