Re: Apache 2 License

2005-12-04 Thread Eduardo Alvarenga
> On 12/3/05, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (...) > > In case you didn't know gpl 2 sucks shit and so does apache 2. > > OpenBSD's version of apache is quite different than what they used to > > ship since we forked it. Apache 2 is in ports. Where? As I can see, It was 6 years ago un

Re: Apache 2 License

2005-12-04 Thread Bruno Carnazzi
rched and, on these lists, considered a > DUMB question. > > On Dec 2, 2005, at 11:46 PM, Bruno Carnazzi wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > I've checked the Apache 2 License, which is said to be GPL-2 > > compatible (http://www.apache.org/licenses/). So,

Re: Apache 2 License

2005-12-03 Thread eric
On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 09:46:35 +0400, Bruno Carnazzi proclaimed... > I've checked the Apache 2 License, which is said to be GPL-2 > compatible (http://www.apache.org/licenses/). So, OpenBSD include some > GPL programs (gcc), so what's make it "unacceptable" > (http

Apache 2 License

2005-12-02 Thread Bruno Carnazzi
Hi All, I've checked the Apache 2 License, which is said to be GPL-2 compatible (http://www.apache.org/licenses/). So, OpenBSD include some GPL programs (gcc), so what's make it "unacceptable" (http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq1.html#HowAbout) ? What are the differences wit