Timo Schoeler wrote:
>
> AMD64 or EM64T machine with 8GB+ of RAM (or $1700 to buy one) needed in
> Edmonton. Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having the hardware will help some. I've got access to some larger
hardware here at the university, and have sent out the large mem diff
for amd64 machines. I
>>> Christoph Egger 8-Oct-07 12:54 >>>
>
> in legacy mode, there is i386 that support 4KB and 4MB page-sizes and
> use 2-level pagetables.
> in legacy mode, there is i386 PAE that support 4KB and 2MB page-sizes
> and use 3-level pagetables.
>
> in long mode, there is amd64 that support 4KB, 2MB an
OK guys,
Instead of fighting about using, or not using it, or i386 being
obsolete, PAE not being good, or slow, etc.
I for one would be very happy if we can support more then 4GB of memory
on it and I would be more then happy to test it as I now have machine
that actually have more then 4GB
On Monday 08 October 2007 12:02:22 mickey wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:53:50AM +0200, Tonnerre LOMBARD wrote:
> > Salut,
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 09:44:48AM +, mickey wrote:
> > > > > PAE is slow and has hairy paws. I am glad that we have real amd64
> > > > > machines now so we do
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 12:13:55PM +0200, Tonnerre LOMBARD wrote:
> Salut,
>
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:02:22AM +, mickey wrote:
> > or what you think loading 36bit physaddr is slower than loading 48bits?
>
> I think that loading 48-bits in one step is faster than loading 36-bit
> in two. I
Salut,
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:15:27AM +, mickey wrote:
> > I think that loading 48-bits in one step is faster than loading 36-bit
> > in two. It is also a matter of experience that amd64 memory access is
> > way faster than i386 with PAE.
>
> why do you think that tlb loader cannot load 64
You don't get the problem, at least if you run a decent operating
system, 'cause I know some people having problem using more than 4 Gig
of ram, even with AMD64 or EM64T hardware, and (hum) Vista.
Just to say the arch does not make everything, a good software is also needed.
plus, X86_64 gets rid
Salut,
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:02:22AM +, mickey wrote:
> or what you think loading 36bit physaddr is slower than loading 48bits?
I think that loading 48-bits in one step is faster than loading 36-bit
in two. It is also a matter of experience that amd64 memory access is
way faster than i38
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:53:50AM +0200, Tonnerre LOMBARD wrote:
> Salut,
>
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 09:44:48AM +, mickey wrote:
> > > > PAE is slow and has hairy paws. I am glad that we have real amd64
> > > > machines
> > > > now so we don't need it anymore.
> >
> > besides that what do
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 09:43:25AM +, mickey wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:23:12AM +0200, Tonnerre LOMBARD wrote:
> > Salut,
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 09:14:05AM +, mickey wrote:
> > > > myself in need to build some big, phat machines (8GByte, or even
> > > > 16GByte RAM) for a
Salut,
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 09:44:48AM +, mickey wrote:
> > > PAE is slow and has hairy paws. I am glad that we have real amd64
machines
> > > now so we don't need it anymore.
>
> besides that what do you think amd64 runs? (:
> it uses the same pae as i386. and it is not any faster.
> learn
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:23:12AM +0200, Tonnerre LOMBARD wrote:
> Salut,
>
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 09:14:05AM +, mickey wrote:
> > > myself in need to build some big, phat machines (8GByte, or even
> > > 16GByte RAM) for a customer that run OpenBSD *and* having seen (again) a
> > > discuss
Salut,
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 09:14:05AM +, mickey wrote:
> > myself in need to build some big, phat machines (8GByte, or even
> > 16GByte RAM) for a customer that run OpenBSD *and* having seen (again) a
> > discussion on 'how much RAM is supported' [0] I decided to
>
> PAE support has alread
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:59:32AM +0200, Timo Schoeler wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Hi list,
>
> myself in need to build some big, phat machines (8GByte, or even
> 16GByte RAM) for a customer that run OpenBSD *and* having seen (again) a
> discussion on 'how much
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi list,
myself in need to build some big, phat machines (8GByte, or even
16GByte RAM) for a customer that run OpenBSD *and* having seen (again) a
discussion on 'how much RAM is supported' [0] I decided to
i) write this email to see if there's more
15 matches
Mail list logo
