On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 14:32 -0200, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
> When you use UDP, you're seeing the results on the client or in the server ?
>
> iperf uses busy-waiting to implement flow-control in UDP, so basically
> if you specify an absurd rate transfer, the client will try to deliver
> at
Hi all,
back again trying to debug causes of bad performances in my lab's
network.
I tried to place two boxes behind a Cisco router (no information on
model, sorry), the first with OpenBSD 4.6 and the second one with Linux
Ubuntu 9.04.
I used iperf to measure bandwidth, in particular the two box
Il 06/02/10 19:43, Claudio Jeker ha scritto:
Thank you for the clear answer. Anyway, trying to act on tcp.sendspace
isn't affecting the upload capabilities of my OpenBSD server.
I tried downloading a file through httpd, via ftp but results are
still disappointing: 60-70 kbp
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 11:37:11 +0100 (GMT+01:00)
Vincent Tamet wrote:
> Hi, by the way strange mac-adresse, oui search show a cisco systems
> mac one...
> > > Just logged through ssh on the server, ifconfig reports:
> > >
> > > re0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> > > lladdr 00:b0:c2:02:5e:a0
> > >
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 19:43:54 +0100
Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > >> Thank you for the clear answer. Anyway, trying to act on
> > >> tcp.sendspace isn't affecting the upload capabilities of my
> > >> OpenBSD server. I tried downloading a file through httpd, via
> > >> ftp but results are still disappoin
Il 06/02/10 18:45, James Peltier ha scritto:
> Have you tried another network card, like an Intel (em) based
> card? The Realtek cards have, at least in the past, been poor performers for
> me.
> __
I have only available another eth
Il 06/02/10 17:33, Kenneth R Westerback ha scritto:
> Optimally you now need to check what the switch port is
> configured/negotiated to. e.g. if it has ended up in 10/half you
> have a problem. Ditto for the connections for the other device.
>
> If you have no access to the switch you can try eve
Il 06/02/10 15:12, Claudio Jeker ha scritto:
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 01:27:12PM +0100, Sebastiano Pomata wrote:
>> Il 06/02/10 03:55, Stuart Henderson ha scritto:
>>>> I really can understand this, for the sake of system portability and so
>>>> on. Anyway, I real
Il 06/02/10 15:12, Claudio Jeker ha scritto:
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 01:27:12PM +0100, Sebastiano Pomata wrote:
>> Il 06/02/10 03:55, Stuart Henderson ha scritto:
>>>> I really can understand this, for the sake of system portability and so
>>>> on. Anyway, I real
Il 06/02/10 03:55, Stuart Henderson ha scritto:
>> I really can understand this, for the sake of system portability and so
>> on. Anyway, I really hardly understand why, without touching any of the
>> default settings, download rate from every server would never overcome
>> the value of 400 kB/s. I
Il 05/02/10 16:11, Ted Unangst ha scritto:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Ivo Chutkin wrote:
>> I was about to post the same topic here.
>> I observe 250K/s on any OpenBSD server in my network, versions 4.2, 4.4, 4.5
>> and 4.6, various hardware, using wget -O /dev/null
>> I can start the same
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:39:03 +0100
Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 08:59:44AM +0100, Sebastiano Pomata wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 02:05:49 + (UTC)
> > Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> > > On 2010-02-04, Sebastiano Pomata
> > > wrote:
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 02:05:49 + (UTC)
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2010-02-04, Sebastiano Pomata wrote:
> > As doublechecking, I tried with another fast server inside the wan
> > network of our academy, and I'm getting almost the same results
> > (while absolute
lues are
almost the same I edited), still not having clear why on default
OpenBSD the transfer rates are so low.
thank you all
Il 04/02/2010 21.36, Jean-Francois ha scritto:
> Le jeudi 04 fivrier 2010 20:00:54, Sebastiano Pomata a icrit :
>> If I may ask, I post to the list this questi
p.recvspace and
net.inet.tcp.sendspace won't led to great improvements, while actually
I got them?
Again, my intentions are *really* positive and I just want to learn
more (a quick search on -misc archives didn't led me to much stuff).
Thank you
Sebastiano
Il 20/01/10 18:18, MERIGHI Marcus ha scritto:
> Hello Sebastiano,
>
> I once got it going by adding the failed component to dev as a spare
> (raidctl -a component dev). After rebooting the component was not a
> spare anymore but turned to the live component (automagically
> r
Il 21/01/10 01:38, Robert ha scritto:
> On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:31:58 +0100
> Sebastiano Pomata wrote:
>
>> I can't understand how to get the latest version of trac from the
>> ports. I downloaded just today the whole ports tree for OpenBSD, but I
>> can only
gh AnonCVS to one
random server from the one listed on OpenBSD website was enough
Il 16/01/2010 15.31, Stuart Henderson ha scritto:
> On 2010-01-15, Sebastiano wrote:
>> I found on OpenPorts the trac package, and I'm wondering if it is
>> already ok to work with chroote
ulm
>
>
>
> On 20/01/2010, at 3:32 AM, Sebastiano wrote:
>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I've setup my homeserver for a RAID 1 software configuration, mostly
>> following instructions of this guide
>> (http://www.argon18.com/raid_openbsd.html) that is base
You have been really helpful.
Thank you
Il 19/01/2010 17.03, Stuart Henderson ha scritto:
> On 2010-01-19, Sebastiano Pomata wrote:
>> Thank you. Feel like a newbie (and maybe I am), but in ports/www I
>> didn't found anything, and google wasn't more helpful
>
>
Hi list,
I've setup my homeserver for a RAID 1 software configuration, mostly
following instructions of this guide
(http://www.argon18.com/raid_openbsd.html) that is based on RAIDFrame
kernel support.
Things went ok, and after some days of normal usage I wanted to test
efficiency of RAID array so
Thank you. Feel like a newbie (and maybe I am), but in ports/www I
didn't found anything, and google wasn't more helpful
Il 18/01/10 23:16, Stuart Henderson ha scritto:
> On 2010-01-18, Sebastiano Pomata wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm getting stuck trying
he2's apxs and not to /usr/sbin/apxs.
>
> But then you will have to do other hacks to make it work.
> It's not that trivial.
>
> On (2010-01-18 13:34), Sebastiano wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> for various reasons I need to abandon the perfect chrooted solutio
Hi,
I'm getting stuck trying to obtain mod_dav_svn. I'm compiling
subversion from the ports tree (version 1.6.1), the flavor is the
default so it should come with apache2 support, then I install the
package normally but no trace of dav_svn.so file.
How can I specify the correct path to apxs2 (tho
Hi all,
for various reasons I need to abandon the perfect chrooted solution of
apache-httpd and move to apache2 (I'm planning to run knowledgetree, a
DMS that only works with apache2).
I'm having troubles with php5-core official package, since if I try to
add the LoadModule line in apache2 config
31, Stuart Henderson ha scritto:
> On 2010-01-15, Sebastiano wrote:
>> I found on OpenPorts the trac package, and I'm wondering if it is
>> already ok to work with chrooted apache provided by a default
>> installation.
>>
>> Or do I have to tweak something (or a lot)?
Hi,
I found on OpenPorts the trac package, and I'm wondering if it is
already ok to work with chrooted apache provided by a default
installation.
Or do I have to tweak something (or a lot)?
Or simply it just won't work and I should get apache-httpd?
I'm a fresh user so please apologize if answe
27 matches
Mail list logo
