I am familiar with that article but if anything it reinforces my conclusion.
I can assign an rdomain to an interface and a corresponding rtable is created and I can add rtables to rdomain 0 using the route command, but I do no see any way to add additional rtables to existing rdomains other than 0. If I am incorrect though, how would one configure an rtable 51 inside of rdomain 50 (for example)? # netstat -R Rdomain 0 Interfaces: lo0 em0 em1 enc0 pflog0 Routing tables: 0 20 Rdomain 50 Interfaces: vport50 lo50 Routing table: 50 Rdomain 100 Interfaces: lo100 vport100 Routing table: 100 On Sun, Oct 6, 2024 at 10:56 AM Gerrit <ger...@macclub-os.de> wrote: > Hello John, > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 12:28:16PM UTC, John Clendenen wrote: > > > In practice, it seems that only rdomain 0 may contain multiple tables and > > that rdomains other than 0 are paired with a single rtable with the same > > number. Additionally that table may not be created again under rdomain 0. > > > > Is all of that correct or am I missing something? > > No, I think you're missing something. Perhaps this article may help you: > > > https://www.unfriendlygrinch.info/posts/openbsd-routing-tables-and-routing-domains/ > > -- > Best regards > Gerrit > >
