On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 10:11:36AM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 21:07:57 +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
>
> > No clue, but upgrading is a good idea and this is what it looks like on
> > my box:
>
> [...]
>
> It doesn't look different on mine ... and the upgrade will happen
> hopefully soon ...
>
> > On second thought, are you certain pflogd *should* be listening on bpf0?
>
> No; but it never did before (despite of the reboots) and I didn't make it
> to do so.
>
> > And not on, say, pflog0? It's a privilige separated daemon running as
> > `_pflogd', so that it can't open the above files does make sense...
>
> How *would* I make it listen on /dev/xxxxx, by the way ? (Except by
> changing the source, that is ?)
At least on my box, pflogd(8) documents the -i option to listen on
another interface. pflog0 would qualify.
I believe this is a post-4.0 addition, though.
Joachim
