Re: bsd.mp hangs with acpi enabled

2009-01-18 Thread llx
6 byte fifo pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5 pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot) pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0 pmsi0 at pckbc0 (aux slot) pckbc0: using irq 12 for aux slot wsmouse0 at pmsi0 mux 0 pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61 midi0 at pcppi0: spkr0 at pcppi0 lpt0

high ping times between qemu host and gemu guest with GEMERIC.MP

2007-12-02 Thread llx
hi machines involved: host running OpenBSD 4.1 GENERIC.MP#2 i386 / qemu-0.8.2p4 (dmesg see below) guest running OpenBSD 4.2 GENERIC#1 i386 some running OpenBSD 4.0 GENERIC#12 i386 guest runs on host some another machine on the same lan 1. ping guest on host 36 packets transmitted, 36 pac

high ping times between qemu host and gemu guest with GEMERIC.MP

2007-12-02 Thread llx
hi machines involved: host running OpenBSD 4.1 GENERIC.MP#2 i386 / qemu-0.8.2p4 (dmesg see below) guest running OpenBSD 4.2 GENERIC#1 i386 some running OpenBSD 4.0 GENERIC#12 i386 guest runs on host some another machine on the same lan 1. ping guest on host 36 packets transmitted, 36 pac

quick test of netbeans pkg

2007-03-22 Thread llx
for testing proposes i installed a current snapshoot. i saw the announcement of the netbean pkg thus i complied jdk 1.5 and installed netbeans. when i build/run a project the output in the output/console of netbeans is mostly not readable. it prints targets like init: deps-jar: but the ou

mapping promise product name to chip-id

2006-12-18 Thread llx
to find a reliable mapping table? 2. how do i have to interpret the following: in the FAQ: Supported hardware i don't see support for PDC40718. grepping the source let me assume there is. cheers llx

Re: propolice

2005-12-29 Thread LLX
On Thursday 29 December 2005 22.44, Ted Unangst wrote: > On 12/29/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -fstack-protector : Enable stack protection for functions which contain > > character arrays. > > -fno-stack-protector : Disable use of stack protection (ProPolice). > > -fstack-pr

propolice

2005-12-29 Thread llx
hi is was playing around with a couple of attacks. while looking at smash attacks i was supprised. simple strcpy attack / no gcc-options (defaults) - the stack-smash is detected in 'main' - the stack-smash is NOT detected in 'foo' a look at the assembler code file shows that no code is generate