>Peter Laufenberg wrote:
>
>> My German's rusty but the follow-up article quoting Symantec mentions
>> spyware/keylogging, which has been the traditional "technique" used in
>> in the past.
>
>But that's for targeted surveillance.
They still cast a wide net: on ccc.de there's a detailed report of
Peter Laufenberg wrote:
> My German's rusty but the follow-up article quoting Symantec mentions
> spyware/keylogging, which has been the traditional "technique" used in
> in the past.
But that's for targeted surveillance. The original article refers
to a bulk grep of 16,400 search terms over 37
>car + eimer? ay carambas?!!
"Autoeimer", with unlimited strcat() known to overflow students' brains.
Yes the "Bundestrojaner". I pictured a fat politician's soggy condom on the
back of his doggy-style mistress: "one for the country!" Mild stuff considering
German pr0n culture.
-- p
>On Thu,
car + eimer? ay carambas?!!
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Stuart VanZee wrote:
>>>What do you guys think about the reliability of the news
>>>(unfortunatelly in German only) on www.golem.de
>>
>>My German's rusty but the follow-up article quoting Symantec mentions
> spyware/keylogging, which
>>What do you guys think about the reliability of the news
>>(unfortunatelly in German only) on www.golem.de
>
>My German's rusty but the follow-up article quoting Symantec mentions
spyware/keylogging, which has been the >traditional "technique" used in
in the past.
>
>-- p
Quick, someone, how do
Peter Laufenberg wrote:
What do you guys think about the reliability of the news (unfortunatelly
in German only) on www.golem.de
My German's rusty but the follow-up article quoting Symantec mentions spyware/keylogging,
which has been the traditional "technique" used in in the past.
Yes, that
>What do you guys think about the reliability of the news (unfortunatelly
>in German only) on www.golem.de
My German's rusty but the follow-up article quoting Symantec mentions
spyware/keylogging, which has been the traditional "technique" used in in the
past.
-- p
On 2012-05-24 14:00:01 naddy () mips ! inka ! de (Christian Weisgerber) wrote:
> Stefan Wollny wrote:
>
> > that the German government
claims to be able to break PGP and SSH.
>
> I think you have to be cluelessly
paranoid to read such a claim
> into a meaningless state
You wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> What do you guys think about the reliability of the news (unfortunatelly
> in German only) on www.golem.de
> (http://www.golem.de/news/bundesregierung-deutsche-geheimdienste-koennen-pgp-
> entschluesseln-1205-92031.html) that the German government c
Stefan Wollny wrote:
> that the German government claims to be able to break PGP and SSH.
I think you have to be cluelessly paranoid to read such a claim
into a meaningless statement.
> Question:
> "3. Is the technique used also able to at least in part decode and/or
>
Hi Stefan,
On May 24, 2012, at 2:26 PM, Stefan Wollny wrote:
> Question:
> "3. Is the technique used also able to at least in part decode and/or
> analyze encrypted communication (e.g. by SSH of PGP)?"
>
> Answer:
> "Yes, the technique used is in principle able to do this, depending on
> the way
uesseln-1205-92031.html) that the German government claims to be
> able to break PGP and SSH. The official answer to some MPs and the party
> "Die Linke" is here:
> http://www.andrej-hunko.de/start/download/doc_download/225-strategische-fernm
> eldeaufklaerung-durch-geheimdi
Hi there!
What do you guys think about the reliability of the news (unfortunatelly
in German only) on www.golem.de
(http://www.golem.de/news/bundesregierung-deutsche-geheimdienste-koennen-pgp-
entschluesseln-1205-92031.html) that the German government claims to be
able to break PGP and SSH. The
13 matches
Mail list logo
