Re: "fib couple" ignored

2007-01-26 Thread Toni Mueller
Hello Stuart, On Fri, 26.01.2007 at 12:36:18 +, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 'bgpctl sh nex' lists *nexthops*, not peers. nexthops are not re- > written unless you 'set nexthop self', they stay as learned from the > e-bgp sessions. OK. I was thoroughly confused and scared, t

Re: "fib couple" ignored

2007-01-26 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi Claudio, On Fri, 26.01.2007 at 13:30:36 +0100, Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You probably need to either add a static route for the router or add a > nexthop qualify via default or nexthop qualify via bgp to your config. > Since 4.0 bgpd will only use nexthops that reachable via st

Re: "fib couple" ignored

2007-01-26 Thread Stuart Henderson
> well, it turns out that the machine can't see their neighbours too > well. The iBGP peer isn't listed, 'bgpctl sh nex' lists *nexthops*, not peers. nexthops are not re- written unless you 'set nexthop self', they stay as learned from the e-bgp sessions. > and the upstream is now marked "invalid

Re: "fib couple" ignored

2007-01-26 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 01:11:52PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 26.01.2007 at 11:45:36 +0100, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > IF, and only IF, the nexthops are valid and reachable. > > bgpctl show nexthop > > is your friend. > > well, it turns out that the machine

Re: "fib couple" ignored (addendum)

2007-01-26 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Fri, 26.01.2007 at 13:11:52 +0100, Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > well. The iBGP peer isn't listed, and the upstream is now marked > "invalid" although they can both be reached via static routes, are up, forgot to mention that the iBGP peer is about the same OpenBSD code (maybe

Re: "fib couple" ignored

2007-01-26 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Fri, 26.01.2007 at 11:45:36 +0100, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IF, and only IF, the nexthops are valid and reachable. > bgpctl show nexthop > is your friend. well, it turns out that the machine can't see their neighbours too well. The iBGP peer isn't listed, and the upstrea

Re: "fib couple" ignored

2007-01-26 Thread Henning Brauer
* Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-26 11:26]: > today I stumble across a very strange problem. I have a session with > a peer who offers me ~204k prefixes. So far, so good. I usually import > them into the kernel's routing table by saying 'bgpctl fib couple', but > I also have this in my b

"fib couple" ignored

2007-01-26 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, today I stumble across a very strange problem. I have a session with a peer who offers me ~204k prefixes. So far, so good. I usually import them into the kernel's routing table by saying 'bgpctl fib couple', but I also have this in my bgpd.conf: fib-update yes log updates So, in theory, my k