--On 22 May 2005 23:32 +0100 Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
If it's an IPStream-based ISP (like most UK ones), you are really
in PPPoA land. PPPoE might work depending on your 'phone exchange
and maybe which concentrator you're connected to (this changes from
time to time), but it's
On 22/05/05, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --On 22 May 2005 19:08 +, Adam Gleave wrote:
>
> >> > The MAC addresses are the same (should have though of checking
> >> > that). pppoesvc is not set.
> >>
> >> Does your provider suggest setting one?
> >
> > Heh, my provider proboab
--On 22 May 2005 19:08 +, Adam Gleave wrote:
> The MAC addresses are the same (should have though of checking
> that). pppoesvc is not set.
Does your provider suggest setting one?
Heh, my provider proboably wouldn't know what PPPoE stands for. They
give me username and password, but that
> > The MAC addresses are the same (should have though of checking that).
> > pppoesvc is not set.
>
> Does your provider suggest setting one?
Heh, my provider proboably wouldn't know what PPPoE stands for. They
give me username and password, but that's it. Been meaning to switch,
actually (thin
On Sun, 22 May 2005, Adam Gleave wrote:
> ifconfig -a shows no difference to ifconfig (I checked with diff),
Yes, I know.. It is an old habit for OSes that do cause different output
with/without the -a. The main thing is to see that all the interfaces
are happy/up/active and not deadlocked
On 22/05/05, Jason Ackley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > I forgot to mention one thing, pppoe0 absolutely refuses to connect (I
> > dont' even get it telling me it's not working) if fxp1 doesn't have an
> > ip. Just marking it up doesn't seem to work.
>
> Can you send an 'ifconfig -a' ? (sani
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 11:51:06AM +, Adam Gleave wrote:
>
> reading in pppoe(4):
>
> " Problems can arise on machines with private IPs connecting to the Inter-
> net via a machine running both Network Address Translation (NAT) and
> pppoe. Standard Ethernet uses a Maximum Transmis
On Sun, 22 May 2005, Adam Gleave wrote:
> My question is, do you set the mtu on the box NAT'ing (fxp0, in this
> case), the box connecting to it, or both?
If you are doing NAT and running pf, why not use the scrub feature
instead to adjust the TCP MSS?
It will work much better for you. Man
Hi,
Heres the setup i've got:
pppoe0 (connected to fxp1) - ADSL connection
fxp0 - LAN (NAT)
reading in pppoe(4):
" Problems can arise on machines with private IPs connecting to the Inter-
net via a machine running both Network Address Translation (NAT) and
pppoe. Standard Ethernet us
9 matches
Mail list logo
