The following patch from Microsoft seems to restore functionality. Will see in
the following hours. The denial of service remains as a problem on mountd. Will
get a spare pc asap and check ktrace.
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4088776/windows-10-update-kb4088776
On Sun, 22 Apr 2018, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
Bloatware is a luxury I cannot afford on embedded systems with limited
resources where every KB and CPU cycle is accounted for. I would rather
submit my recipe for a proper samba source configuration and have the
maintainer do the compiling of a flav
For the OP with NFS problems: I think it is better to pay for
consultancy and stop talking to yourself on misc@.
Sun, 22 Apr 2018 03:30:50 -0400 Rupert Gallagher
> Read again, you will find everything you need to reproduce the problem.
Rupert, YOU have problems reproducing - PEBKAC your end. NFS works here.
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 08:32, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> We have gone through this before. Some packages need some libraries that are
> distributed as part of the base X install. There is no harm in that. You do
> not need to install the server part of X of that makes you feel better. -Otto
Bloat
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 08:17, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> In that case ktracing mountd might help (as well as (packet captures) to see
> what is going on.
Will get back with the results.
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 05:27, wrote:
> You seem to have some problems understanding feedback, here is some help.
> Cut the crap already. How about dmesg first, then proper problem report?
> @protonmail.com>
@protonmail.com>> Give clear instructions on how to reproduce the problem.
Read aga
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 07:33:06PM -0400, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 17:38, IL Ka wrote:
>
> > I belive NFS is rarely used nowadays, especially with Windows clients.
> > People use samba/smb to connect *nix to Windows in most cases. Samba should
> > be pretty stable beca
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 07:20:18PM -0400, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 19:58, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> > What do you mean by "the server crashes"? Does the complete OS freeze? Or
> > is the OS still working apart from NFS? Did one of te NFS related daemons
> > (nfsd, mount
Sat, 21 Apr 2018 19:25:13 -0400 Rupert Gallagher
> Nonsense.
Hi Rupert,
You seem to have some problems understanding feedback, here is some help.
Cut the crap already. How about dmesg first, then proper problem report?
Kind regards,
Anton Lazarov
Comfortably Dumb (the misc song):
http://www.o
> I use it on osx: it is a crippled version of the original that causes
endless problems with file permissions. Rock solid for the rest.
File permissions are always hard to maintain between Windows and *nix,
because of Windows ACL's and posix permissions differences.
One person on this list mentio
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 17:38, IL Ka wrote:
> I belive NFS is rarely used nowadays, especially with Windows clients. People
> use samba/smb to connect *nix to Windows in most cases. Samba should be
> pretty stable because OS X uses it to coexist with MS oses.
I use it on osx: it is a crippled
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 19:58, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> What do you mean by "the server crashes"? Does the complete OS freeze? Or is
> the OS still working apart from NFS? Did one of te NFS related daemons (nfsd,
> mountd, portmap) die?
I mean that the mountd server crashed.
I had "doas mountd -
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 18:09, wrote:
> Hi Ilya, If it was humble you'd keep it to yourself and not bother
> contemplating, or otherwise using the mailing list to think out loud what
> need not say. Kind regards, Anton Lazarov
Nonsense. Is a Turing award lecture worth publishing? It certainly
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 10:09:38AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 1:24 AM Rupert Gallagher wrote:
> >
> > > This is what I observed on a controlled environment of three "windows 10
> > > pro" 1709 clients.
> > >
> > > The obsd nfs server had a single share:
> > >
> > >
Sat, 21 Apr 2018 18:38:11 +0300 IL Ka
> > I mean sponsors who pay for projects and compatibility updates. I also
> mean broader user base.
>
> IMHO:
> To increase userbase and attract
> serious sponsors attention, OpenBSD needs to be converted
> to "friendly-for-non-IT-people" OS like Ubuntu.
On 18:38 Sat 21 Apr, IL Ka wrote:
> > I mean sponsors who pay for projects and compatibility updates. I also
> > mean broader user base.
>
> I belive NFS is rarely used nowadays, especially with Windows clients.
> People use samba/smb to connect *nix to Windows in most cases.
> Samba should be pr
> I mean sponsors who pay for projects and compatibility updates. I also
mean broader user base.
IMHO:
To increase userbase and attract
serious sponsors attention, OpenBSD needs to be converted
to "friendly-for-non-IT-people" OS like Ubuntu.
Do you want to have polkit and Systemd in base system?:
I mean sponsors who pay for projects and compatibility updates. I also mean
broader user base.
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 10:38:48AM +, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
> What I do not like of obsd is the negative energy of its community. We
> all have a sympatic gene and tend to mirror the social environment. We
> should be mindful of it, and try to stay positive. Another thing I do
> not like is t
Sat, 21 Apr 2018 06:31:33 + MB
> Why are you using ooenbsd for anything but a firewall. Even then its
> lagging way behind unless you deploying in a dentist office. Openbsd sucks
> at pretty much everything else. Sorry I come from corporate real world
> experience not Soho stuff. Use Linux.
Linux kernel truly is the kernel plus GCC plus GNU c libraries, a monilitic
bloatware that requires serious computing power to compile. Clang is a much
better compiler, and linux has serious problems with it. Parts of the kernel
are written into gcc and c libs.
I am currently focused on embedde
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 1:24 AM Rupert Gallagher wrote:
>
> > This is what I observed on a controlled environment of three "windows 10
> > pro" 1709 clients.
> >
> > The obsd nfs server had a single share:
> >
> > /path/to/folder -network 192.168.1 -mask 255.255.255.0
> >
> > When mounting a shar
MB wrote:
> Invest in a NetApp filer and do it the right way. Plenty of options
> spectrascale glfs/cnfs lustre with DNE/IME why struggle with this hobby OS,
> seriously?
>
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 1:31 AM MB wrote:
>
> >
> > Why are you using ooenbsd for anything but a firewall. Even then its
Why are you using ooenbsd for anything but a firewall. Even then its
lagging way behind unless you deploying in a dentist office. Openbsd sucks
at pretty much everything else. Sorry I come from corporate real world
experience not Soho stuff. Use Linux.
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 1:24 AM Rupert Galla
Invest in a NetApp filer and do it the right way. Plenty of options
spectrascale glfs/cnfs lustre with DNE/IME why struggle with this hobby OS,
seriously?
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 1:31 AM MB wrote:
>
> Why are you using ooenbsd for anything but a firewall. Even then its
> lagging way behind unles
This is what I observed on a controlled environment of three "windows 10 pro"
1709 clients.
The obsd nfs server had a single share:
/path/to/folder -network 192.168.1 -mask 255.255.255.0
When mounting a share for the first time, Windows allows browsing the network
to find the resource. This is
27 matches
Mail list logo
