On 28.11.20 05:51, Nick Holland wrote:
> I've heard that from a lot of people.
> And yet, those same people, when pressed, will tell you that a ZFS-equipped
> system will crash much more often than simpler file systems. That's one
> heck of a real penalty to pay for a theoretical advantage.
>
> I'
On 2020-11-27 16:03, Karel Gardas wrote:
,,,
> To me this looks like too much pray for luck. With such amount of data,
> I would stay with ZFS...
I've heard that from a lot of people.
And yet, those same people, when pressed, will tell you that a ZFS-equipped
system will crash much more often tha
Nice experiment, but I hope you don't do that in production nor
somewhere where data integrity is needed.
Your SAS drives, what does their maker claim about "nonrecoverable read
errors per bits read" for example?
As an example let's look on 6TB seagate, 10^15 read bits per one
nonrecoverable
> On 15 Nov 2020, at 20:57, Kenneth Gober wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 8:59 AM Mischa wrote:
>
>> On 15 Nov at 14:52, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>>> fsck wil get slower once you start filling it, but since your original
>>> fs had about 104k files it expect it not getting too bad. If the speed
>>
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 02:57:49PM -0500, Kenneth Gober wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 8:59 AM Mischa wrote:
>
> > On 15 Nov at 14:52, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > fsck wil get slower once you start filling it, but since your original
> > > fs had about 104k files it expect it not getting too b
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 8:59 AM Mischa wrote:
> On 15 Nov at 14:52, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > fsck wil get slower once you start filling it, but since your original
> > fs had about 104k files it expect it not getting too bad. If the speed
> > for your usecase is good as well I guess you should b
On 15 Nov at 14:52, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 02:43:03PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
>
> > On 15 Nov at 14:25, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 02:14:47PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 15 Nov at 13:04, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2020
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 02:43:03PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> On 15 Nov at 14:25, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 02:14:47PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> >
> > > On 15 Nov at 13:04, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 05:59:37PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > >
> > >
On 15 Nov at 14:25, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 02:14:47PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
>
> > On 15 Nov at 13:04, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 05:59:37PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 04:59:22PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> > > >
>
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 02:14:47PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> On 15 Nov at 13:04, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 05:59:37PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 04:59:22PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 14 Nov at 15:54, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > >
On 15 Nov at 13:04, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 05:59:37PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 04:59:22PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> >
> > > On 14 Nov at 15:54, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 03:13:57PM +0100, Leo Unglaub wrote:
> > > >
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 05:59:37PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 04:59:22PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
>
> > On 14 Nov at 15:54, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 03:13:57PM +0100, Leo Unglaub wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey,
> > > > my largest filesystem with OpenBS
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 04:59:22PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> On 14 Nov at 15:54, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 03:13:57PM +0100, Leo Unglaub wrote:
> >
> > > Hey,
> > > my largest filesystem with OpenBSD on it is 12TB and for the minimal
> > > usecase
> > > i have it works fine.
On 14 Nov at 16:49, Johan Huldtgren wrote:
> hello,
>
> On 2020-11-14 13:50, Mischa wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am currently in the process of building a large filesystem with
> > 12 x 6TB 3.5" SAS in raid6, effectively ~55TB of storage, to serve as a
> > central, mostly download, platform with
On 14 Nov at 15:54, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 03:13:57PM +0100, Leo Unglaub wrote:
>
> > Hey,
> > my largest filesystem with OpenBSD on it is 12TB and for the minimal usecase
> > i have it works fine. I did not loose any data or so. I have it mounted with
> > the following fl
hello,
On 2020-11-14 13:50, Mischa wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am currently in the process of building a large filesystem with
> 12 x 6TB 3.5" SAS in raid6, effectively ~55TB of storage, to serve as a
> central, mostly download, platform with around 100 concurrent
> connections.
>
> The current syste
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 03:13:57PM +0100, Leo Unglaub wrote:
> Hey,
> my largest filesystem with OpenBSD on it is 12TB and for the minimal usecase
> i have it works fine. I did not loose any data or so. I have it mounted with
> the following flags:
>
> > local, noatime, nodev, noexec, nosuid, sof
Hey,
my largest filesystem with OpenBSD on it is 12TB and for the minimal
usecase i have it works fine. I did not loose any data or so. I have it
mounted with the following flags:
local, noatime, nodev, noexec, nosuid, softdep
The only thing i should mention is that one time the server cras
18 matches
Mail list logo
