On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 08:30:25AM -0700, Bob Beck wrote:
>
> I know of no such mailing list, and certainly Google didn't put me on
> to it when I had problems with their contract.
>
*sigh* a search and a half a dozen click and I was here:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-summer-of-code-me
> I have done GSoC as a mentor before though I have
> not been the admin for a project
Have you dealt with the google contract then?
> Actually, there are a couple of organisations that are willing to act as
> a proxy for the payments to organisations that are unable to deal with
> the legalities imposed by the US IRS - it is not just foreigners that
> have issues some projects inside the US just don't have the ability to
> deal
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Morten Christensen
wrote:
> Am I the only one wanting the tone to be polite and friendly among friends?
>
> I think the only reason why Tomas Bodzar didn't snap the head of Theo or at
least tried to is because every booting OpenBSD on earth start by says
dera...@i38
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 09:08:24AM -0700, Bob Beck wrote:
>
> I'm always willing to try again if this message is read by someone at Google
> who can untangle the bureaucracy...
Actually, there are a couple of organisations that are willing to act as
a proxy for the payments to organisations that
Morten Christensen wrote:
> Am I the only one wanting the tone to be polite and friendly among friends?
>
> I think the only reason why Tomas Bodzar didn't snap the head of Theo or at
> least tried to is because every booting OpenBSD on earth start by says
> dera...@i386.openbsd.org - no small a
Am I the only one wanting the tone to be polite and friendly among friends?
I think the only reason why Tomas Bodzar didn't snap the head of Theo or at
least tried to is because every booting OpenBSD on earth start by says
dera...@i386.openbsd.org - no small accomplishment - hats off!
I started
> at first, I'd notice, "3)" != "4)", right ?
May not be the same, however they do want mentorship from somwhere associated
to the projects.
> at second, taxes are rather government thing, not googlish ? why should I
> sign something with Google about taxes ? It doesn't make any sense.
Because c
6 MARTA 2012 G. 0:15 POLXZOWATELX Bob Beck NAPISAL:
> >
> > they didn't say that Theo refused to sign any paper. Just wonder, what
> kind
> > of responsibilty that paper was about ? Accepting student's code to
> OpenBSD
> > code base or something ?
>
> No, it's actually about personal liability f
> they didn't say that Theo refused to sign any paper. Just wonder, what kind
> of responsibilty that paper was about ? Accepting student's code to OpenBSD
> code base or something ?
No, it's actually about personal liability for the mentor (i.e. me) for taxes
and other such nonsense. Google SOC
5 MARTA 2012 G. 21:55 POLXZOWATELX Tomas Bodzar
NAPISAL:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Kenneth R Westerback
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 07:04:06AM +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Theo de Raadt
> >> wrote:
> >> >> But again. OpenBSD tried at least two
> 1) The OpenBSD Foundation is NOT OpenBSD.
>
> 2) That application never elicited a reply from Google, so no
> contract to read or sign was presented or known of.
>
> 3) At some later point the required contract was obtained and, as Theo
> has said, nobody in the OpenBSD project or at the OpenBSD
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Kenneth R Westerback
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 07:04:06AM +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Theo de Raadt
>> wrote:
>> >> But again. OpenBSD tried at least two times before to apply, but was
>> >> not accepted by Google
>> >
>> >
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 07:04:06AM +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Theo de Raadt
> wrote:
> >> But again. OpenBSD tried at least two times before to apply, but was
> >> not accepted by Google
> >
> > That is false.
> >
> > We were approached by Google "people" to parti
>On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>>>On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Theo de Raadt
>>>wrote:
> But again. OpenBSD tried at least two times before to apply, but was
> not accepted by Google
That is false.
We were approached by Google "people" to par
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Theo de Raadt
wrote:
>>On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Theo de Raadt
wrote:
But again. OpenBSD tried at least two times before to apply, but was
not accepted by Google
>>>
>>> That is false.
>>>
>>> We were approached by Google "people" to participate, bu
>On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>>> But again. OpenBSD tried at least two times before to apply, but was
>>> not accepted by Google
>>
>> That is false.
>>
>> We were approached by Google "people" to participate, but we can
>> find noone in our project who will accept signing
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Theo de Raadt
wrote:
>> But again. OpenBSD tried at least two times before to apply, but was
>> not accepted by Google
>
> That is false.
>
> We were approached by Google "people" to participate, but we can
> find noone in our project who will accept signing their c
> But again. OpenBSD tried at least two times before to apply, but was
> not accepted by Google
That is false.
We were approached by Google "people" to participate, but we can
find noone in our project who will accept signing their contract.
We told them that was a problem. They chose not to fi
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 08:35:03AM +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
>
> Examples of outputs related to BSD are eg. here:
>
> http://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/posix_spawn_syscall_added
> http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/2011/09/15/8368.html
>
> but when testing those you can see that they are most
* Tomas Bodzar [2012-02-29 13:55]:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Jiri B wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:21:21PM +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> >> I did not say that ;-) I'm not a developer of OpenBSD, just user so I
> >> can provide only my view on that. Another question is "market share
> I was still looking for time to ask them about something similar,
> because they are listed as supporter when in fact their page is
> clearly Linux-only.
>
Afraid this is only due to a wish to get higher in the search result
list. I've met such "lame clients" a lot before.
>>
>> jirib
>
--
###
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Jiri B wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:21:21PM +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
>> I did not say that ;-) I'm not a developer of OpenBSD, just user so I
>> can provide only my view on that. Another question is "market share"
>> because there's not much hype around Op
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:21:21PM +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> I did not say that ;-) I'm not a developer of OpenBSD, just user so I
> can provide only my view on that. Another question is "market share"
> because there's not much hype around OpenBSD so it doesn't have
> attention like Linux or wh
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Loganaden Velvindron
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Loganaden Velvindron
>> wrote:
>>> I came across this:
>>> http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2012/02/mentoring-organization-applications-n
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 02:33:33PM +0400, Loganaden Velvindron wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Loganaden Velvindron
> > wrote:
> >> I came across this:
> >> http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2012/02/mentoring-organization-app
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Loganaden Velvindron
> wrote:
>> I came across this:
>> http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2012/02/mentoring-organization-applications-now.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Go
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Jiri B wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 08:35:03AM +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
>> The question is if there's real potential in that for some really new
>> stuff. Personally I think that developers which hacks in their free
>> time work on needed features anyway even
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 08:35:03AM +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> The question is if there's real potential in that for some really new
> stuff. Personally I think that developers which hacks in their free
> time work on needed features anyway even without GSoC and probably
> don't have free summer b
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Loganaden Velvindron
wrote:
> I came across this:
> http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2012/02/mentoring-organization-applications-now.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+GoogleOpenSourceBlog+%28Google+Open+Source+Blog%29
>
> The dead
I came across this:
http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2012/02/mentoring-organization-applications-now.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+GoogleOpenSourceBlog+%28Google+Open+Source+Blog%29
The deadline is the 29th.
I'd be interested in accelerating the port of caps
31 matches
Mail list logo
