Thank you !
> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 04:08:38 +0100
> From: ktulu+o...@wxcvbn.org
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: Kernel without INET6 error on pipex.c
>
> If you haven't subscribed to tech@ yet:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=132218680527474&w=2
Yes, I tried it and it worked.
> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 01:09:02 +0200
> Subject: Re: Kernel without INET6 error on pipex.c
> From: coonar...@gmail.com
> To: misc@openbsd.org
>
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> > On 2011-11-24, Paul Irofti wr
If you haven't subscribed to tech@ yet:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=132218680527474&w=2
Sometimes people ask you do to things,
like a bsd kernel without ipv6 code,
and those guys pay you for doing this (ROFL)
it happened to me, i only have a couple of arrangements(mostly userland) to
do, back in the day (4.8 or something like that).
2011/11/24 STeve Andre'
> On 11/24/11 17:46, Stu
On 11/24/11 17:46, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011-11-24, Paul Irofti wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:09:31AM +, Julien Crapovich wrote:
Hello.
Absolutely, but compiling without INET6 is not supposed to generate error.
I've just disabled INET6 on GENERIC file, not other hack.
This is in
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011-11-24, Paul Irofti wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:09:31AM +, Julien Crapovich wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>> Absolutely, but compiling without INET6 is not supposed to generate error.
>>> I've just disabled INET6 on GENERIC file
On 2011-11-24, Paul Irofti wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:09:31AM +, Julien Crapovich wrote:
>> Hello.
>> Absolutely, but compiling without INET6 is not supposed to generate error.
>> I've just disabled INET6 on GENERIC file, not other hack.
>
> This is indeed a bug. Other people should s
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:42:15 -0200
"Christiano F. Haesbaert" wrote:
> Is there any point in keeping INET6 as removable option ?
> Can't we just get rid of all the #ifdef INET6 goo ?
Wy is it there, untill it was stable?
All I know is it saved me from having to upgrade a firewall and from
having
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:09:31AM +, Julien Crapovich wrote:
> Hello.
> Absolutely, but compiling without INET6 is not supposed to generate error.
> I've just disabled INET6 on GENERIC file, not other hack.
http://cvs.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#ProbIPv6
That should answer your question. The f
On 24 November 2011 10:59, Bret S. Lambert wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:20:29PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:12:10 +1100
>> "Rod Whitworth" wrote:
>>
>> > You are the only one who knows exactly what you did. Maybe.
>> > Why should we waste time guessing?
>> >
>> >
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:20:29PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:12:10 +1100
> "Rod Whitworth" wrote:
>
> > You are the only one who knows exactly what you did. Maybe.
> > Why should we waste time guessing?
> >
> > It's a pretty damn stupid thing to do anyway when it is
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:12:10 +1100
"Rod Whitworth" wrote:
> You are the only one who knows exactly what you did. Maybe.
> Why should we waste time guessing?
>
> It's a pretty damn stupid thing to do anyway when it is so easy to
> block v6 traffic using GENERIC and, BTW, your kernel is NOT GENER
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:09:31 +, Julien Crapovich wrote:
>
>>Hello.
>>Absolutely, but compiling without INET6 is not supposed to generate error.
>>I've just disabled INET6 on GENERIC file, not other hack.
>>
> You are the only one who know
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:09:31AM +, Julien Crapovich wrote:
> Hello.
> Absolutely, but compiling without INET6 is not supposed to generate error.
> I've just disabled INET6 on GENERIC file, not other hack.
This is indeed a bug. Other people should stop bashing.
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:09:31 +, Julien Crapovich wrote:
>Hello.
>Absolutely, but compiling without INET6 is not supposed to generate error.
>I've just disabled INET6 on GENERIC file, not other hack.
>
You are the only one who knows exactly what you did. Maybe.
Why should we waste time guessi
Hello.
Absolutely, but compiling without INET6 is not supposed to generate error.
I've just disabled INET6 on GENERIC file, not other hack.
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> From: s...@spacehopper.org
> Subject: Re: Kernel without INET6 error on pipex.c
> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 21:19:4
diffs might be accepted, but basically: you broke it, you fix it.
On 2011-11-23, Julien Crapovich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm under OpenBSD 5.0, and I would like to compile a kernel without INET6.
>
> # cd /usr/src
> # wget ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/5.0/sys.tar.gz
> # tar zxvf sys.tar.gz
>
> I e
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:49:42 +
Julien Crapovich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm under OpenBSD 5.0, and I would like to compile a kernel without
> INET6.
>
> # cd /usr/src
> # wget ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/5.0/sys.tar.gz
> # tar zxvf sys.tar.gz
>
> I edited /usr/src/sys/conf/GENERIC, and disa
On Nov 23 15:49:42, Julien Crapovich wrote:
> I'm under OpenBSD 5.0, and I would like to compile a kernel without INET6.
Howls of derisive laughter, Bruce!
Hi,
I'm under OpenBSD 5.0, and I would like to compile a kernel without INET6.
# cd /usr/src
# wget ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/5.0/sys.tar.gz
# tar zxvf sys.tar.gz
I edited /usr/src/sys/conf/GENERIC, and disabled INET6 (line 59, #INET6)
# cd /usr/src/sys/arch/`arch -s`/conf
# config GEN
20 matches
Mail list logo
