Re: Multiple rtables per rdomain

2024-10-06 Thread John Clendenen
Thank you. My search had not turned this up but it exactly answers my question. On Sun, Oct 6, 2024 at 15:28 Zack Newman wrote: > > Claudio Jeker : > > > > No, this is not right. rtables are part of rdomains. So rdomain 0 has > > rtable 0. rdomain 1 uses rtable 1. rdomain 2 uses rtable 2 and so

Re: Multiple rtables per rdomain

2024-10-06 Thread Zack Newman
Claudio Jeker : No, this is not right. rtables are part of rdomains. So rdomain 0 has rtable 0. rdomain 1 uses rtable 1. rdomain 2 uses rtable 2 and so on. Now it is possible to assign an extra rtable to an rdomain but as you found out there is no tool right now to allow this for any rdomain !=

Re: Multiple rtables per rdomain

2024-10-06 Thread John Clendenen
I am familiar with that article but if anything it reinforces my conclusion. I can assign an rdomain to an interface and a corresponding rtable is created and I can add rtables to rdomain 0 using the route command, but I do no see any way to add additional rtables to existing rdomains other than 0

Multiple rtables per rdomain

2024-10-04 Thread John Clendenen
Trying to wrap my head around routing domains and tables in OpenBSD. I understand their purpose in isolating traffic, but the way in which they relate to routing tables is a little confusing. rdomain(4) states: > The rdomain contains at least one routing table. At a glance, to me this implies t