On 05/06/09 13:33, J.C. Roberts wrote:
I need to collect raw throughput statistics without increasing latency
or reducing bandwidth on 10GbE fiber links,
..
> As far as my understanding allows, I believe the best way
to do this is with a physical network tap connected to monitoring
equipment.
more OT crap
On Wed, 6 May 2009, J.C. Roberts wrote:
SNIP
CORRECTION: "... just a girl with technical super powers, and a lab that
makes everyone very, very jealous."
--
J.C. Roberts
Trust me, I don't have super powers. I just happen to be in the right
place at the right time to get a contra
This is so freakn' Off Topic. :-)
On Thu, 7 May 2009, Rolf Sommerhalder wrote:
SNIP
Arien Vijn from AMS-IX has given some interesting presentations on
monitoring 10GE, also using the Meta / Force10 Networks "programmable
NIC" and a photonic cross connect/splitter:
http://events.ccc.de/congress/
On Wed, 6 May 2009, J.C. Roberts wrote:
[...]
Well, a good number of the 10-Gbit/s Eethernet cards on the market
actually have dual 10GbE interfaces in one configuration or another.
The most typical configuration that *I* have seen is the two bonded
(20-Gbit/s) as a single logical interface wit
> (There is/was a voice/video recording if the session, but I can find
> it right now.)
Here is the link to the presentation Arien held a year later, and this
one has pointers to videos of his talk:
10GE monitoring live! How to find that special one out of millions
http://events.ccc.de/congre
> I need to collect raw throughput statistics without increasing latency
> or reducing bandwidth on 10GbE fiber links, so most of the typical
> methods are out of the question
After re-reading your post(s) and the thread, I am still unsure what
level of detail you need, e.g. what you mean by "coll
From: "J.C. Roberts"
To: "Johan Fredin"
On 09-05-07 05.00, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> If anyone here mistakenly thinks they can actually run *ANALYSIS* at
> these speeds with off the shelf components...
>
> BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Well, depends on what you mean by "off the shelf". Procera Networks
is
On Thu, 07 May 2009 06:10:30 +0200 Johan Fredin
wrote:
> On 09-05-07 05.00, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> > If anyone here mistakenly thinks they can actually run *ANALYSIS* at
> > these speeds with off the shelf components...
> >
> > BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>
> Well, depends on what you mean by "off t
On 09-05-07 05.00, J.C. Roberts wrote:
If anyone here mistakenly thinks they can actually run *ANALYSIS* at
these speeds with off the shelf components...
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Well, depends on what you mean by "off the shelf". Procera Networks is
doing layer 7 analysis at 40Gbps FD with
On Wed, 6 May 2009 10:17:06 -0600 (MDT) Diana Eichert
wrote:
> On Wed, 6 May 2009, openbsd misc wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Diana Eichert
> > wrote:
> >
> >> We use physical taps at work, when I get the chance I'll take a
> >> look at the vendor.
> >>
> >> Also, you really thin
openbsd misc wrote:
>NSA,MI(x)/GCHQ,ASIO and their vendor friends would beg to differ.
That would be DSD rather than ASIO, I think.
(Since we are already wildly off-topic.)
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
Diana Eichert wrote:
[...]
> AKA what kind of money you have to throw at it.
Isn't that always the case? ;)
> Ours was the 2nd or third built, you could still get to
> the FPGA with Xilinx development tools. A grad student, Jonathon
> Donaldson, working in our organization used it
> in the work
On Wed, 6 May 2009, Jeroen Massar wrote:
SNIP
it just depends on
what kind of hardware one throws at it ;)
Greets,
Jeroen
(long live IPSEC :)
AKA what kind of money you have to throw at it. We had
a 10G box that filtered on SNORT rules in hardware. We
purchased it from MetaNetworks, who w
Diana Eichert wrote:
> On Wed, 6 May 2009, openbsd misc wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Diana Eichert
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We use physical taps at work, when I get the chance I'll take a look at
>>> the vendor.
>>>
>>> Also, you really think you can capture 10GE? Chuckle, good luck.
Prett
openbsd misc wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Diana Eichert wrote:
On Wed, 6 May 2009, J.C. Roberts wrote:
I need to collect raw throughput statistics without increasing latency
or reducing bandwidth on 10GbE fiber links, so most of the typical
methods are out of the question (i
We use NetOptics taps.
diana
On Wed, 6 May 2009, openbsd misc wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Diana Eichert wrote:
We use physical taps at work, when I get the chance I'll take a look at
the vendor.
Also, you really think you can capture 10GE? Chuckle, good luck.
diana
NSA,MI(x)/GCHQ,ASIO and their vendor f
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Diana Eichert wrote:
> On Wed, 6 May 2009, J.C. Roberts wrote:
>
>> I need to collect raw throughput statistics without increasing latency
>> or reducing bandwidth on 10GbE fiber links, so most of the typical
>> methods are out of the question (i.e. like bridging, S
On Wed, 6 May 2009, J.C. Roberts wrote:
I need to collect raw throughput statistics without increasing latency
or reducing bandwidth on 10GbE fiber links, so most of the typical
methods are out of the question (i.e. like bridging, SPAN sessions on a
switch, ...). As far as my understanding allow
Hello jcr,
Not quite sure if this would meet your needs, but you could look at anue
systems :
http://www.anuesystems.com
Cheers,
Simon.
On Wed May 6 13:33 , "J.C. Roberts" sent:
I need to collect raw throughput statistics without increasing
latency
or reducing bandwidth on 10GbE fiber li
20 matches
Mail list logo
