theo wrote:
>
> Unfortunately we are still stuck here:
>
> 0. No code being developered, email and wiki discussion, gnashing of teeth
Seems par for the course these days. Blah blah, entitlement, whatnot,
and no work being done.
--zeur.
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
> > What is not good is when you do have a RAID array, the controller is
> > in RAID mode, but OpenBSD doesn't understand the metadata, so it corrupts
> > data on the disk.
> >
> > This is a difficult area. We don't want to corrupt dat
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> What is not good is when you do have a RAID array, the controller is
> in RAID mode, but OpenBSD doesn't understand the metadata, so it corrupts
> data on the disk.
>
> This is a difficult area. We don't want to corrupt data, but then som
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 03:16:44AM +0300, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
> Boasty? I just try to help you to fix this bug by providing the
> information I've found. It's hard to fix it by myself because of the
> several times mentioned reasons. If you don't want to fix it just
> because you don't want I c
On 2017/10/12 00:18, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
> > On 2017-10-11, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 6:28 AM, Eric Furman
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017, at 04:29 PM, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
> I think it'
Don't mind if I jump in.
"Rostislav Krasny" wrote:
>
> Boasty? I just try to help you to fix this bug by providing the
> information I've found. It's hard to fix it by myself because of the
> several times mentioned reasons. If you don't want to fix it just
> because you don't want I can live wit
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 2:57 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 2:43 AM, Mike Larkin wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 02:36:11AM +0300, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 1:10 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> >> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:18:52AM +0300, Rost
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 02:56:19AM +0300, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 2:43 AM, Mike Larkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 02:36:11AM +0300, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 1:10 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:18:52AM +030
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 2:43 AM, Mike Larkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 02:36:11AM +0300, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 1:10 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:18:52AM +0300, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
> >> >> You just lose users and popular
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 2:43 AM, Mike Larkin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 02:36:11AM +0300, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 1:10 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:18:52AM +0300, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
>> >> You just lose users and popularity.
>> >
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 02:36:11AM +0300, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 1:10 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:18:52AM +0300, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
> >> You just lose users and popularity.
> >
> > In this community, your statement has the opposite effe
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 1:10 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:18:52AM +0300, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
>> You just lose users and popularity.
>
> In this community, your statement has the opposite effect of what it is
> trying to achieve. It puts developers off and discourages
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:18:52AM +0300, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
> > You just lose users and popularity.
>
> In this community, your statement has the opposite effect of what it is
> trying to achieve. It puts developers off and discourages them from
> worrying about your problem.
>
> At any g
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:18:52AM +0300, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
> You just lose users and popularity.
In this community, your statement has the opposite effect of what it is
trying to achieve. It puts developers off and discourages them from
worrying about your problem.
At any given moment, the
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:18 PM, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
>> On 2017-10-11, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 6:28 AM, Eric Furman
>>> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017, at 04:29 PM, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
> I
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2017-10-11, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 6:28 AM, Eric Furman wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017, at 04:29 PM, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
I think it's worth to be supported. The RAID mode of storage
controlle
On 2017-10-11, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 6:28 AM, Eric Furman wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017, at 04:29 PM, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
>>> I think it's worth to be supported. The RAID mode of storage
>>> controller seems to be a default BIOS configuration in all modern
>>> des
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 6:28 AM, Eric Furman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017, at 04:29 PM, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
>> I think it's worth to be supported. The RAID mode of storage
>> controller seems to be a default BIOS configuration in all modern
>> desktop computers. I think most desktop users don
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017, at 12:28, Eric Furman wrote:
>
> I disagree, but that's just my opinion.
> And just because something is "a default BIOS configuration in all
> modern
> desktop computers" doesn't mean it's a good thing.
>
To add another case point, at least on his system (HP Z230) it'
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017, at 04:29 PM, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
> I think it's worth to be supported. The RAID mode of storage
> controller seems to be a default BIOS configuration in all modern
> desktop computers. I think most desktop users don't configure any real
> RAID and continue to use their dis
I think it's worth to be supported. The RAID mode of storage
controller seems to be a default BIOS configuration in all modern
desktop computers. I think most desktop users don't configure any real
RAID and continue to use their disks as separate devices. If at least
this RAID configuration is supp
This is kind of intentional, since noone has put effort into making
softraid understand the disk-binding logic found in the BIOS-RAID
sectors. Maybe we should reconsider, dunno.
> I've just tried to install the amd64 OpenBSD 6.2 and it doesn't see
> hard disks when controller in RAID mode (BIOS c
22 matches
Mail list logo
