Hi,
On Friday, 16. March 2007 23:41, Jeremy Huiskamp wrote:
...
> Um, no. If you apply the errata to -release you have -release + errata.
> There are things in stable that are not in the errata, albeit not much.
> Tracking -stable requires using cvs which, frankly is much easier than
> patching -
On 3/16/07, Tobias Weisserth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On Friday, 16. March 2007 21:04, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
...
> Thanks, this is a much better explanation than in FAQ sec. 5. The
> explanation in FAQ doesn't mention the fact that not only the -current, but
> also the -stable is a moving t
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 01:31:33PM -0800, smith wrote:
> OpenBSD developers add code and fix bugs using a program called CVS. CVS has
> the ability to create branches like a tree. The main tree trunk is -current.
> After a certain amount of time, usually a couple of months before the release
>
On 16-Mar-07, at 4:52 PM, Tobias Weisserth wrote:
Hi,
On Friday, 16. March 2007 21:04, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
...
Thanks, this is a much better explanation than in FAQ sec. 5. The
explanation in FAQ doesn't mention the fact that not only the -
current, but
also the -stable is a moving target,
Karel Kulhavy wrote on Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:04:50PM +0100:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 01:33:36PM +0100, Vincent GROSS wrote:
>> ok, I'll try to be clear :
[...]
>> so, in term of patching,
>> release + errata = stable and
>> release < stable < current
>
> Thanks, this is a much better expl
On 3/16/07, Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
Thanks, this is a much better explanation than in FAQ sec. 5. The explanation
in FAQ doesn't mention the fact that not only the -current, but also the
-stable is a moving target, though a slowly moving one.
Now I have 4.0-release and want
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:04:50 +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote
> Thanks, this is a much better explanation than in FAQ sec. 5. The explanation
> in FAQ doesn't mention the fact that not only the -current, but also
> the -stable is a moving target, though a slowly moving one.
>
> Now I have 4.0-release a
Hi,
On Friday, 16. March 2007 21:04, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
...
> Thanks, this is a much better explanation than in FAQ sec. 5. The
> explanation in FAQ doesn't mention the fact that not only the -current, but
> also the -stable is a moving target, though a slowly moving one.
>
> Now I have 4.0-rele
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 01:33:36PM +0100, Vincent GROSS wrote:
>
> ok, I'll try to be clear :
> there is a -current branch (HEAD in CVS technobabble).
> nearly every six month, -current give birth to a release (CDs).
> a release shall move as little as possible. but sometimes, (like now)
> there
* Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-16 12:09:28]:
>
> In other operating system the concept of upgrading is straightforward -
> Windows
> ask you and you press OK, in Gentoo Linux you type a magic sequence of magic
> commands and your system is up to date. But in OpenBSD it seems that
On Mar 16, 2007, at 4:09 AM, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
I am not following anything
That's obvious.
- just installed OpenBSD 4.0 from a CD.
What should
I follow, then?
In other operating system the concept of upgrading is
straightforward - Windows
ask you and you press OK, in Gentoo Linux you t
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Tobias Weisserth wrote:
> A nice newbie site explaining this with examples is www.openbsd101.com, if
you
> don't understand the OpenBSD FAQ.
Thanks for posting that one. It hadn't turned up in any of my searches
and if it was in any documents I already looked at, I must have
> In other operating system the concept of upgrading is straightforward -
> Windows
> ask you and you press OK, in Gentoo Linux you type a magic sequence of
> magic
> commands and your system is up to date.
In OpenBSD, you type a logical sequence of logical commands and your system
is up to date
Hi,
On Friday, 16. March 2007 12:09, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
> I am not following anything - just installed OpenBSD 4.0 from a CD. What
> should I follow, then?
That's your choice.
If you just want a stable and reliable OpenBSD then install -release (that's
what you did). If you want to keep it pa
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:09:28PM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
| I am not following anything - just installed OpenBSD 4.0 from a CD. What
should
| I follow, then?
|
| In other operating system the concept of upgrading is straightforward -
Windows
| ask you and you press OK, in Gentoo Linux you type
You need to read the FAQ :
http://cvs.openbsd.org/faq/faq10.html#Patches
http://cvs.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade40.html
Read the ENTIRE FAQ, because it's there for a GOOD reason.
Marius
On 3/16/07, Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:54:47AM +0100, Vincent GROSS wrot
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:54:47AM +0100, Vincent GROSS wrote:
> On 3/16/07, Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=ContentMod&action=item&id=1703
> >says:
> >Vulnerable Packages
> >OpenBSD 4.1 prior to Feb. 26th, 2006.
> >OpenBSD 4.0 Current
> >Op
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:42:47AM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
> http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=ContentMod&action=item&id=1703
> says:
> Vulnerable Packages
> OpenBSD 4.1 prior to Feb. 26th, 2006.
> OpenBSD 4.0 Current
> OpenBSD 4.0 Stable
> [...]
>
> OpenBSD-current, 4.1, 4.0 and 3
18 matches
Mail list logo
