You just don't get it, do you? It doesn't matter if you're running
Samba or not. Kio will attempt to access those files which it is
Correct me if I'm being ignorant, but I don't remember seeing this
message from 3.8 or 3.9 KDE binaries that I have used (from the
CDs). Is it possible t
from all the mailing-list i read, misc@openbsd.org is the only one which
makes me LOL at least once a day ;)
pls keep the jokes running :)
greets, chris
ps. and to clearify it: i mean mails like the ones from dave f. and
similars *LOL
> giving you the benefit of the doubt. Now that you know what kio is
> for, does it start to make sense why it would access files in /etc
> that pertain to file sharing?
It is interesting to see the leaps in your logic. I do not run samba. It
actually got installed by my mistake an
On Monday 08 May 2006 07:09, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On May 8, 2006, at 6:45 AM, dave feustel wrote:
> > On Sunday 07 May 2006 11:35, Jason Dixon wrote:
> >> I assumed that you would be bright enough to use Google to understand
> >> the purpose of kio (virtual file system library). I was mistaken in
On May 8, 2006, at 6:45 AM, dave feustel wrote:
On Sunday 07 May 2006 11:35, Jason Dixon wrote:
I assumed that you would be bright enough to use Google to understand
the purpose of kio (virtual file system library). I was mistaken in
giving you the benefit of the doubt. Now that you know wha
On Sunday 07 May 2006 11:35, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On May 7, 2006, at 11:18 AM, dave feustel wrote:
> > On Sunday 07 May 2006 10:53, Jason Dixon wrote:
> >> On May 7, 2006, at 10:38 AM, dave feustel wrote:
> >>> After running kde on 3.9 I found the following error messages in
> >>> the kde error
> >
On 07/05/06, dave feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 07 May 2006 16:16, D. E. Evans wrote:
> Why are you repeating your question when you've already been
> answered?
OK I didn't get it the first time. What was the answer?
Google is the answer. :)
On 5/7/06, dave feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK I didn't get it the first time. What was the answer?
On 5/7/06, Darrin Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Window managers such as KDE or Gnome try hard to be all things to all
people. They (and their applets/panel apps/whatever) get their f
dave feustel wrote:
>
> On Sunday 07 May 2006 16:16, D. E. Evans wrote:
> > The question is, if I am not doing anything with those files,
> >then why is kio accessing them?
> >
> > Why are you repeating your question when you've already been
> > answered?
>
> OK I didn't get it the first tim
On Sunday 07 May 2006 16:16, D. E. Evans wrote:
> The question is, if I am not doing anything with those files,
>then why is kio accessing them?
>
> Why are you repeating your question when you've already been
> answered?
OK I didn't get it the first time. What was the answer?
Thanks,
Dave
The question is, if I am not doing anything with those files,
then why is kio accessing them?
Why are you repeating your question when you've already been
answered?
It would be more beneficial for you and us to send patches, after
consulting with the ports mailing list, that better adapt KD
E. Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: May 7, 2006 3:43 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: misc@openbsd.org
>Subject: Re: kde: kio accessing files in /etc
>
> Which window manager(s) do you recommend? I'll try it(them).
>
>See http://www.xwinman.org>.
>
>
Which window manager(s) do you recommend? I'll try it(them).
See http://www.xwinman.org>.
Keep in mind the applications you will be running, and whether they
need ICCCM or NetWM (EWMH) hints, or other dependencies for
certain functions the ports system may not automatically provide.
On 07/05/06, Ilija Liebermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 11:35 -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On May 7, 2006, at 11:18 AM, dave feustel wrote:
>
> > On Sunday 07 May 2006 10:53, Jason Dixon wrote:
> >> On May 7, 2006, at 10:38 AM, dave feustel wrote:
> >>> After running kde on
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 11:31:56AM -0400, dave feustel wrote:
> > My guess is that it's for some GUI stuff or something...
> > Does this behaviour really surprise you?
>
> Actually it does, that's why I posted the question which reflects
> my (possibly naive) astonishment at some of the things I
On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 11:35 -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On May 7, 2006, at 11:18 AM, dave feustel wrote:
>
> > On Sunday 07 May 2006 10:53, Jason Dixon wrote:
> >> On May 7, 2006, at 10:38 AM, dave feustel wrote:
> >>> After running kde on 3.9 I found the following error messages in
> >>> the kde
On May 7, 2006, at 11:18 AM, dave feustel wrote:
On Sunday 07 May 2006 10:53, Jason Dixon wrote:
On May 7, 2006, at 10:38 AM, dave feustel wrote:
After running kde on 3.9 I found the following error messages in
the kde error
log:
kio (KDirWatch): WARNING: KDirWatch::removeDir can't handle
'/e
On Sunday 07 May 2006 10:55, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> On 07/05/06, dave feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > After running kde on 3.9 I found the following error messages in the kde
> > error log:
> >
> > kio (KDirWatch): WARNING: KDirWatch::removeDir can't handle
> > '/etc/samba/smb.conf'
On Sunday 07 May 2006 10:53, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On May 7, 2006, at 10:38 AM, dave feustel wrote:
> > After running kde on 3.9 I found the following error messages in
> > the kde error
> > log:
> >
> > kio (KDirWatch): WARNING: KDirWatch::removeDir can't handle
> > '/etc/samba/smb.conf'
> > kio (K
On 07/05/06, dave feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After running kde on 3.9 I found the following error messages in the kde error
log:
kio (KDirWatch): WARNING: KDirWatch::removeDir can't handle
'/etc/samba/smb.conf'
kio (KDirWatch): WARNING: KDirWatch::removeDir can't handle
'/etc/security/fi
On May 7, 2006, at 10:38 AM, dave feustel wrote:
After running kde on 3.9 I found the following error messages in
the kde error
log:
kio (KDirWatch): WARNING: KDirWatch::removeDir can't handle
'/etc/samba/smb.conf'
kio (KDirWatch): WARNING: KDirWatch::removeDir can't handle
'/etc/security/fil
21 matches
Mail list logo
