I learn by doing mistakes ! :) Thank you,
Bruno. On 12/3/05, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This has been discussed over and over and over and over and over and > over and over. Look at the archives, no more NEW gpl code will be > allowed in the tree. So besides gcc there is virtually nothing left > over. > > In case you didn't know gpl 2 sucks shit and so does apache 2. > OpenBSD's version of apache is quite different than what they used to > ship since we forked it. Apache 2 is in ports. > > Again, this is a very un-researched and, on these lists, considered a > DUMB question. > > On Dec 2, 2005, at 11:46 PM, Bruno Carnazzi wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > I've checked the Apache 2 License, which is said to be GPL-2 > > compatible (http://www.apache.org/licenses/). So, OpenBSD include some > > GPL programs (gcc), so what's make it "unacceptable" > > (http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq1.html#HowAbout) ? What are the > > differences with Apache 1.3 License ? > > > > Thanks, > > Best regards, > > > > Bruno.
