Hi,
On Tue, 13.10.2009 at 11:33:40 -0400, and...@msu.edu wrote:
> The problem with this is that the interface between the other OS and the
> OpenBSD based code needs to be correct and secure, else there will be
> bugs and people will complain that OpenBSD code isn't good, etc and in
> general, sn
Hi,
On Tue, 13.10.2009 at 16:41:35 +0200, Igor Sobrado
wrote:
> requirements come first, then you can choose the best tools to get
> that work done, not the reverse. why is it so difficult to
> understand?
well... short story: Your definition of "better" may or may not meet my
definition of "b
Cool. Thanks for the excellent info.
Regards,
Barry
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Theo de Raadt
wrote:
>> In my case it has nothing to do with whether or not millions of people
>> use a particular OS but simply that I am constrained to Linux for this
>> project and it is non-negotiable. So I
> In my case it has nothing to do with whether or not millions of people
> use a particular OS but simply that I am constrained to Linux for this
> project and it is non-negotiable. So I could use that as an excuse to
> ignore OpenBGPd but I think it's a nice BGP implementation and I think
> it may
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 04:12:40PM +0200, Ross Cameron wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Marc Espie wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 05:50:58PM -0700, Barry Friedman wrote:
>> > > Hi, thanks everyone for the information, this
Quoting "Ross Cameron" :
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Igor Sobrado
wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Ross Cameron wrote:
>> >
>> > Uhm perhaps to provide a better OSPF and BGP implementation to the for
an
>> OS
>> > that is the OS of choice of millions of users and thousands of
>
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 04:41:35PM +0200, Igor Sobrado wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Ross Cameron wrote:
> >
> > Uhm perhaps to provide a better OSPF and BGP implementation to the for an OS
> > that is the OS of choice of millions of users and thousands of corporations?
>
> users and
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Igor Sobrado wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Ross Cameron wrote:
> >
> > Uhm perhaps to provide a better OSPF and BGP implementation to the for an
> OS
> > that is the OS of choice of millions of users and thousands of
> corporations?
>
> users and corpo
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 04:12:40PM +0200, Ross Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Marc Espie wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 05:50:58PM -0700, Barry Friedman wrote:
> > > Hi, thanks everyone for the information, this helps give me an idea of
> > > the scope and effort involved
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Ross Cameron wrote:
>
> Uhm perhaps to provide a better OSPF and BGP implementation to the for an OS
> that is the OS of choice of millions of users and thousands of corporations?
users and corporations should learn how to choose the operating
systems that best fi
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 04:12:40PM +0200, Ross Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Marc Espie wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 05:50:58PM -0700, Barry Friedman wrote:
> > > Hi, thanks everyone for the information, this helps give me an idea of
> > > the scope and effort involved
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 04:12:40PM +0200, Ross Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Marc Espie wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 05:50:58PM -0700, Barry Friedman wrote:
> > > Hi, thanks everyone for the information, this helps give me an idea of
> > > the scope and effort involved
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 04:12:40PM +0200, Ross Cameron wrote:
| > I don't see the point in porting this to linux. Why settle for second-best
| > ?
| >
|
| Uhm perhaps to provide a better OSPF and BGP implementation to the for an OS
| that is the OS of choice of millions of users and thousands of c
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 05:50:58PM -0700, Barry Friedman wrote:
> > Hi, thanks everyone for the information, this helps give me an idea of
> > the scope and effort involved in getting OpenBGPd onto Linux. I'll
> > look at the OpenSSH project to
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 05:50:58PM -0700, Barry Friedman wrote:
> Hi, thanks everyone for the information, this helps give me an idea of
> the scope and effort involved in getting OpenBGPd onto Linux. I'll
> look at the OpenSSH project to see how the portability is added
> without cluttering up the
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 09:59:08AM +0200, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:12:04 +0200
> Henning Brauer wrote:
>
> > and there's a reason why it is that way - I always found the idea of
> > making a bgp router out of a common unix box by adding a userland bgp
> > speaker only flawe
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:12:04 +0200
Henning Brauer wrote:
> and there's a reason why it is that way - I always found the idea of
> making a bgp router out of a common unix box by adding a userland bgp
> speaker only flawed. many things can only properly or at all be done
> at kernel level or with
Hi, thanks everyone for the information, this helps give me an idea of
the scope and effort involved in getting OpenBGPd onto Linux. I'll
look at the OpenSSH project to see how the portability is added
without cluttering up the OpenBSD code.
Also I am sorry, I did not mean to imply that OpenBGPd i
* Barry Friedman [2009-10-12 19:52]:
> Hi, I'm looking at open source BGP implementations for possible use on
> a Linux-based system. I'm interested in OpenBGPd and I understand that
> it's part of OpenBSD but in the application that I'm looking at the
> only choice I am given is Linux. My questio
* Claudio Jeker [2009-10-13 00:09]:
> While true this is mostly the reason because nobody from outside came
> towards us trying to come up with a portable OpenBGPD similar to the one
> done for OpenSSH. Neither I nor Henning have the time and nerves to fiddle
> around with other systems routing st
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 08:12:41PM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it only works on OpenBSD and any efforts to port it to FreeBSD or
> Linux weren't really successful. The reason is that OpenBSD's routing
> daemons heavilly utilize the kernel's routing stack that has many
> interfaces and fe
Hi,
it only works on OpenBSD and any efforts to port it to FreeBSD or
Linux weren't really successful. The reason is that OpenBSD's routing
daemons heavilly utilize the kernel's routing stack that has many
interfaces and features that are not available in and is not
compatible to other OSes. You
Hi, I'm looking at open source BGP implementations for possible use on
a Linux-based system. I'm interested in OpenBGPd and I understand that
it's part of OpenBSD but in the application that I'm looking at the
only choice I am given is Linux. My questions are:
Are there any projects to create an O
23 matches
Mail list logo
