Hi

Can you give some real world through put? How much can you push through it
from a NAT’et device? And what is the device stats when doing so?

Best,
Lysemise



From: Christian Weisgerber
Sent: 15. april 2016 18:19
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Quick APU2 review

I bought a PC Engines APU2 this week and thought I'd write up my
impressions.

TL;DR: Recommended.

The obvious point of reference is the Soekris net6501.  Now, that
comparison isn't really fair since the net6501 is several years old
and the APU2 is a new design.  Then again, Soekris canceled their
successor model (after stringing along potential customers for a
year), so they're without a competitive product now.  Tough for them.

http://pcengines.ch/apu2c4.htm
https://soekris.com/products/net6501-1.html

Here's what the APU2 lacks: It has only three Ethernet ports instead
of four, no front-side Ethernet LEDs, no PCI-Express expansion slot,
no LOM.  On the plus side, it has two USB 3.0 ports instead of a
single USB 2.0 one.

Performance: Single-core speed of the APU2 seems to be comparable
to the net6501-70 (the fast model), but the APU2 has four cores
instead of two and it has AES-NI, which provides a big boost for
many crypto applications.  A "make -j4 build" took exactly 120
minutes.

Heat: The APUs have an innovative design where the CPU heat sink
is coupled to the case.  Since this is typically assembled by the
customer, a lot of attention is drawn to it and people obsess over
the CPU temperature.  It's a nonissue.  Case temperature is about
the same as for the net6501, where people are far less concerned,
even a "make -j4 build" didn't raise the CPU temperature much (57C
to 64.5C), and the design ensures good heat flow.  Ask me again in
six months how it did in a 33C summer environment, but I expect no
problems whatsoever.

The firmware is still being worked on; it's cobbled together from
coreboot, a MemTest86 module (takes about 1h45 for one pass on the
apu2c4), and iPXE.  It works.  I've booted via PXE, from an external
USB key, and from mSATA.

Miscellaneous: The case is really compact.  The order of the Ethernet
ports is reversed when compared to the Soekris and not marked on
the case.

And yes, the APU2 is fully supported by OpenBSD 5.9.

Overall, I like it a lot.  Compared to the net6501, the APU2 is
much cheaper and more powerful.  Compared to Intel Rangeley devices,
it is readily available in small quantities (like, one) and, to
pick the one that you can easily buy, again much cheaper than the
RCC-VE 2440.

My APU2 is serving as my home gateway now, replacing a net6501.
It feels good to be running an AMD CPU again. :-)


PS: I bought mine from NRG Systems GmbH, Augsburg, Germany, who
    sell convenient board/case/PSU/SSD kits.  Board and case were
    already assembled.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          na...@mips.inka.de

Reply via email to