Re: Forcing ports install

2008-04-02 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2008-04-02, Josh Grosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 00:09:21 +1000, N J wrote > >> seemed to work ok so i keep going, I sorta presumed that 4.3 might >> have a branch of its own... > > Every release has two CVS tags: > > x.y-release: OPENBSD_x_y_BASE > x.y-stable: OPENBSD_x

Re: Forcing ports install

2008-04-02 Thread Josh Grosse
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 00:09:21 +1000, N J wrote > seemed to work ok so i keep going, I sorta presumed that 4.3 might > have a branch of its own... Every release has two CVS tags: x.y-release: OPENBSD_x_y_BASE x.y-stable: OPENBSD_x_y The CVS logs are the place to go to see which revisions apply t

Re: Forcing ports install

2008-04-02 Thread N J
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 11:52 PM, Josh Grosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 23:35:53 +1000, N J wrote > > > I've been doing: > > # cd /usr/ports > > # cvs -q up -Pd > > This will update an *existing* working directory in /usr/ports -- and that > update will use what

Re: Forcing ports install

2008-04-02 Thread Josh Grosse
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 08:52:38 -0500, I wrote > Something like this should work: > > # find /usr/ports -type f -name w-\* | xargs rm -rf Typo, sorry. -type d, not -type f. Sorry about that.

Re: Forcing ports install

2008-04-02 Thread Josh Grosse
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 23:35:53 +1000, N J wrote > I've been doing: > # cd /usr/ports > # cvs -q up -Pd This will update an *existing* working directory in /usr/ports -- and that update will use whatever CVS tag was used last, unless you use -A. Since we've established this was a -current

Re: Forcing ports install

2008-04-02 Thread N J
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Janne Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 22:33 +1000, N J wrote: > > Basically my question is how do I get the port to install without > > having to remove then old package and dependencies first? > > I'm trying to build pidgin out of

Re: Forcing ports install

2008-04-02 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2008-04-02, N J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Basically my question is how do I get the port to install without > having to remove then old package and dependencies first? > I'm trying to build pidgin out of the ports tree. > > Tried: set env FORCE_PKG_REGISTER > Tried: make install FORCE_PKG_REG

Re: Forcing ports install

2008-04-02 Thread Josh Grosse
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 22:33:00 +1000, N J wrote > Basically my question is how do I get the port to install without > having to remove then old package and dependencies first? > I'm trying to build pidgin out of the ports tree. > > Tried: set env FORCE_PKG_REGISTER > Tried: make install FORCE_PKG_REG

Re: Forcing ports install

2008-04-02 Thread Janne Johansson
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 22:33 +1000, N J wrote: > Basically my question is how do I get the port to install without > having to remove then old package and dependencies first? > I'm trying to build pidgin out of the ports tree. > > Tried: set env FORCE_PKG_REGISTER > Tried: make install FORCE_PKG_REG

Re: Forcing ports install

2008-04-02 Thread Will Maier
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 10:33:00PM +1000, N J wrote: > Basically my question is how do I get the port to install without > having to remove then old package and dependencies first? I'm > trying to build pidgin out of the ports tree. See bsd.port.mk(5) -- specifically, look at the update (or reins

Forcing ports install

2008-04-02 Thread N J
Basically my question is how do I get the port to install without having to remove then old package and dependencies first? I'm trying to build pidgin out of the ports tree. Tried: set env FORCE_PKG_REGISTER Tried: make install FORCE_PKG_REGISTER Sorry for my newbie question and thanks in advance