I guess this is one of those things that keeps "biting" into you until
you get it resolved. After some experimentation, while I never thought
this would have such an effect--especially with net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=1
and net.inet.tcp.sack=1 by default--the following simple additions to
/etc/sysctl.con
I think I'm going to leave this as an unresolved case--shame though.
I also performed the following:
* Replaced my ActionTec gt701 modem with a Cisco 678 (was going to do
this anyway) and the same issue--Windows is fast, OpenBSD is not
* Replaced xl with fxp and the same issue--however, OpenBSD c
Melameth, Daniel D. wrote:
Kevin wrote:
On 6/7/05, Can Erkin Acar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Melameth, Daniel D. wrote:
Prior to migrating to DSL, this same card was used for a cable
connection and doing more than 1.5Mb/s.
This really does not mean much. It could be a negotiation problem.
Kevin wrote:
> On 6/7/05, Can Erkin Acar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Melameth, Daniel D. wrote:
> > > Prior to migrating to DSL, this same card was used for a cable
> > > connection and doing more than 1.5Mb/s.
> >
> > This really does not mean much. It could be a negotiation problem.
> > Was y
Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 12:50:40 -0500, Kevin wrote:
> > On 5/26/05, Rod.. Whitworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > When you have a modem that will do all the connection stuff I am
> > > amazed that anyone feels the need to do PPPoE.
> >
> > I prefer to have control over (and
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 12:50:40 -0500, Kevin wrote:
>On 5/26/05, Rod.. Whitworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> When you have a modem that will do all the connection stuff I am amazed
>> that anyone feels the need to do PPPoE.
>
>I prefer to have control over (and visibility into) the PPP connection an
On 5/26/05, Rod.. Whitworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When you have a modem that will do all the connection stuff I am amazed
> that anyone feels the need to do PPPoE.
I prefer to have control over (and visibility into) the PPP connection and NAT,
to this end I'm seriously considering getting r
Melameth, Daniel D. wrote:
> > Note that, if debugging is turned on, it would not go above 1.5Mb/s,
> > due to excessive amount of logging, make sure that you do not somehow
> > turn debug on by default.
>
> It is definitely not on by default.
ok, just wanted to make sure.
> > Another thing to
the idle loop problem?
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Melameth, Daniel D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07
> > > June 2005 02:10 PM To: OpenBSD Misc
> > > Subject: Re: PPPoE Download Performance Woes
> > >
> > > I'
pm0 on
boot. I believe (correct me if I'm wrong0 that apm0 is the source
of the
idle loop problem?
-Original Message-
From: Melameth, Daniel D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 June 2005 02:10 PM
To: OpenBSD Misc
Subject: Re: PPPoE Download Performance Woes
I've been hesi
To: OpenBSD Misc
> Subject: Re: PPPoE Download Performance Woes
>
>
> I've been hesitant to touch -current especially after a
> hackathon. Any
> idea if the idle loop fix is in the i386 6/3 snapshot?
>
> Marco Peereboom wrote:
> > Actually I looked at the dme
I've been hesitant to touch -current especially after a hackathon. Any
idea if the idle loop fix is in the i386 6/3 snapshot?
Marco Peereboom wrote:
> Actually I looked at the dmesg and I am almost certain that this
> machine has the idle loop issue. Try -current or wait until brad@
> commits th
Can Erkin Acar wrote:
> Melameth, Daniel D. wrote:
> > I've looked into this further and still cannot determine where the
> > issue lies. Based on some advice, I unplugged the OpenBSD machine
> > and setup a Windows XP machine instead. The Windows native PPPoE
> > client was able to download at 5
Actually I looked at the dmesg and I am almost certain that this
machine has the idle loop issue. Try -current or wait until brad@
commits the errata.
On Jun 6, 2005, at 11:23 PM, Can Erkin Acar wrote:
Melameth, Daniel D. wrote:
I've looked into this further and still cannot determine wh
Melameth, Daniel D. wrote:
> I've looked into this further and still cannot determine where the issue
> lies. Based on some advice, I unplugged the OpenBSD machine and setup a
> Windows XP machine instead. The Windows native PPPoE client was able to
> download at 5.5Mb/s and the OpenBSD machine
Without researching this too much; have you guys tried -current which
contains the idle loop fix?
On Jun 6, 2005, at 8:41 PM, Melameth, Daniel D. wrote:
I've looked into this further and still cannot determine where the
issue
lies. Based on some advice, I unplugged the OpenBSD machine and
I've looked into this further and still cannot determine where the issue
lies. Based on some advice, I unplugged the OpenBSD machine and setup a
Windows XP machine instead. The Windows native PPPoE client was able to
download at 5.5Mb/s and the OpenBSD machine was still stuck at 1.5Mb/s.
A snipp
Juha Saarinen wrote:
> On 5/27/05, Melameth, Daniel D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > For what it's worth, I have been doing this for over a year with my
> > OpenBSD box. Turning on or off the "priqing of ACKs" here has no
> > affect on the performance decease apparently associated with using
> >
On 5/27/05, Melameth, Daniel D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For what it's worth, I have been doing this for over a year with my
> OpenBSD box. Turning on or off the "priqing of ACKs" here has no affect
> on the performance decease apparently associated with using the OpenBSD
> box.
>
> ...so I'm
Rogier Krieger wrote:
> On 5/26/05, Melameth, Daniel D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Adam Gleave wrote:
> > > One possibility is that your modem prioritized ACK's...
> >
> > Thanks, but this is not the case. When having the modem handle both
> > the routing and PPPoE, and disconnecting the OpenB
On 5/26/05, Melameth, Daniel D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adam Gleave wrote:
> > One possibility is that your modem prioritized ACK's...
>
> Thanks, but this is not the case. When having the modem handle both the
> routing and PPPoE, and disconnecting the OpenBSD box, the connection
> works at
Adam Gleave wrote:
> One possibility is that your modem prioritized ACK's...
>
> See http://www.benzedrine.cx/ackpri.html
Thanks, but this is not the case. When having the modem handle both the
routing and PPPoE, and disconnecting the OpenBSD box, the connection
works at it should.
One possibility is that your modem prioritized ACK's...
See http://www.benzedrine.cx/ackpri.html
On Thu, 26 May 2005 03:23:39 -0400, Melameth, Daniel D. wrote:
>Just moved from cable to DSL connectivity at home and decided to give
>3.7's new kernelized pppoe as shot.
>
>My DSL connection trains at 7Mb/s down and 896Kb/s up and testing with
>Internet speed tests, I generally get 5.5Mb/s down a
Just moved from cable to DSL connectivity at home and decided to give
3.7's new kernelized pppoe as shot.
My DSL connection trains at 7Mb/s down and 896Kb/s up and testing with
Internet speed tests, I generally get 5.5Mb/s down and 715Kb/s up.
These tests were done with the DSL router provided by
25 matches
Mail list logo
