2009/3/24 Jacob Meuser :
>> > I only got feedback from one person about swfdec update/sndio backend
>> > addition.
>>
>> do you read that as no interest in said port?
>
> somewhat.
>
> --
> jake...@sdf.lonestar.org
> SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
>
>
Sorry, I had downlo
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 05:19:22AM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> Actually I am interested in Flash support for work, so if you send
> me the diff I can try it out. I can't find it in my email archive.
> Or were you just looking for interested parties before making a
> diff?
The diff was sen
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 03:02:44AM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 05:22:34PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Jacob Meuser
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 03:39:41PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 05:22:34PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Jacob Meuser
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 03:39:41PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Nick Guenther wrote:
> >> > Also, youtube matters. This is go
I've been using this for a month or two:
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/34765
Works for more than just youtube also. Maybe I'm lazy but it's much
easier than going to a shell and using yt or youtube-dl.
Matthias Kilian wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 03:39:41PM -0700, patrick keshishian w
Thank you! And there's way more video sites than just youtube, and not
all of them are as rip-happy as it.
But flash support is only a small part of browsers and not really the point.
-Nick
On 23/03/2009, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 03:39:41PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 03:39:41PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Nick Guenther wrote:
>> > Also, youtube matters. This is going to get me flamed but a lot of
>> > worthwhile content is in form of video n
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 03:39:41PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Nick Guenther wrote:
> > Also, youtube matters. This is going to get me flamed but a lot of
> > worthwhile content is in form of video now and not making that work
> > disenfranchises yourself.
>
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 03:39:41PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
> There are methods of fetching just the video off youtube if that's all
> you want. I think I've even seen at least two scripts in ports that
> just do that (www/youtube-dl is one and the other I can't recall its
> names off top o
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Nick Guenther wrote:
> Also, youtube matters. This is going to get me flamed but a lot of
> worthwhile content is in form of video now and not making that work
> disenfranchises yourself.
There are methods of fetching just the video off youtube if that's all
you w
I am no fan of firefox at all. I wish day and night it would work
without sucking so hard all the time. But tweak headers? Random
metacruft? That's feature creep too, just from a programmer's
perspective -- which is even worse if you want people to take it up
and use it and thus work out the bugs y
Hi Chris,
very probably, you are not describing a bug, but the following feature.
Chris wrote on Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 02:15:10PM +1100:
> When I start firefox (3.0.6) from the xterm shell, I get two firefox
> starting at the same time.
Very probably, you are not getting two firefox processes,
b
2009/3/23 Chris :
> When I start firefox (3.0.6) from the xterm shell, I get two firefox
> starting at the same time. If I close one of them (by doing File -
> Exit), it closes both of them. I have the same behavior from two
> different window managers: awesome and scrotwm.
>
> Has anyone else seen
13 matches
Mail list logo
