I think if you really want it,
you can make it. ;) On Thursday, August 29, 2024 at 10:43:48 p.m. GMT+9,
wrote:
We need an XFCE desktop version of OpenBSD.
Ready configured. Or alternatives to buy
such a system.
Дана 24/08/30 02:28AM, Karsten Pedersen написа:
> Slight nitpick, but the default is fvwm(1) based on what launches if
> your user account has no custom ~/.xinitrc or ~/.xsession.
>
> For cwm(1) or twm(1), these need to be specified manually.
I stand partially corrected. The actual "default" in
Дана 24/08/29 03:18AM, openbsd_fr...@mail2tor.com написа:
> We need an XFCE desktop version of OpenBSD.
> Ready configured. Or alternatives to buy
> such a system.
OpenBSD is not GNU/Linux. It doesn't have "versions" or "flavors" with
desktop environments installed by default (in contrast with, fo
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 03:18:10AM GMT, openbsd_fr...@mail2tor.com wrote:
> We need an XFCE desktop version of OpenBSD.
> Ready configured. Or alternatives to buy
> such a system.
Why? What's the use if you haven't gotten past your USB installation
problems in your two previous emails?
Or did you
On Sun, 05 May 2024 21:52:11 +0200,
Bodie wrote:
>
> openfiles is very questionable, did you measure with fstat(1) how many of
> them do you have when you run Firefox or Chrome or did you have any errors
> in logs regarding exhausting that limit?
>
I run my desktop with default settings (512) an
On 4.5.2024 21:20, Manfred Koch wrote:
Hi,
There is no problems with performance, only tested the settings,
nevertheless I will
undo the changes to the default .
I appreciate your recommendations.
By the way the website
https://www.nechtan.io/articles/openbsd_minimalist_desktop.html
comes wit
Hello list,
thank you for all your replies to this subject.
Manfred
On 5/5/24 03:29, Chris Petrik wrote:
Hello,
The best docs I've seen are the ones in OpenBSD they praise to provide very
nice docs, Linux by fare sucks in this regard the issue is most people who
provide howtos are just kid
Hello,
The best docs I've seen are the ones in OpenBSD they praise to provide very
nice docs, Linux by fare sucks in this regard the issue is most people who
provide howtos are just kids who try to setup a web server and document how
they did it, as well as you get 45 people replying the same o
On Sat, 04 May 2024 22:32:46 +0200,
Chris Bennett wrote:
>
> My luck with web searches is about zero. Even swapping to different
> search engines just gives me crap that's too old or ridiculously wrong.
>
I have a strong feeling that LLM models adds too much "new" text that makes
the OpenBSD co
On Sat, May 04, 2024 at 06:19:54PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> Hm. Back in the day I did some conference tutorials on "transition to the most
> recent OpenBSD release", with some desktop/laptop oriented tweaks I had found
> useful myself. Some of those tweaks may still apply, but some are
Hi,
There is no problems with performance, only tested the settings,
nevertheless I will
undo the changes to the default .
I appreciate your recommendations.
By the way the website
https://www.nechtan.io/articles/openbsd_minimalist_desktop.html
comes with the desktop suggestion.
By then and
On Sat, May 04, 2024 at 03:41:28PM +0200, Manfred Koch wrote:
> These specifications origin from a website
>
> I could need your judgments to these settings, so that I can use it.
It would be interesting to hear which website recommended those settings, just
for reference.
It's hard to come up w
On Sat, May 4, 2024, at 8:41 AM, Manfred Koch wrote:
> Hi community,
>
> I'm a newbie and have a few questions according performance in
> workstation. The following changes I've made in sysctl.conf:
> kern.maxproc=4096
> kern.maxthread=4096
> kern.maxfiles=32768
>
> further in the login.conf:
>
> s
Recoll looks good. So I have found 70k files just in my work repos. I
have been using find and grep -R. But obviously not enough. My mail is
in maildir format and I use mu4e on emacs, it has all the email indexed
and performing a search is pretty quick.
Testing omindex and quest from xapian-om
Recoll is the best I have found.
I porting recoll three years ago but never submitted it. It should be easier to
port now, as my patches are supposedly upstreamed or otherwise made obselete.
https://thomaslevine.com/scm/openbsd-configuration/dir?ci=c7b4651cb41d5d30&name=openbsd/usr/ports/mystuff/t
Hi,
the silver searcher and ripgrep are faster than grep for example.
--
Regards,
Ville
On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 6.36, Charlie Burnett wrote:
> Try pdfgrep and catdoc in ports/pkg for documents I’d say, you could
> probably rig up a simple shell script to do it automatically...
> unfortunately d
Try pdfgrep and catdoc in ports/pkg for documents I’d say, you could
probably rig up a simple shell script to do it automatically...
unfortunately don’t know what program(s) would be faster than grep?
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 3:26 PM Oriol Demaria wrote:
> Exactly I do the same... but is falling
hello,
> use Gnome or KDE so I was wondering what do people use for this. Been
> looking at the ports and I see Xapian and others. Any advice on a nice
> setup?
i have the same problem with both code and documentation. i installed
dezi (https://metacpan.org/pod/distribution/Dezi/bin/dezi) and mod
Something more general. Code is mostly puppet, perl, python, and some
other stuff. And files like PDF, text, need to index them and find
something quick from terminal. Might have a look at this, I see that we
have it on ports:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/os-xapianomega/
---
Ori
On Sep 18, 2019 10:37 AM, Oriol Demaria wrote:
>
> So finding some code between large amounts of repos can be tricky. I
> don't use Gnome or KDE so I was wondering what do people use for this.
> Been looking at the ports and I see Xapian and others. Any advice on a
> nice setup?
>
> Regards,
Ok, thanks a lot for your patience with this !
> The kinds of attacks you're talking about--bad emails, trojan web
pages, etc. may seem like remote attacks, but from an OS standpoint,
they're really not: they originate someplace else, but they trick
users into doing something locally, and they nee
On 5/26/05, Stephan Wehner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks a lot for your reply. -- Are you saying there is too much
> overhead or the end result is not worth any overhead??
>
> Why bother chrooting apache, for example, and not leaving it with your
> recommended systrace?
>
> My question is m
Thanks a lot for your reply. -- Are you saying there is too much
overhead or the end result is not worth any overhead??
Why bother chrooting apache, for example, and not leaving it with your
recommended systrace?
My question is motivated by exploits through Internet access; it seems
to me server
Stephan Wehner wrote:
> Mainly I'm worried about running a lot of user applications which
> connect to the Internet. But I can't estimate the overhead.
>
choose wisely your applications and systrace(1) would most likely give
you some extra security.
> Please don't reply to a message when starting a new thread.
Ok.
> What problem are you trying to solve? If the user is chrooted into the
> home directory, what programs would they run?
No, I had in mind all home directories set below an extra root:
/separate/usr/... /separate/etc... and /se
Stephan Wehner wrote:
Does it make sense to run the "Desktop" (e.g., X11 / Gnome / clients)
chroot'ed? Non-technical users can live without all the rest.
Please don't reply to a message when starting a new thread.
What problem are you trying to solve? If the user is chrooted into the
home di
26 matches
Mail list logo
