Re: A patch for cal

2016-06-21 Thread Eric Furman
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016, at 08:43 AM, li...@wrant.com wrote: > Tue, 21 Jun 2016 07:04:25 -0500 jsg > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 07:42:14AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote: > > > On 06/21/16 02:22, Abu Unaysah wrote: > > > > Peace, > > > > > > > > This patch does away with the sixth week-row of each calen

Re: A patch for cal

2016-06-21 Thread lists
Tue, 21 Jun 2016 19:32:15 +0200 Otto Moerbeek > Cal uses the ISO numbers (which is what you describe, the first week > of a year is the week containing the first Thursday of the year)) if > both -m and -w are given: > > [otto@mini:52]$ cal -wm jan 2016 > January 2016 > Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su

Re: A patch for cal

2016-06-21 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/21/16 19:32, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > Cal uses the ISO numbers (which is what you describe, the first > week of a year is the week containing the first Thursday of the > year)) if both -m and -w are given: > > [otto@mini:52]$ cal -wm jan 2016 J

Re: A patch for cal

2016-06-21 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 07:58:15PM +0200, Rune Pade wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 07:32:15PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 07:03:19PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > > > > > > On 06/21/16 14:

Re: A patch for cal

2016-06-21 Thread Rune Pade
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 07:32:15PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 07:03:19PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > > > On 06/21/16 14:43, li...@wrant.com wrote: > > > I think Nick is right, the paper economics

Re: A patch for cal

2016-06-21 Thread lists
Tue, 21 Jun 2016 19:03:19 +0200 "Peter N. M. Hansteen" > > I think Nick is right, the paper economics would mess week order, > > > > Jan 31, 2016 does not belong in the first week, it is in week > > number [6]. > > according to at the conventions the printed calendars here (Norway, > but I sus

Re: A patch for cal

2016-06-21 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 07:03:19PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > > On 06/21/16 14:43, li...@wrant.com wrote: > > I think Nick is right, the paper economics would mess week order, > > check: > > > > $ cal -w jan 2016 > > > > January 2

Re: A patch for cal

2016-06-21 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/21/16 14:43, li...@wrant.com wrote: > I think Nick is right, the paper economics would mess week order, > check: > > $ cal -w jan 2016 > > January 2016 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 [ 1] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [ > 2] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [ 3] 17 18

Re: A patch for cal

2016-06-21 Thread Ted Unangst
Abu Unaysah wrote: > Peace, > > This patch does away with the sixth week-row of each calendar month, > using the empty space in the first row in stead, as is conventional > in most printed calendars. One of the benefits of software is that it is not necessarily limited by physical constraints, li

Re: A patch for cal

2016-06-21 Thread lists
Tue, 21 Jun 2016 14:36:54 + (UTC) Christian Weisgerber > Really, if you want to change cal(1) in a non-standard way, look > at FreeBSD. Extensions I regularly use: > * highlighting of today > * -3 to also display previous and next month > * ncal mode: display weeks vertically > * -A (-B) to a

Re: A patch for cal

2016-06-21 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Really, if you want to change cal(1) in a non-standard way, look at FreeBSD. Extensions I regularly use: * highlighting of today * -3 to also display previous and next month * ncal mode: display weeks vertically * -A (-B) to also display n months after (before) the current one Now that I think ab

Re: A patch for cal

2016-06-21 Thread lists
Tue, 21 Jun 2016 07:04:25 -0500 jsg > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 07:42:14AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote: > > On 06/21/16 02:22, Abu Unaysah wrote: > > > Peace, > > > > > > This patch does away with the sixth week-row of each calendar month, > > > using the empty space in the first row in stead, as i

Re: A patch for cal

2016-06-21 Thread Kamil Cholewiński
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Abu Unaysah wrote: > January 2016 > Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa > 31 1 2 > 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 > 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 > 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 The reason this happens on commercially available, wall-hung calendars is because they are all tryin

Re: A patch for cal

2016-06-21 Thread jsg
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 07:42:14AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote: > On 06/21/16 02:22, Abu Unaysah wrote: > > Peace, > > > > This patch does away with the sixth week-row of each calendar month, > > using the empty space in the first row in stead, as is conventional > > in most printed calendars. > >

Re: A patch for cal

2016-06-21 Thread Nick Holland
On 06/21/16 02:22, Abu Unaysah wrote: > Peace, > > This patch does away with the sixth week-row of each calendar month, > using the empty space in the first row in stead, as is conventional > in most printed calendars. we buy different printed calendars, apparently. > e.g. ... > January 2016