Re: (5.4-i386) framebuffer console

2013-12-16 Thread Adam Jensen
On 12/15/2013 08:16 PM, Adam Jensen wrote: For the sake of others who might also be confused by this, the framebuffer console is probably configured and *on by default* when 5.4-release (or -stable or -current) is installed on machine with an appropriate *intel* graphics device. I say "probably"

Re: (5.4-i386) framebuffer console

2013-12-15 Thread Adam Jensen
On 12/15/2013 08:16 PM, Adam Jensen wrote: On 12/14/2013 04:46 PM, Gabriel Guzman wrote: On 12/14, Adam Jensen wrote: Did you get a framebuffer (no X11) console working with a decent resolution font and [much] more than 25 lines of 80 characters? If so, how did you do it - what's your recipe?

Re: (5.4-i386) framebuffer console

2013-12-15 Thread Adam Jensen
On 12/14/2013 04:46 PM, Gabriel Guzman wrote: On 12/14, Adam Jensen wrote: Did you get a framebuffer (no X11) console working with a decent resolution font and [much] more than 25 lines of 80 characters? If so, how did you do it - what's your recipe? just boot the machine (: no tweaking requir

Re: (5.4-i386) framebuffer console

2013-12-14 Thread Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 04:46:58PM -0500, Gabriel Guzman wrote: > On 12/14, Adam Jensen wrote: > > On 12/14/2013 02:57 PM, Gabriel Guzman wrote: > > >wsdisplay0 at radeondrm0 mux 1: console (std, vt100 emulation), using > > >wskbd0 > > > > > > > Did you get a framebuffer (no X11) console working w

Re: (5.4-i386) framebuffer console

2013-12-14 Thread Gabriel Guzman
On 12/14, Adam Jensen wrote: > On 12/14/2013 02:57 PM, Gabriel Guzman wrote: > >wsdisplay0 at radeondrm0 mux 1: console (std, vt100 emulation), using > >wskbd0 > > > > Did you get a framebuffer (no X11) console working with a decent resolution radeondrm0: 1920x1080 > font and [much] more than

Re: (5.4-i386) framebuffer console

2013-12-14 Thread Adam Jensen
On 12/14/2013 02:57 PM, Gabriel Guzman wrote: wsdisplay0 at radeondrm0 mux 1: console (std, vt100 emulation), using wskbd0 Did you get a framebuffer (no X11) console working with a decent resolution font and [much] more than 25 lines of 80 characters? If so, how did you do it - what's your r

Re: (5.4-i386) framebuffer console

2013-12-14 Thread Gabriel Guzman
On 12/14, Adam Jensen wrote: > On 12/14/2013 12:09 AM, Adam Jensen wrote: > >I noticed on [The OpenBSD 5.4 Release](http://www.openbsd.org/54.html) > > > >"wsdisplay(4) now attaches to inteldrm(4) and provides a framebuffer > >console." > > > >drm supports the radeon driver and I have an old Thinkp

Re: (5.4-i386) framebuffer console

2013-12-14 Thread Adam Jensen
On 12/14/2013 12:09 AM, Adam Jensen wrote: I noticed on [The OpenBSD 5.4 Release](http://www.openbsd.org/54.html) "wsdisplay(4) now attaches to inteldrm(4) and provides a framebuffer console." drm supports the radeon driver and I have an old Thinkpad T60 with: vga1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "AT

Re: (5.4-i386) framebuffer console

2013-12-14 Thread Adam Jensen
On 12/14/2013 01:36 AM, Philip Guenther wrote: On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Adam Jensen wrote: I noticed on [The OpenBSD 5.4 Release](http://www.openbsd.org/54.html) "wsdisplay(4) now attaches to inteldrm(4) and provides a framebuffer console." drm supports the radeon driver and I have an

Re: (5.4-i386) framebuffer console

2013-12-13 Thread Philip Guenther
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Adam Jensen wrote: > I noticed on [The OpenBSD 5.4 Release](http://www.openbsd.org/54.html) > > "wsdisplay(4) now attaches to inteldrm(4) and provides a framebuffer > console." > > drm supports the radeon driver and I have an old Thinkpad T60 with: > > vga1 at pci1