Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > I'm not happy with this approach of delaying all parallel building > until things are perfect. In practice, a lot could be gained by > simply marking all ports that are parallel-safe right now (or > conversely, marking all those that aren't), without attempting to > fix any. >
Well volunteered that man. I look forward to seeing the results, I suspect they will be most useful. :-P -- Si1entDave