Re: nsswitch

2005-11-14 Thread Aiko Barz
Adam wrote: > What's wrong with just using maildrop's ldap support? I use the current version of maildrop right now. The current version of maildrop dropped the ldap-support in favour of courier-authlib. And courier-authlib is not able to lookup a uid directly at this time. (I checked the code.)

Re: nsswitch

2005-11-14 Thread Aiko Barz
Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote: > By each user having its own UID, you mean each is a local UNIX user account? Yes and no. My users would have a unix-account if the ldap-accounts were visible to OpenBSD. (Nevertheless they are not allowed to login.) > You're not doing virtual user setup with qmail-l

Re: nsswitch

2005-11-14 Thread Adam
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 02:39:11 +0100 Aiko Barz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I googled, but I couldn't figure out the current status. > > My problem: > I tried to move my mailservers from Linux to OpenBSD. It's a qmail- > ldap system with its users stored in OpenLDAP. Each of my users has > its own

Re: nsswitch

2005-11-14 Thread Spruell, Darren-Perot
From: Aiko Barz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > My problem: > I tried to move my mailservers from Linux to OpenBSD. It's a > qmail-ldap > system with its users stored in OpenLDAP. Each of my users has its own > UID. There is only one troublemaker: maildrop. It depends on getpwuid > and getpwnam. But O

Re: nsswitch

2005-11-13 Thread Tony Lambiris
probably not -- but we use ldap here at work, and the auth_ldap in the ports tree works great. Aiko Barz wrote: I googled, but I couldn't figure out the current status. My problem: I tried to move my mailservers from Linux to OpenBSD. It's a qmail-ldap system with its users stored in OpenLDAP.

Re: nsswitch and/or hesiod support

2005-09-09 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
Damien Miller wrote: As in unauthenticated distribution of private account data via DNS? I strongly doubt it. Well, that's what NIS does (unauthenticated distribution of private account), right ? And if you use kerberos for storing passwords, it does not look like such an issue... or am I wro

Re: nsswitch and/or hesiod support

2005-09-09 Thread Damien Miller
Antoine Jacoutot wrote: And what about hesiod ? Was it ever considered to be included ? As in unauthenticated distribution of private account data via DNS? I strongly doubt it. -d

Re: nsswitch and/or hesiod support

2005-09-09 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
Damien Miller wrote: Lots of us would like something like nsswitch, but none of us want an implementation that uses shared libraries to do it. It should be fairly easy to delegate getpw* and getgr* via a local unix domain socket (which works nicely for chroot apps too), but there are some subleti

Re: nsswitch and/or hesiod support

2005-09-09 Thread Damien Miller
Lukasz Sztachanski wrote: On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 10:11:51PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: Hi... Some months ago, a patch to import nsswitch into OpenBSD was post on tech@ : http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-tech&m=110098242313143&w=2 I was wondering if there was any ongoing work on n

Re: nsswitch and/or hesiod support

2005-09-09 Thread Lukasz Sztachanski
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 10:11:51PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > Hi... > > Some months ago, a patch to import nsswitch into OpenBSD was post on tech@ : > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-tech&m=110098242313143&w=2 > > I was wondering if there was any ongoing work on nsswitch or equiv