On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 09:43:25AM +0000, mickey wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:23:12AM +0200, Tonnerre LOMBARD wrote:
> > Salut,
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 09:14:05AM +0000, mickey wrote:
> > > > myself in need to build some big, phat machines (8GByte, or even
> > > > 16GByte RAM) for a customer that run OpenBSD *and* having seen (again) a
> > > > discussion on 'how much RAM is supported' [0] I decided to
> > >
> > > PAE support has already been hacked up.
> > > apparently it was backed out for some obscure stability problems
> > > on certain amd machines.
> > >
> > > and this is (as i see it) fault exactly of these people who wants
> > > this support since when it was asked for the diff received
> > > ZERO testing for large memory use from the list.
> > >
> > > i will repost it again (w/ weak hope) that somebody bothers
> > > to actually test or look at it...
> >
> > PAE is slow and has hairy paws. I am glad that we have real amd64 machines
> > now so we don't need it anymore.
besides that what do you think amd64 runs? (:
it uses the same pae as i386. and it is not any faster.
learn what are you talking about...
cu
--
paranoic mickey (my employers have changed but, the name has remained)
