Thank you. My search had not turned this up but it exactly answers my
question.
On Sun, Oct 6, 2024 at 15:28 Zack Newman wrote:
> > Claudio Jeker :
> >
> > No, this is not right. rtables are part of rdomains. So rdomain 0 has
> > rtable 0. rdomain 1 uses rtable 1. rdomain 2 uses rtable 2 and so
Claudio Jeker :
No, this is not right. rtables are part of rdomains. So rdomain 0 has
rtable 0. rdomain 1 uses rtable 1. rdomain 2 uses rtable 2 and so on.
Now it is possible to assign an extra rtable to an rdomain but as you
found out there is no tool right now to allow this for any rdomain !=
I am familiar with that article but if anything it reinforces my conclusion.
I can assign an rdomain to an interface and a corresponding rtable is
created and I can add rtables to rdomain 0 using the route command, but I
do no see any way to add additional rtables to existing rdomains other than
0
Trying to wrap my head around routing domains and tables in OpenBSD.
I understand their purpose in isolating traffic, but the way in which they
relate to routing tables is a little confusing.
rdomain(4) states:
> The rdomain contains at least one routing table.
At a glance, to me this implies t
4 matches
Mail list logo