> Setting the variable to cd path is not useful, because all file sets are
> unpacked by default so you don't need it anymore in terms of installing
> additional packages.
The official CDs have the packages (the CDs you buy and get in the mail, not
the one you burn from install*.iso), so it *is*
You seem to have mixed up packages and the install file sets.
Den 27 dec 2012 17:43 skrev "Live user" :
> On 27/12/2012 17:25, Chris Bennett wrote:
>
>> You are assuming that someone will never just run base.
>>
>> Base includes a lot of useful software all by itself.
>> Apache, PF, a working file
On 27/12/2012 17:25, Chris Bennett wrote:
You are assuming that someone will never just run base.
Base includes a lot of useful software all by itself.
Apache, PF, a working file system, lynx, vi, working X,
ntpd, mkhybrid, cdio, sftp, ssh, sendmail, mg, tons of perl stuff,
manual pages, etc, et
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 04:49:18PM +0100, Live user wrote:
> On 27/12/2012 16:38, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
> >I went through most of the FAQ this weekend and didn't see any mention
> >of /etc/pkg.conf as an alternative to PKG_PATH. Might be better to
> >document the use of this configuration file, whic
On 27/12/2012 16:38, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
I went through most of the FAQ this weekend and didn't see any mention
of /etc/pkg.conf as an alternative to PKG_PATH. Might be better to
document the use of this configuration file, which I think is created
automatically if you install the system from an
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Live user wrote:
> I think 15.2.2 should go before 15.1.1, since if there's no point in running
> pkg_* when the PKG_PATH is empty, which is after installing using the
> interactive method.
>
> Furthermore, using 'export PKG_PATH=' sets a volatile variable, which
On 12/27/2012 10:10 AM, Live user wrote:
I think 15.2.2 should go before 15.1.1, since if there's no point in
running pkg_* when the PKG_PATH is empty, which is after installing
using the interactive method.
there is no 15.1.1. 15.1 is an introduction, no commands where PKG_PATH
would be used
On 27/12/2012 16:16, Yusof Khalid - FreeBSD / OpenBSD wrote:
Hi,
As stated
"It's usually a good idea to add a line similar to the above examples to
your ~/.profile."
The above line should be ok to understand.. IMHO :) or did you miss the
line ?
Yes, actually I missed the point. And I still k
Hi,
As stated
"It's usually a good idea to add a line similar to the above examples to
your ~/.profile."
The above line should be ok to understand.. IMHO :) or did you miss the
line ?
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Live user wrote:
> I think 15.2.2 should go before 15.1.1, since if there's
9 matches
Mail list logo
