* Pierre-Yves Ritschard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-26 09:26]:
> This allows to write really simple programs (ask me for a skeleton),
> you'd just have to write more code to open /var/log/bgpd.sock and
> gather the information needed to answer for the OIDs.
that is the wrong approach.
consider bg
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 18:41:00 -0700
"Aaron Glenn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/24/07, Sylwester S. Biernacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I've looked over for importing bgpd status to snmp to use with
> > 'sofisticated' monitoring system. Hope somebody has similar
> > pr
Sylwester S. Biernacki wrote:
Any chances to add that to the wishlist for next releases?
You'll have to extend net-snmp in some way for this. The easiest may be
to just write a shell script that parses bgpctl output into a MIB. The
more complicated way would be to write a proper extension/
On Sunday, March 25, 2007, at 15:40:18, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> You should create a port or net-snmp flavor of these changes. I even have
> some dirty diffs to have a terse bgpctl output usable to feed into
> rrdtool. I should clean them up a bit and commit it.
Hello Claudio,
I've talked about
Henning Brauer a icrit :
* Sylwester S. Biernacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-25 10:52]:
Any chances to add that to the wishlist for next releases?
I won't stop you from putting sth on a wishlist, but I can guarantee
you I won't be working on anything snmp-mib related for openbgpd (well,
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 10:41:06AM +0200, Sylwester S. Biernacki wrote:
> On Saturday, March 24, 2007, at 23:49:12, misc@openbsd.org wrote:
>
> > sophisticated montoring system with snmp,that is kind of an oxymoron,
> > isn't it...
>
> > there's no such thing as far as I am aware of.
>
>
> Hel
* Sylwester S. Biernacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-25 10:52]:
> Any chances to add that to the wishlist for next releases?
I won't stop you from putting sth on a wishlist, but I can guarantee
you I won't be working on anything snmp-mib related for openbgpd (well,
unless somebody pays me so
On Saturday, March 24, 2007, at 23:49:12, misc@openbsd.org wrote:
> sophisticated montoring system with snmp,that is kind of an oxymoron,
> isn't it...
> there's no such thing as far as I am aware of.
Hello Henning,
it's not exactly what you think :P
I've to configure such system and type
The proper method is to use AgentX; Have bgpd(8) popualte directly data
directly. I'm thinking about writing one for pf(4). I also need one
for Slony and PostgreSQL.
Gotta fix these 4.0 segfaults in snmpd(8) first. No time no time.
~BAS
On Sat, 2007-03-24 at 18:41 -0700, Aaron Glenn wrote:
>
On 3/24/07, Sylwester S. Biernacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi guys,
I've looked over for importing bgpd status to snmp to use with
'sofisticated' monitoring system. Hope somebody has similar problem.
Can you give me some links or tell the way you do such things ?
ps. yeah, I know I c
* Sylwester S. Biernacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-24 17:15]:
> I've looked over for importing bgpd status to snmp to use with
> 'sofisticated' monitoring system.
sophisticated montoring system with snmp,that is kind of an oxymoron,
isn't it...
there's no such thing as far as I am aware o
Hi guys,
I've looked over for importing bgpd status to snmp to use with
'sofisticated' monitoring system. Hope somebody has similar problem.
Can you give me some links or tell the way you do such things ?
ps. yeah, I know I can write my own, but I hope not to be
Christopher Columbus :)
12 matches
Mail list logo
