Stuart Henderson [s...@spacehopper.org] wrote:
> >>> Heat: The APUs have an innovative design where the CPU heat sink
> >>> is coupled to the case. Since this is typically assembled by the
> >>> customer, a lot of attention is drawn to it and people obsess over
> >>> the CPU temperature. It's a n
>>> Heat: The APUs have an innovative design where the CPU heat sink
>>> is coupled to the case. Since this is typically assembled by the
>>> customer, a lot of attention is drawn to it and people obsess over
>>> the CPU temperature. It's a nonissue.
I've got hold of an APU2C2 now. Agreed - but
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 4:32 AM, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2016-04-19, sven falempin wrote:
> >> This : https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip ??
>
> Yes
>
> > 5 ftp http://download.flashrom.org/releases/flashrom-0.9.9.tar.bz2
>
> No, don't do it this way. Use the port in openbsd-wip.
On 2016-04-19, sven falempin wrote:
>> This : https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip ??
Yes
> 5 ftp http://download.flashrom.org/releases/flashrom-0.9.9.tar.bz2
No, don't do it this way. Use the port in openbsd-wip.
Or if you aren't completely comfortable with this, just use the
vendor'
sven falempin [sven.falem...@gmail.com] wrote:
>
> This : https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip ??
> Like : echo /bin/ksh > /etc/rc.securelevel ??
>
echo sysctl kern.securelevel=-1 >/etc/rc.securelevel
>
> No patch here : wont work ?
>
Get the securelevel right first, then worry about the pa
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2016/04/19 12:33, sven falempin wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Stuart Henderson
> > wrote:
> >
> > On 2016-04-18, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > > On 2016-04-18, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > >
> >
On 2016/04/19 12:33, sven falempin wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
>
> On 2016-04-18, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > On 2016-04-18, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> >> From a different machine though. Compared to APU1 the APU2 has
> 4x
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2016-04-18, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > On 2016-04-18, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> >> From a different machine though. Compared to APU1 the APU2 has 4x the L2
> >> cache, RAM is clocked a quarter faster, twice the number of cpu
On 2016-04-18, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> On 2016-04-18, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
>> From a different machine though. Compared to APU1 the APU2 has 4x the L2
>> cache, RAM is clocked a quarter faster, twice the number of cpu cores,
>> and a few more cpu features (e.g. AES-NI, RDRAND).
>
> For
On 2016-04-18, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> From a different machine though. Compared to APU1 the APU2 has 4x the L2
> cache, RAM is clocked a quarter faster, twice the number of cpu cores,
> and a few more cpu features (e.g. AES-NI, RDRAND).
For the record: The APU2 does not have RDRAND.
--
Chri
Op Fri, 15 Apr 2016 18:12:41 +0200 schreef Christian Weisgerber
:
A "make -j4 build" took exactly 120 minutes.
Using which physical disk type(s)?
--
Gemaakt met Opera's e-mailprogramma: http://www.opera.com/mail/
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:11 AM, sven falempin
wrote:
> I had problem with my USB3 key, but i do not truct the key that much
>
> Use (A)uto layout, (E)dit auto layout, or create (C)ustom layout? [a]
> /dev/rsd1a: 521.3MB in 1067648 sectors of 512 bytes
> 4 cylinder groups of 130.33MB, 8341 block
And finally just after this test, CPU was 104degC according to sysctl, so
if you want to use it, get a box !
--
-
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\
Boudewijn Dijkstra:
> > A "make -j4 build" took exactly 120 minutes.
>
> Using which physical disk type(s)?
A no-name 16 GB mSATA SSD.
http://www.apu-board.de/produkte/datapower-msata.html
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
I had problem with my USB3 key, but i do not truct the key that much
Use (A)uto layout, (E)dit auto layout, or create (C)ustom layout? [a]
/dev/rsd1a: 521.3MB in 1067648 sectors of 512 bytes
4 cylinder groups of 130.33MB, 8341 blocks, 16768 inodes each
/dev/rsd1k: 4554.6MB in 9327776 sectors of 51
http://s4.postimg.org/5ov9malvh/back.jpg
http://s1.postimg.org/qqiiqvfi7/front.jpg
wait for it.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Mihai Popescu wrote:
> > But his point is still valid.
>
> Yes? APU1x is old and tested, so I can bet that benchmarks are readily
> available. It is over-popular al
> But his point is still valid.
Yes? APU1x is old and tested, so I can bet that benchmarks are readily
available. It is over-popular already, full of examples and tests. The
user was interested in APU2x wich is totally different.
> He knew he had an inferior machine but it was still able to satur
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:02 AM, Eric Furman wrote:
> These requests for 'Real World' numbers are almost always
> stupid, because the people asking are almost certain to never
> need the max amount of bandwidth even a modest machine
> can supply. Really? Are you actually considering this box
> fo
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016, at 08:26 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2016-04-15, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> >> That's nice. I don't have a ferrari, I have a rather basic truck.
> >>
> >> You are off topic.
> >
> > Sorry Theo,
> >
> > He asked for
> >
> > "real world through put?"
> >
> > I provided some
On 2016-04-15, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
>> That's nice. I don't have a ferrari, I have a rather basic truck.
>>
>> You are off topic.
>
> Sorry Theo,
>
> He asked for
>
> "real world through put?"
>
> I provided some to be helpful.
>From a different machine though. Compared to APU1 the APU2 has 4x
On 2016-04-15, Heine Lysemose wrote:
> Can you give some real world through put? How much can you push through it
> from a NAT’et device? And what is the device stats when doing so?
This depends on several things. IPsec or not (and how is it configured).
pppoe or routing or bridging. kern.pool_de
APU2 is quite a different product than APU1.
Different processor(s), different network interfaces (using different
drivers).
> On 15 Apr 2016, at 21:49, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
>
>> That's nice. I don't have a ferrari, I have a rather basic truck.
>>
>> You are off topic.
>
> Sorry Theo,
>
> He a
>> That's nice. I don't have a ferrari, I have a rather basic truck.
>>
>> You are off topic.
>
>Sorry Theo,
>
>He asked for
>
>"real world through put?"
>
>I provided some to be helpful.
You provided data from an ENTIRELY DIFFERENT MACHINE.
That is unhelpful.
> That's nice. I don't have a ferrari, I have a rather basic truck.
>
> You are off topic.
Sorry Theo,
He asked for
"real world through put?"
I provided some to be helpful.
e:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail-key; bh=v6TAoSDi
>qhR+xU4jzmiPMESBlnY=; b=YHdaKebjNunl691j7NzsWzplrmJmJYbGkqeGrslP
>S6XoMsgDnVCEAE6Uj7/f3K7QPtUBMhtRliAGzg4RuY3gPJcAsBgJlaA3XiCOn17H
>8Wg1h6JlguPdF/K/ov/7BFHEv/9vdWhCIOItGYs/vUaZ3vip3fHtyEUThpUq/scL Xvo=
>Subject: Re: Quick APU
I don't have the APU2C4, I have the APU1C4
and I can push 80Mb/sec of IPSec on it, way more obviously when I don't
do the IPSec.
My setup use ikedv2 from Rek@
When I reach the 80Mb/sec, well it reach the full CPU utilization.
When I do NAT only the CPU cores ( I have only 2 on that APU1) are us
Hi
Can you give some real world through put? How much can you push through it
from a NATâet device? And what is the device stats when doing so?
Best,
Lysemise
From: Christian Weisgerber
Sent: 15. april 2016 18:19
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Quick APU2 review
I bought a PC Engines APU2 thi
Otto Moerbeek writes:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 06:12:41PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>
>> I bought a PC Engines APU2 this week and thought I'd write up my
>> impressions.
>>
>> TL;DR: Recommended.
>>
>> The obvious point of reference is the Soekris net6501. Now, that
>> comparison isn
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 06:12:41PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> I bought a PC Engines APU2 this week and thought I'd write up my
> impressions.
>
> TL;DR: Recommended.
>
> The obvious point of reference is the Soekris net6501. Now, that
> comparison isn't really fair since the net6501 i
29 matches
Mail list logo
