On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:17:02 +0100, Martin Reindl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>So they only problem now is documenting how to multiboot OpenBSD and
>WinNT on alpha? Pardon me, but i don't expect Nick to put up a section
>about this in the FAQ. Especially since it would involve explaining
>AlphaBIOS
"Richard P. Koett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Reindl wrote:
> > "J.C. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 18:03:21 +0100, Martin Reindl
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> "J.C. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 13
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 06:03:21PM +0100, Martin Reindl wrote:
> "J.C. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 13:50:48 -0800, "J.C. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >(2) When doing the installation disklabel, the "suggested" starting
> > >offset for the 'a' p
Martin Reindl wrote:
> "J.C. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 18:03:21 +0100, Martin Reindl
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> "J.C. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 13:50:48 -0800, "J.C. Roberts"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
"J.C. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 18:03:21 +0100, Martin Reindl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >"J.C. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 13:50:48 -0800, "J.C. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >(2) When doing the inst
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 18:03:21 +0100, Martin Reindl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>"J.C. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 13:50:48 -0800, "J.C. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >(2) When doing the installation disklabel, the "suggested" starting
>> >offset for t
"J.C. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 13:50:48 -0800, "J.C. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >(2) When doing the installation disklabel, the "suggested" starting
> >offset for the 'a' partition is 0? I know using an offset of 0 is
> >discouraged on i386 and othe
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 13:50:48 -0800, "J.C. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>(2) When doing the installation disklabel, the "suggested" starting
>offset for the 'a' partition is 0? I know using an offset of 0 is
>discouraged on i386 and other systems (default is 63), so I figured I'd
>ask if usi
"J.C. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:36:34 +0100 (CET), Tamas TEVESZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> >
> > > (1) When booting the cd38.iso with either bsd or bsd.rd you go into UKC
> > > rather than directly into the inst
On 12/16/05, Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On i386, that statement is STILL wrong, though you will be digging up
> either some unusual historic hardware or some really unusual devices for
> there to be an issue. Still, that's just wrong.
>
> On i386, it is NOT "63 sectors", it is "one
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 07:48:36PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
>
> Well, I guess I know how I'll be spending my Friday night...
> (once I get the lasagna out of the keyboard)
>
> Nick.
heh heh heh.
thanks,
jmc
Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 01:50:48PM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
>>
>> (2) When doing the installation disklabel, the "suggested" starting
>> offset for the 'a' partition is 0? I know using an offset of 0 is
>> discouraged on i386 and other systems (default is 63), so I figure
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> Eventually, the boot_osflags in the SRM needs to be set to "a" but the
> default is "A" -The case would make no difference for some OS's but
> OpenBSD probably won't like it. ;-)
fwiw i've been doing fine with `A' for ages.
--
[-]
mkdir /nonexisten
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:36:34 +0100 (CET), Tamas TEVESZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, J.C. Roberts wrote:
>
> > (1) When booting the cd38.iso with either bsd or bsd.rd you go into UKC
> > rather than directly into the installation. I'm guessing this is normal
> > since I'm sure
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 22:14:34 +, Jason McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 01:50:48PM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
>>
>> (2) When doing the installation disklabel, the "suggested" starting
>> offset for the 'a' partition is 0? I know using an offset of 0 is
>> discourage
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> (1) When booting the cd38.iso with either bsd or bsd.rd you go into UKC
> rather than directly into the installation. I'm guessing this is normal
> since I'm sure there might be some things that need doing for some of
> the more esoteric alpha hardwa
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 01:50:48PM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
>
> (2) When doing the installation disklabel, the "suggested" starting
> offset for the 'a' partition is 0? I know using an offset of 0 is
> discouraged on i386 and other systems (default is 63), so I figured I'd
> ask if using a 0 off
When doing an install of 3.8-RELEASE on an Alpha PSW-433 I noticed two
odd thing:
(1) When booting the cd38.iso with either bsd or bsd.rd you go into UKC
rather than directly into the installation. I'm guessing this is normal
since I'm sure there might be some things that need doing for some of
t
18 matches
Mail list logo
