Re: partition layout

2007-10-06 Thread Steve Shockley
Douglas A. Tutty wrote: It also works just fine as: home mail server, Unless, of course, you run Perl-based anti-spam filters... I just upgraded a P2 2x450 to P3 2x933 and it still seems sluggish.

Re: partition layout

2007-10-06 Thread Douglas A. Tutty
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 05:14:53AM -0500, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: > On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 17:10 -0700, Clint Pachl wrote: > > The only thing I would use that 486 for would be an X client, with a > > good graphics card, a router, or as a command line tinkering system. > > Yes, a 486 is still plenty

Re: partition layout

2007-10-06 Thread Shawn K. Quinn
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 17:10 -0700, Clint Pachl wrote: > The only thing I would use that 486 for would be an X client, with a > good graphics card, a router, or as a command line tinkering system. Yes, a 486 is still plenty of system for use as a router, assuming the right networking hardware is a

Re: partition layout

2007-10-04 Thread Clint Pachl
Douglas A. Tutty wrote: Hello all, I have a 486DX4-100 with 32 MB ram. I bought an 8 GB drive to put in my P-II and it won't boot it so I've put in in the 486 along with a 1 GB drive. I'm on dialup and would like to avoid a bad partitioning decision requring a whole new install/download cycle

Re: partition layout

2007-10-04 Thread Douglas A. Tutty
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 08:39:57AM -0300, Marcus Andree wrote: > On 10/4/07, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 07:46:01PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote: > > > Douglas A. Tutty wrote: > > > > > > > > I have a 486DX4-100 with 32 MB ram. I bought an 8 GB drive to put

Re: partition layout

2007-10-04 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
"Marcus Andree" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If you're trying to install OpenBSD on a 486 machine just to keep your > proficience levels, why not just virtualize it on whatever is the OS that will > boot the P-II? I suppose the real answer to that is along the lines of 'there is nothing that

Re: partition layout

2007-10-04 Thread Marcus Andree
On 10/4/07, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 07:46:01PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote: > > Douglas A. Tutty wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > > > I have a 486DX4-100 with 32 MB ram. I bought an 8 GB drive to put in my > > > P-II and it won't boot it so I've put in in

Re: partition layout

2007-10-03 Thread Douglas A. Tutty
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 07:46:01PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote: > Douglas A. Tutty wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I have a 486DX4-100 with 32 MB ram. I bought an 8 GB drive to put in my > > P-II and it won't boot it so I've put in in the 486 along with a 1 GB > > drive. > > you might want to spend

Re: partition layout

2007-10-03 Thread Jacob Meuser
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 02:03:41AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2007/10/03 19:46, Nick Holland wrote: > > I wish there was an economical way to get some of the stuff I toss > > out to some of the people in the world who would love to have it. > > freecycle.org might be worth a look. or se

Re: partition layout

2007-10-03 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2007/10/03 19:46, Nick Holland wrote: > > I have a 486DX4-100 with 32 MB ram. I bought an 8 GB drive to put in my > > P-II and it won't boot it so I've put in in the 486 along with a 1 GB > > drive. > > you might want to spend more time on that PII system... yes. an OS booted from another dri

Re: partition layout

2007-10-03 Thread Nick Holland
Douglas A. Tutty wrote: > Hello all, > > I have a 486DX4-100 with 32 MB ram. I bought an 8 GB drive to put in my > P-II and it won't boot it so I've put in in the 486 along with a 1 GB > drive. you might want to spend more time on that PII system... > I'm on dialup and would like to avoid a bad

Re: partition layout

2007-10-03 Thread Stephan Andre'
On Wednesday 03 October 2007 11:50:40 Douglas A. Tutty wrote: > Hello all, > > I have a 486DX4-100 with 32 MB ram. I bought an 8 GB drive to put in my > P-II and it won't boot it so I've put in in the 486 along with a 1 GB > drive. > > I'm on dialup and would like to avoid a bad partitioning decis

Re: partition layout

2007-10-03 Thread Douglas A. Tutty
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 12:40:25PM -0400, Stephan Andre' wrote: > On Wednesday 03 October 2007 11:50:40 Douglas A. Tutty wrote: > > > Here's what I'm thinking: > > > > wd0 (1.1 GB drive): > > a100 MB / > > b128 MB swap > > c1.1 GB > > d256 MB /tmp > > e ~640 MB /var > > > > wd1 (