On Tue, Jun 21, 2016, at 08:43 AM, li...@wrant.com wrote: > Tue, 21 Jun 2016 07:04:25 -0500 jsg <f...@speednet.com> > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 07:42:14AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote: > > > On 06/21/16 02:22, Abu Unaysah wrote: > > > > Peace, > > > > > > > > This patch does away with the sixth week-row of each calendar month, > > > > using the empty space in the first row in stead, as is conventional > > > > in most printed calendars. > > > > > > we buy different printed calendars, apparently. > > > > > > > e.g. > > > ... > > > > January 2016 > > > > Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa > > > > 31 1 2 > > > > 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > > > > 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 > > > > 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 > > > > 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 > > > > > > I really don't see a benefit to this, and I do see a downside: Jan 31 > > > comes after Jan 1...not before. > > > > > > My opinion...add $10 to its value, and you can get a coffee at Starbucks. > > > > > > Nick. > > > > My 2 cents,,,,why not if its more in line with industry standards, i.e. > > printing protocol's etc. > > I think Nick is right, the paper economics would mess week order, check:
Nick is almost always right.
