On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 1:13 AM, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-03-11, nicodache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Now, the question is : is there any way to remotely (my box is in a
> > remote securized datacenter with double code) jump from rai
rives
and degraded arrays, or go in the datacenter, copy the data, and put
them back on a softraid thing.
Right ?
Thank you for any input.
Regards,
nicodache
As promised, and as my server is up again, here is the dmesg.
Now, why is rtorrent freezing the server... not a clue
OpenBSD 4.2 (GENERIC.RAID) #1: Sun Jan 6 22:08:19 CET 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.RAID
cpu0: Intel Pentium III ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 795 MHz
cpu0
ed by the fact that Belgium is partly French and the
> Netherlands is completely Dutch.
>
> ps: will be at Fosdem too
>
>
>
> >- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
> >Van: nicodache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Verzonden: vrijdag, februari 22, 2008 12:35 PM
&
You're right, this is the native language of the Netherlands, and also
(in a slightly modified version) the one spoken by half the people
from belgium.
The first one is the dutch, the second the flemish.
I think if you try to binary-xor it with the lyrics from latest song
from clouseau, you'd get
I've been using rtorrent on openbsd 4.1 for more than 6 months without
a single breakdown.
now, in less than 2 weeks, my 4.2 box (the same hardware, just
upgraded version) froze twice...
is it really a network issue ? or is it more like an rtorrent problem ?
Cheers,
On Feb 19, 2008 3:53 PM, Giri
Enough of this FUD.
Go hang yourself please.
Thanks
On Jan 10, 2008 9:27 PM, Siju George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 7, 2008 9:48 AM, Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > I don't carry a mobile phone, but I don't see anything wrong in
> > >> borrowing one from someone
eeing said, I never liked that purple sweat-shirt of yours. Get
an OpenBSD t-shirt instead, the benefits will help us making OpenBSD
more free than ever ;-)
Cheers,
nicodache
Roosevelt, 50
1050 Brussels
And as usual, there will be software under other licences than GPL,
like, I mean, err, like OpenBSD.
I think we coule put that info on http://www.openbsd.org/events.html ;)
Cheers,
nicodache
Still busy trying to make thing good on my server, I'm configuring
altq bandwidth management in pf.conf
here is the part concerning bandwidth management, written, as told,
between scrub & nat (which I don't have, so between scrub & filters) :
# SET BANDWIDTH MANAGEMENT
altq on $ext_if cbq bandwid
You don't get the problem, at least if you run a decent operating
system, 'cause I know some people having problem using more than 4 Gig
of ram, even with AMD64 or EM64T hardware, and (hum) Vista.
Just to say the arch does not make everything, a good software is also needed.
plus, X86_64 gets rid
d you advice me to use, in place of vsftpd ( I add I do need
to set up some virtual users) that does not require pam to do the
authentication, or some trick to replace pam to keep my vsftpd setup ?
Thank you for any interesting answer.
nicodache
I think AxiomTek has what you're looking for.
And if it doesn't, then either there is no such thing as you search,
or it's well hidden.
regards,
On 9/25/07, Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> nicodache wrote:
> > ...
> > You should go into the ARM world
VIA, Intel lo-comsumption, are X86-based.
You should go into the ARM world to get something like that, and you
will be disapointed, as it is much much harder to find something with
4 network connectors, serial, flash, pci, mini-pci connector, due to
the lack of products & manufacturers.
You may wa
first partition 100m for the boot
> which makes sense then it doesn't say how to partition the rest of
> your drive to setup for the RAID 1? Can someone clarify this a bit
> more please? I'm stuck.
>
> Thanks,
> - Jake
>
> Anyways how do I fix this FS_RAID problem
>
I personnaly used the following doc to set up my software raid 1 frame :
http://www.linux.com/articles/52713
good luck :)
On 9/12/07, Steve Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jake Conk wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've searched hi and low for hours on how to setup my system of a RAID
> > 1 and ba
ok.
so you all advice me to install 4.2 with xbase.
and with that, I can install packages/ports with no_x11, and things
that needs X parts will work correctly ?
I'll go for that :)
On 9/10/07, Markus Hennecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> nicodache schrieb:
> > On 9/10/
not supported as in "we don't care if you have problem with it", or
not supported as in "it will certainly end with a segfault" ?
On 9/10/07, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> building from ports without X is not supported (including those
> that don't need X to run).
package are nice, but hwo do they handle flavor ?
because I installed a system without X, and each time in try to
install (by ports) a new software, it tries to compile it using X, and
thus fails.
are package compiled using standard choice, thus using X I don't have
? or are package built in a more
anybody with an Asus S6F(m) or U1F running OpenBSD ?
These are aslo quite small, and while the S6F is quite thick, it comes
with an internal DVD burner. Second battery push the autonomy up to
10h. Thinking about buying it, and using some BSD on it.
On 9/4/07, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
o you guys, and off to another problem ; /etc/boot.conf
not used \x/
We'll see that tomorrow, gonna sleep now, 34 after midnight here.
nicodache
On 8/21/07, nicodache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Me again,
>
> Trying to play with the serial port to see if I can get it to work
s sorcerer-ish things...
any clues on why I got no luck ?
Could that be due to RAIDframe ?
Or am I just some kind of idiot ?
Thx
On 8/21/07, nicodache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is the content of /etc/ttys file. do you see any mistake ?
>
> -bash-3.2$ grep -v none /etc/ttys
&
600" unknown off
tty06 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" unknown off
tty07 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" unknown off
when getting the stage 2 boot loading prompt, I also get the following message :
probing: pc0 com0 mem[639K 1023M a20=on]
disk: fd0 fd1 hd0+ hd1+
&g
): (RAID Level 1) total number of sectors is 156091648
(76216 MB) as root
dkcsum: wd0 matches BIOS drive 0x80
dkcsum: wd1 matches BIOS drive 0x81
swapmount: no device
On 8/20/07, Darren Spruell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/20/07, nicodache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hel
o work anymore :(
I think some unplug/replug of serial cable was involved. Seems abnormal to me...
nicodache
On 8/20/07, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 03:55:50PM -0400, Jim Razmus wrote:
> > * nicodache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [0708
?
I'm still running generic kernel plus RAIDframe. My serial port should
be detected by the kernel, shouldn't they ?
any guess would be neat, I really do feel unconfident with serial ports :-/
Would a dmesg be of any use in this case ?
Thanks
nicodache
On 8/20/07, Jim Razmus <[EMA
Proliant DL 320 (G1), with only 1
serial port on the motherboard.
Is there anyway for me to check my com port is detected and working,
before I put my server into a datacenter ?
Thanks
nicodache
what do you mean by "couldn't boot the cd41.iso proprerly" ?
did you get any error message, any kernel panic, or things like that ?
for info to the other RpenBSD-misc reader, this laptop seems to be
more than recent, with hardware like Core 2 duo 7300, GB965, SATA
drive, X3100 (Intel gpu), broadc
28 matches
Mail list logo
