On 1/3/07, Tom Bombadil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here, here! I agree with Diana! Now go away with your silly questions!
> Why would anyone want to work for you?
E... unemployement?
*pshaw* I laugh at your unemployment! Nothing builds character like
hard work and adversity!
<- he who
> Here, here! I agree with Diana! Now go away with your silly questions!
> Why would anyone want to work for you?
E... unemployement?
y with repeated
infractions, do we always have to jump on someone the first time they do
something 'wrong'?
- Tim
Tom Bombadil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/02/2007 08:42 PM
To
OpenBSD
cc
Subject
Re: Wanted: OpenBSD Systems Administrator
The just gu
On 01/03/07 01:22, Diana Eichert wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jan 2007, Christopher Snell wrote:
And who appointed you list manager? My post was permitted based on my
reading of the rules in http://www.openbsd.org/mail.html.
Chrris
Same person who appoints people like you to respond the way you do.
On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 20:03 -0700, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
> postings and headhunter poop of course ... Why should we chase away
> employers
> looking for experts in our slightly arcane and recondite OBSD environment?
What about a jobs@ mailing-list?
ciao
Luca
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 02:37:34 -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
>On Tuesday 02 January 2007 13:09, Christopher Snell wrote:
>> Screening Questions:
>>
>> 1. Based on the following statements (props to Lewis Carroll), answer
>> the following questions:
>>
>> a. What can you logically conclude from these sta
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 13:09, Christopher Snell wrote:
Screening Questions:
1. Based on the following statements (props to Lewis Carroll), answer
the following questions:
a. What can you logically conclude from these statements?
b. Explain how you
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 02:37:34AM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> the same time, I see nothing wrong with the occasional job posting to
FWIW, I agree to short posts.
As this list is subscibed to globally, please state if you expect a
person to appear in the flesh, and therefore where the job is lo
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 13:09, Christopher Snell wrote:
> Screening Questions:
>
> 1. Based on the following statements (props to Lewis Carroll), answer
> the following questions:
>
> a. What can you logically conclude from these statements?
>
> b. Explain how you came to this conclusion (bonus
Well if there was a JOB section like there is on NetBSD, that would avoid
this kind of issues.
Just a suggestion...
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wanted%3A-OpenBSD-Systems-Administrator-tf2910166.html#a8135257
Sent from the openbsd user - misc mailing list archive at Nab
Tom Bombadil wrote:
The just guy sent one single e-mail asking if a bsd user wanted a job,
which I bet many among us might be interested.
I've certainly heard from consulting customers who got my info from the
consultants
page at OpenBSD ... It's hard to understand why one can't post a job req
The just guy sent one single e-mail asking if a bsd user wanted a job,
which I bet many among us might be interested.
A bit off topic, yes but if that doesn't apply to someone, bitching just
creates more noise... As it is clearly stated in that page:
"Complaining about and commenting upon spam on
On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 16:50 -0700, Christopher Snell wrote:
> And who appointed you list manager? My post was permitted based on my
> reading of the rules in http://www.openbsd.org/mail.html.
Quoting from the page you cite:
>Stay on topic
>Please keep the subject of the post relevant to users of
On Tue, 2 Jan 2007, Christopher Snell wrote:
> And who appointed you list manager? My post was permitted based on my
> reading of the rules in http://www.openbsd.org/mail.html.
>
> Chrris
Same person who appoints people like you to respond the way you do.
diana
Past hissy-fits are not a predic
And who appointed you list manager? My post was permitted based on my
reading of the rules in http://www.openbsd.org/mail.html.
Chrris
On 1/2/07, Diana Eichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Okay, enough is enough, no more employment want ad stuff.
Funny how I can ignore the stupid lamer posts, b
Okay, enough is enough, no more employment want ad stuff.
Funny how I can ignore the stupid lamer posts, but I find employment want
ad posts deplorable enough to reply.
go figure.
diana
Marc Balmer wrote:
* Christopher Snell wrote:
Hi Folks,
I hope you will excuse the commercial nature of this post; I figured
that this is the best place to find what we are looking for.
looking for people myself, I must admit that I dislike abusing misc for
this a bit, misc@ is for
On 1/2/07, Darrin Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 10:43:51PM +0100, Marc Balmer wrote:
> * Christopher Snell wrote:
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > I hope you will excuse the commercial nature of this post; I figured
> > that this is the best place to find what we are looking fo
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 10:43:51PM +0100, Marc Balmer wrote:
> * Christopher Snell wrote:
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > I hope you will excuse the commercial nature of this post; I figured
> > that this is the best place to find what we are looking for.
>
> looking for people myself, I must admit that I
* Christopher Snell wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I hope you will excuse the commercial nature of this post; I figured
> that this is the best place to find what we are looking for.
looking for people myself, I must admit that I dislike abusing misc for
this a bit, misc@ is for discussind OpenBSD relat
20 matches
Mail list logo
