Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>
> I'm not happy with this approach of delaying all parallel building
> until things are perfect. In practice, a lot could be gained by
> simply marking all ports that are parallel-safe right now (or
> conversely, marking all those that aren't), without attempting to
> Marc Espie wrote:
>
> > > > export PARALLEL_BUILD=Yes
> > > > export MAKE_JOBS=4
> > >
> > > N.B. this does not work with all ports.
> >
> > Yep, does not work with all ports. And I still have stuff I need to fix
> > in make itself before we even think of fixing the ports that don't work
>
>
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 03:18:40PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Marc Espie wrote:
>
> > > > export PARALLEL_BUILD=Yes
> > > > export MAKE_JOBS=4
> > >
> > > N.B. this does not work with all ports.
> >
> > Yep, does not work with all ports. And I still have stuff I need to fix
> > in mak
Marc Espie wrote:
> > > export PARALLEL_BUILD=Yes
> > > export MAKE_JOBS=4
> >
> > N.B. this does not work with all ports.
>
> Yep, does not work with all ports. And I still have stuff I need to fix
> in make itself before we even think of fixing the ports that don't work
I'm not happy with th
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 09:40:33AM -, Pedro de Oliveira wrote:
> Yes, both the kernel and userland compile with make -j.
Works 99% of the time. There are still races in make build, some times
it can fail...
Yes, both the kernel and userland compile with make -j.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 09:51:10AM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
>Yep, does not work with all ports. And I still have stuff I need to fix
>in make itself before we even think of fixing the ports that don't work
>with make -j: some of them don't w
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 09:51:10AM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
>Yep, does not work with all ports. And I still have stuff I need to fix
>in make itself before we even think of fixing the ports that don't work
>with make -j: some of them don't work because the makefiles are wrong, and
>some of them don
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:44:43AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2009-03-23, Pedro de Oliveira wrote:
> > Thanks for that, it worked!
> >
> > I added the following to my root .profile:
> > export PARALLEL_BUILD=Yes
> > export MAKE_JOBS=4
>
> N.B. this does not work with all ports.
>
> If y
On 2009-03-23, Pedro de Oliveira wrote:
> Thanks for that, it worked!
>
> I added the following to my root .profile:
> export PARALLEL_BUILD=Yes
> export MAKE_JOBS=4
N.B. this does not work with all ports.
If you're building a number of ports at the same time and want to do these
in parallel, lo
Thanks for that, it worked!
I added the following to my root .profile:
export PARALLEL_BUILD=Yes
export MAKE_JOBS=4
Someone should add this to bsd.port.mk(5).
Regards,
Pedro de Oliveira
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Pedro de Oliveira
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if there's any way to
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Pedro de Oliveira wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if there's any way to use make -j4 when building ports from
> source? Any obscure option on mk.conf?
>
> Currently if I run on a port, for example: make -j4 install it just uses one
> thread on the makefile of t
Hello,
I was wondering if there's any way to use make -j4 when building ports from
source? Any obscure option on mk.conf?
Currently if I run on a port, for example: make -j4 install it just uses one
thread on the makefile of the port.
Is there any way to pass the "-j4" option to make command ins
12 matches
Mail list logo
