Re: RES: OpenBSD on IBM 3550

2009-04-06 Thread Emilio Perea
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 07:11:33PM -0300, Ricardo Augusto de Souza wrote: > Really? > > So http://www.openbsd.org/i386.html is wrong? No, but you are not reading the whole thing. See this note: (*) Support for devices marked with (*) is not included on the distribution media or in the GENERIC k

RES: OpenBSD on IBM 3550

2009-04-06 Thread Ricardo Augusto de Souza
t; rev 2.00/5.12 addr 4 uhidev1: iclass 3/1 uhid at uhidev1 not configured softraid0 at root root on rd0a swap on rd0b dump on rd0b bnx1: address 00:1a:64:79:f1:5a brgphy0 at bnx1 phy 1: BCM5708C 10/100/1000baseT PHY, rev. 6 bnx0: address 00:1a:64:79:f1:58 brgphy1 at bnx0 phy 1: BCM5708C 1

Re: RES: OpenBSD on IBM 3550

2009-04-06 Thread Chris Cappuccio
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/arch/i386/conf/GENERIC.diff?r1=1.405;r2=1.406 Ricardo Augusto de Souza [ricardo.so...@cmtsp.com.br] wrote: > Really? > > So http://www.openbsd.org/i386.html is wrong? > > Cause we can see this there: > > " > RAID and Cache Controllers > > ICP-Vorte

RES: OpenBSD on IBM 3550

2009-04-06 Thread Ricardo Augusto de Souza
Really? So http://www.openbsd.org/i386.html is wrong? Cause we can see this there: " RAID and Cache Controllers ICP-Vortex and Intel GDT series (gdt) (A) (C) Adaptec FSA-based RAID controllers (aac), including: (*) Note: In the past years Adaptec has lied to us repeatedly about forthcoming docu