Re: date not respect for 5.8 and 5.9

2016-04-01 Thread bytevolcano
Like, because OpenBSD is for, like, REBELS, mn! Which is like, totally gnarly dude! On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:58:00 +0200 "Max Power" wrote: > Hi guys! > Why the release 5.8 and 5.9 did not comply with the canonical date > of the 1th November and of the 1th May? > > Thanks in advance for your

Re: date not respect for 5.8 and 5.9

2016-03-31 Thread Vivek Vinod
‎OpenBSD is based out of Canada. They run their power stations on renewable energy. This climate change is a big threat, though it worked in our favour this time. Climate change caused heavy winds, which made the wind turbines turn a bit faster, generating a lot of power.  Canadian power equipmen

Re: date not respect for 5.8 and 5.9

2016-03-31 Thread Daniel Ouellet
On 3/31/16 4:58 AM, Max Power wrote: > Hi guys! > Why the release 5.8 and 5.9 did not comply with the canonical date > of the 1th November and of the 1th May? > > Thanks in advance for your reply. Because Buffy swim upstream with the salmons this year in the cold rivers of Canada and felt he coul

Re: date not respect for 5.8 and 5.9

2016-03-31 Thread Otto Moerbeek
Max Power schreef op 31 maart 2016 10:58:00 CEST: >Hi guys! >Why the release 5.8 and 5.9 did not comply with the canonical date >of the 1th November and of the 1th May? > >Thanks in advance for your reply. Because we are Time Lords? -Otto