(although at work I only use 10
Gigabit or InfiniBand gear so even 1 Gigabit is only of interest for my
home setup).
Cheers,
Predrag
P.S. Just for the record I would much rather see WAPBL ported and fully
functional on OpenBSD than NFS performance improvment or even HAMMER2.
WAPBL would actually make a real difference for my firewall/embedded
OpenBSD deployments. HAMMER2 would be nice to have on my OpenBSD laptop
but I can leave without it.
Hi Jan.
On Tue, 9 Jul 2013 10:22:48 +0200
Jan Stary wrote:
> > mount \\192.168.2.108\usr\src\media H:
>
> Details matter. Is this NFS2/NFS3? Is this a tcp/udp mount?
> mount_nfs (as we know it on BSD) offers quite a few options
> that can make a difference. Does the Win client have any
> option
On Jul 08 22:07:53, pha...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi David, hi Jan. Thanks for your response.
>
> On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 09:00:52 +0200
> Jan Stary wrote:
>
> > How is the filesystem mounted on the OpenBSD NFS server,
> > how is it exported, and how is it mounted on the Win client?
>
> the output of mount
Hi David, hi Jan. Thanks for your response.
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 09:00:52 +0200
Jan Stary wrote:
> How is the filesystem mounted on the OpenBSD NFS server,
> how is it exported, and how is it mounted on the Win client?
the output of mount:
/dev/wd0a on / type ffs (local)
/dev/wd0e on /home type
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
> On May 09 16:03:30, pha...@gmx.de wrote:
>> Hi again.
>>
>> Long time ago, I asked about [1] hardware recommendations to build
>> a home file / video server, which streams HD videos for Avid.
>>
>> Quite late, but thanks for your responses.
>>
>>
On May 09 16:03:30, pha...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi again.
>
> Long time ago, I asked about [1] hardware recommendations to build
> a home file / video server, which streams HD videos for Avid.
>
> Quite late, but thanks for your responses.
>
> I bought a raid-controller and an em-network card and re
On May 10 19:22:08, brett.ma...@gmx.com wrote:
> On 05/10/13 14:04, Sebastian Neuper wrote:>> When I look at `top`,
> the CPU stays below 10% most of the time. The
> >> network is 1Gbit/s both sides and switch. So I think I could get a
> >> better performance than 20MB/s while coping files to and a
On Fri, 10 May 2013 19:22:08 +1000
Brett Mahar wrote:
> On 05/10/13 14:04, Sebastian Neuper wrote:>> When I look at `top`, the
> CPU stays below 10% most of the time. The
> >> network is 1Gbit/s both sides and switch. So I think I could get a
> >> better performance than 20MB/s while coping fi
On 05/10/13 14:04, Sebastian Neuper wrote:>> When I look at `top`, the
CPU stays below 10% most of the time. The
>> network is 1Gbit/s both sides and switch. So I think I could get a
>> better performance than 20MB/s while coping files to and around
>> 4MB/s when coping from that server.
>>
>> Bu
> When I look at `top`, the CPU stays below 10% most of the time. The
> network is 1Gbit/s both sides and switch. So I think I could get a
> better performance than 20MB/s while coping files to and around
> 4MB/s when coping from that server.
>
> But where is the bottleneck?
>
> I uploaded the o
Hi again.
Long time ago, I asked about [1] hardware recommendations to build
a home file / video server, which streams HD videos for Avid.
Quite late, but thanks for your responses.
I bought a raid-controller and an em-network card and recycled a
really old pc, installed OpenBSD 5.3 Current on
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 05:53:09PM +0300, What you get is Not what you see
wrote:
> Hi
> I have installed OpenBSD 4.5 on a machine and try to use NFS exports
> on it. But the performance is very bad.
> I have another machine with 4.1 on it whose NFS performance is
> awesome.
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 05:53:09PM +0300, What you get is Not what you see
wrote:
> Hi
> I have installed OpenBSD 4.5 on a machine and try to use NFS exports
> on it. But the performance is very bad.
> I have another machine with 4.1 on it whose NFS performance is
> awesome.
Hi
I have installed OpenBSD 4.5 on a machine and try to use NFS exports
on it. But the performance is very bad.
I have another machine with 4.1 on it whose NFS performance is
awesome. I did the same configuration etc on both machines but what
about different performances?
14 matches
Mail list logo