Re: Group editing

2006-05-18 Thread Alexey Vatchenko
stupidmail4me wrote: > i agree, but it's not working. > > # mkdir /webpage > # chown user1:webdev /webpage > # chmod 2775 /webpage > # ls -ld /webpage > - drwxrwsr-x 2 user1webdev 512 May 17 15:49 > webpage > # cd /webpage > # touch file > # ls -l file > - -rw-r--r-- 1 user1 webdev 0 M

Re: Group editing

2006-05-18 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 10:59:10AM -0700, stupidmail4me wrote: > I've thought about this yes, but the developers aren't > that tech savvy to understand cvs. They'll most likely > be using FTP. I know I know, use cvs. FWIW, and I am not the first to say this, but CVS really is better. As a small t

Re: Group editing

2006-05-17 Thread Eric Johnson
On Wed, 17 May 2006 10:59:10 -0700 (PDT) stupidmail4me <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've thought about this yes, but the developers aren't > that tech savvy to understand cvs. They'll most likely > be using FTP. I know I know, use cvs. If they can't grok cvs, are you sure you really want to let t

Re: Group editing

2006-05-17 Thread stupidmail4me
i agree, but it's not working. # mkdir /webpage # chown user1:webdev /webpage # chmod 2775 /webpage # ls -ld /webpage - drwxrwsr-x 2 user1webdev 512 May 17 15:49 webpage # cd /webpage # touch file # ls -l file - -rw-r--r-- 1 user1 webdev 0 May 17 15:50 file not what i want or expect?

Re: Group editing

2006-05-17 Thread Eric Pancer
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 12:10:27 -0700, stupidmail4me proclaimed... > That's exactly what I was trying to do, but I can't > get chmod to work as I want it to. Any help? Um, it's really not difficult if you read the manpage for chmod. $ chmod g+s /var/www/html/this/is/a/dir/

Re: Group editing

2006-05-17 Thread L. V. Lammert
At 10:59 AM 5/17/2006 -0700, stupidmail4me wrote: I've thought about this yes, but the developers aren't that tech savvy to understand cvs. They'll most likely be using FTP. I know I know, use cvs. How about one of the GUI CVS clients? They can be setup just like most ftp programs, .. and nobo

Re: Group editing

2006-05-17 Thread stupidmail4me
That's exactly what I was trying to do, but I can't get chmod to work as I want it to. Any help? --- Eric Pancer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 08:28:28 -0700, stupidmail4me > proclaimed... > > > I've created a website. Let's say it's in > /website. > > > > What's the best w

Re: Group editing

2006-05-17 Thread Eric Pancer
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 08:28:28 -0700, stupidmail4me proclaimed... > I've created a website. Let's say it's in /website. > > What's the best way to give all 10 developers access > to those files? I can create a group called > webdevelopers and have that group own /website. I can > also change perm

Re: Group editing

2006-05-17 Thread stupidmail4me
I've thought about this yes, but the developers aren't that tech savvy to understand cvs. They'll most likely be using FTP. I know I know, use cvs. --- Olivier Mehani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 08:28:28AM -0700, > stupidmail4me wrote: > > What's the best way to give all

Re: Group editing

2006-05-17 Thread Matthew Weigel
stupidmail4me wrote: I've created a website. Let's say it's in /website. What's the best way to give all 10 developers access to those files? CVS. Maybe Subversion, or some other SCM system. 10 developers is enough to get complicated, they'll probably need a little help not stepping on each

Re: Group editing

2006-05-17 Thread Olivier Mehani
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 08:28:28AM -0700, stupidmail4me wrote: > What's the best way to give all 10 developers access > to those files? I can create a group called > webdevelopers and have that group own /website. I can > also change permissions to 775 on that directory so > that they can create fi