On 08/10/2007, Tom Van Looy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it should have been 1000001 instead of 100001.
Gord wrote: > Someone is giving it a go: > http://slashdot.org/~TheRaven64/journal/184027 That's real interesting, guys. TheRaven64 writes that (0)100001 1010101 is (caesar-)ciphertext for Au. But going with Tom's suggestion of a missing 0, 1000001 1010101 is plaintext for AU. So is Gold the answer or is it "not you"? I dunno, but me likey! :) --ropers
