3.6 is the best one irregardless...
On Oct 17, 2007, at 2:56 PM, Florin Andrei wrote:
Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Florin Andrei wrote:
Anybody can put a .flac or even .wav.gz copy for me on a server
somewhere?
My CD is scratched about 2/3 into the song. :-(
Not a flac or wav
Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Florin Andrei wrote:
Anybody can put a .flac or even .wav.gz copy for me on a server somewhere?
My CD is scratched about 2/3 into the song. :-(
Not a flac or wav, but see http://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html
Well, I was hoping to rebuild the scratche
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 11:17:13AM -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
| Matthias Pfeifer wrote:
| >just received my openbsd 4.2 CD set.
| >
| >And THANKS for this great song.
| >A kind of funky mixed with good old rock ;)
|
| Anybody can put a .flac or even .wav.gz copy for me on a server somewhere?
| M
gg versions are very high quality (in my ears). You
can download the 4.2 song here:
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/songs/song42.ogg
Martin
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had
a name of signature.asc]
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Florin Andrei wrote:
> Anybody can put a .flac or even .wav.gz copy for me on a server somewhere?
> My CD is scratched about 2/3 into the song. :-(
Not a flac or wav, but see http://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html
Jeremy C. Reed
Matthias Pfeifer wrote:
just received my openbsd 4.2 CD set.
And THANKS for this great song.
A kind of funky mixed with good old rock ;)
Anybody can put a .flac or even .wav.gz copy for me on a server somewhere?
My CD is scratched about 2/3 into the song. :-(
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.
just received my openbsd 4.2 CD set.
And THANKS for this great song.
A kind of funky mixed with good old rock ;)
Nothing gets any nerdier than this, O - M - G. *thinks of revenge of the nerds*
On 10/6/07, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just back from my (hiking) trip, I am happy to announce the 4.2
> song has been added to the lyrics page at
>
> http://www.openbsd.org/l
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 20:04:15 +0200, ropers wrote:
>On 08/10/2007, Tom Van Looy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think it should have been 101 instead of 11.
>
>Gord wrote:
>> Someone is giving it a go:
>> http://slashdot.org/~TheRaven64/journal/184027
>
>That's real interesting, guys.
>TheRa
Perhaps: Regarding "...these are ! and U..."
As in "not equal to proprietary"
(UNIX=$? unix=free?)
Or in other words, "free"
(I'm a newbie in the Unix-world so my apologies if I'm confusing free vs $ with
UNIX vs unix/unix-like.)
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type APPLICATION/DEFANGED
On 08/10/2007, Tom Van Looy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it should have been 101 instead of 11.
Gord wrote:
> Someone is giving it a go:
> http://slashdot.org/~TheRaven64/journal/184027
That's real interesting, guys.
TheRaven64 writes that (0)11 1010101 is (caesar-)ciphertext
> >> Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >>> And there's a few easter eggs hidden in the song as well.
> >
> On Oct 8, 2007, at 11:43 AM, ropers wrote:
> > Okay, I can't bear it any longer. I thought that maybe binary 11
> > and 1010101 stood for decimal 33 and 85, and that made me think of
> > ASCII ! and
And of course,
1001001
011
1010101
lacks the sexual innuendo, but it's a super nice thing to tell your
one and only. :)
--ropers
On 10/8/07, ropers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 08/10/2007, Craig Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > And there's a few easter eggs hidden in the song as well.
>
> Okay, I can't bear it any longer. I thought that maybe binary 11
> and 1010101 stood for decimal
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 11:55:11AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
[snip]
> And there's a few easter eggs
> hidden in the song as well. It also explains the inside sleeve
> image...
Someone is giving it a go:
http://slashdot.org/~TheRaven64/journal/184027
Gord
I think it should have been 101 instead of 11. But if it's not
than it's a good easter egg :-p (and I don't get it).
ropers wrote:
On 08/10/2007, Craig Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Theo de Raadt wrote:
And there's a few easter eggs hidden in the song as well.
Okay, I can't be
On 08/10/2007, Craig Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > And there's a few easter eggs hidden in the song as well.
Okay, I can't bear it any longer. I thought that maybe binary 11
and 1010101 stood for decimal 33 and 85, and that made me think of
ASCII ! and U. But I
Theo de Raadt wrote:
And there's a few easter eggs hidden in the song as well.
Gifts from the "water chicken" no doubt.
As usual, OpenBSD marches to the sound of its own drum :-))
Nice one.
2007/10/6, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Just back from my (hiking) trip, I am happy to announce the 4.2
> song has been added to the lyrics page at
>
> http://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html
>
> Yes, it is designed to sound like a mid-era Rush song, ie. s
Just back from my (hiking) trip, I am happy to announce the 4.2
song has been added to the lyrics page at
http://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html
Yes, it is designed to sound like a mid-era Rush song, ie. something
from Grace Under Pressure or such. And there's a few easter eggs
hidd
20 matches
Mail list logo
